I believe the word is victim. But I'll give you this, men who follow plp like Trump are usually simply pecking-order leeches. The women are true believers. In the worse sense of the term.

So would exception/rule.

Exactly what I've been saying since that grifting lout was reinstalled. Throw the Dem wimps out along with complicit Republicans. It's going to take fighters to take back the country, and most importantly, hold the corrupt accountable.

And here I thought the fact he seemed like a talker, not a doer, was the only reason to be less than thrilled with his candidacy. Either way, he's toast.

Having to enact legislation to keep insurrectionists out of government is as ridiculous as letting an 88-time indicted/34-time convicted felon run for president.

No reflection on you. Trump is president, again, which proves beyond a doubt that at least half of Americans are complete morons.

That pic needs to be a greeting card, now!

Gut wrenching. The entire hearing.

ICE agents need food and housing to occupy cities. Local businesses should simply take that away. If businesses won't or can't do it on their own, boycott the corporations and reimburse the mom and pops.

But leave off the protector part.

They need to keep the ICE recruits as hopped-up and crazy as possible.

Hey, I don't know of a Dem who didn't count the days until Bill left office, just to stop the bleeding. But everyone knew the impeachment was a political hit job, the fact his approval rating was in the 80s shows that, and how effective he was at his job. Power corrupts. Judge the extent.

No argument there, but illegal is still illegal, and for all his flaws, I don't think he'd cross that line. Guess we'll see. But not through that sham of a Congressional subpoena.

True, and let's expand that logically. Bill's association with Epstein was right after he left office, under the cloud of the Lewinsky debacle. He's a dog, but he isn't stupid. It simply makes no sense he'd get himself in more trouble while trying to shake off that scandal.

Well, as opposed to Trump's lengthy involvement; "best friends", rape lawsuits, possible Russian money laundering, supplying victims, and considering the Republican need for a Look Squirrel, Clinton's guilt by association should be put in a proper perspective.

Because whether you like them or not, the Clinton's were perhaps the most savvy and effective leaders in modern history. Moderates who appealed to both sides and routinely ate Republicans for breakfast. And the whack right never got over it.

For what, taking Epstein's money for his foundation? Because that's most likely the extent of his involvement. Absolutely prosecute Bill if he actually did engage in improper behavior, but remember Epstein ingratiated himself by being a major Democrat donor.

I don't understand why reporters keep saying Trump hasn't been accused of anything related. He was sued by a woman for raping her at an Epstein party when she was 13. Pretty sure that's a formal accusation.

Sure, that would have been a better press release, but headlines aside, they did issue a pretty lengthy letter covering all that. I'll agree folks rarely get past the headlines.

That was already implied.

It's one thing for Smith to testify. He's shoving the persecution back in their face. But the Clintons have absolutely no reason to submit to this obvious ploy. If there's evidence against either, the Republicans can get a criminal warrant or an indictment, but def fight the congressional clown show

Why?

I wonder how many Adderall it took to fuel this epic shitshow?

Oh this is special.

A 36% approval rate in total meltdown.

And the morons he rode in on.

Those people should be asked when and how their souls died.

Think what you will about the art and the risk, but killing the bull is chickenshit.

Gotta love those, eat s*** and die, looks. 😂

He caught Trump's Foot in Mouth disease.