“I am true to my word, calling balls and strikes, and population density in urban areas is demonstrable fact, so their strike zone must be 3/5 wider.”

Rats (something something) sinking ship

Time to build a digital duplicate, and an agent-wrapper to run your socials. Scale, man.

Spill, bruh, spill.

“Dude, we’re passenger pigeons. Now get in the f~€£ing car.”

Excellent visual depictions. Can’t help but ‘see’ any one of those 3 faces on a sea lion, sea lioning.

Get that Article 2 sh*t outta here

So, then, it'll be a Double Jeopardy category in short order, yes?

I'll take "Feudalism" for $2,000 Ken...

He'll be speaking at SLS on Tuesday. You're invited!

SCR

Will someone please check the betting markets: Polymarket, Kalshi, Wall Street

What’s your authority for this assertion? (I can think of some famous historical examples wherein this was fundamentally not true).

a man is holding a microphone in front of his face and says `` hello ? is this thing on ? '' ALT: a man is holding a microphone in front of his face and says `` hello ? is this thing on ? ''

Hello, the name is POPEhat…

The Cognitive Bias Codex (notably, no safe harbors for experts, or political perspective):

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Co...

Your Honor, I call my character witness, Mr. Jeff Clark.

Federal prisoners eat better than this. Your Republicans dollars at work.

Maybe go on camera and shred him?

“Well, if you don’t own a boat, man, I don’t know what to tell ya”

@nytpitchbot.bsky.social

Excellent work. (And I have yet to read it!)

Please don’t buy in to the false frame

Wild that Altman is being sued by his sister for repeated sexual abuse and that doesn’t come up in basically every conversation about him. I get that it’s alleged but if that shit was happening to someone else I feel like that would come up, particularly if that person had a history of lying a lot.

Constitutional Conversation with Ilan Wurman | Stanford Law School Why did the Founders enumerate power? What did they think of executive power? Did John Marshall invent judicial review? Join us for a constitutional c

@evanbernick.bsky.social

law.stanford.edu/event/consti...

Right. It’s an analogy, not a real event. To demo the limited scope of “innocent until proven….” Whether a witness elects to, or even can, intercede to prevent the event is an unrelated question.

wut

“Innocent until proven guilty” is a term of art cabined by the sphere of rights afforded a person charged by the government with a crime.

Put differently: if you see a person slap a child in the park, you are not required to think/say “oh! but innocent until convicted!” You say: Guilty As Hell!

(or say)

He would’ve killed. And, there’s another office round the corner he should hold.