“What are you in for?”

“Felony bralessness”

If partisan redistricting is bad, why can't the @nytimes.com write about it honestly, with blame placed where it lies -- first with SCOTUS for declaring all gerrymanders save explicit racial ones blessed in the eyes of the constitution?

The Times simply hates honesty. Hates it passionately.

Yes!

had the cops in Smith v Scott even heard of Drummond? (It was Drummond, right? I'm writing from memory in my notifications)

Would the cops know or care if the person they were suffocating had Schizophrenia (Paranoid Subtype) or Bipolar II (Psychotic features)?

These decisions are insane.

Well, the Pitt finale was good, if anyone wanted my opinion.

But it's 11pm, so I'm off to bed. Toodles, my poodles.

Pshaw.

You're wonderful, thank you.

And since I'm on about it, thank you just more generally for your work.

Sorry about that, folks. The original was posted by @jolyon.goodlawproject.org of the Good Law Project. It included an excerpt from a Kathleen Stock essay praising the LGB Stonewall charity head Kezia Dugsdale (sp?) for her "fearlessness" in standing up to "pitchfork-wielding mobs" to praise JKR.

Kathleen Stock gives every appearance of writing an ode to the heroism of the "fearless" cops raiding Stonewall Inn despite "mobs of [brick-throwing] fanatics."

Yes, in the history of the fight for gay rights, there have been those who stood athwart justice & said, "NO RIGHTS FOR YOU!"

Fuck them.

I also noticed the historical illiteracy of calling you by the name of some convenience store drink.

You don't have to be an egyptologists with a PhD to know the name Sobek. Just watch one of the Mummy movies or the Moon Knight series or just read a little anything while paying attention.

I always thought the same thing about Charles de Gaulle, but it turns out he's Swiss.

Oh, sure, just ruin everyone's fun with honesty and facts.

Your nerd goes to 11.

Ani DiFranco - Untouchable Face YouTube video by HybridFalcon

I recognize that one:

Sachs is in agreement with the governing principle of all three branches of gov't: The powerful should never be held accountable to the law, much less to the weak.

Here, the misconduct of powerful publications is only of concern to the extent that protects the misconduct of more powerful justices.

There's nothing I like more than a conversation comparing Objectively Banal Pitching with impressive Overhand-Pitch Strikeouts.

QI doctrine creates the illusion of fairness while founded upon a legal contradiction.

It is no doctrine at all.

QI is unfair to officers as well as to citizens whose rights are deprived. (Too often unto death.)

For notice to have sufficient legal clarity, it must provide sufficient situational applicability. If you can't use the notice bc of excessive intricacies, it isn't notice.

If Drummand is insufficient notice for Smith, then imagine a world where -- look I know it's hard, but bear with me -- a legitimately identical case does occur.

Will the cops be "on notice" even then? How will they, in a tense situation's midst, instantly recall Drummond's innumerable details?

I don't think it would be particularly effective before this SCOTUS, but the court's QI doctrine is paradoxical.

The idea is that cops must be put on notice that the bx is violative of rights, but there simply is no human that can memorize all the QI cases with sufficient specificity.

You are absolutely beautiful.

I didn't think that Mondays were allowed to be this delightful.

Even with one extra day and all the fried food, if I had to pick just one, I don't think I could pick Hanukkah over National Library Week.

But all the fried food!

No, no. Probably NLW.

I think.

I still remember when Star Wars forced Jimmy Carter to put solar water heaters on the roof of the White House and then mount of failed military rescue of embassy workers in Iran.

I'm not good at running things, but most of my friends are queer women and I have a clipboard you can have if you need one.

One of the best lines Shakespeare ever quilled.

Friends, BlueSky, social media users: I come not to exonerate Patel, but to endlessly mock him.

GLEE: The Game Librarian's Encyclopedic Emulator

Plays every arcade & console game that came out before 2010, with an easily accessible ROM catalog and game library, and it's all native to macOS on Apple Silicon.

I don't think that would do it for me.

I think I still need depositions under oath of all his aides and security staff and himself and his family and his girlfriend.

He's got nothing to fear if he's got nothing to hide, and it would be fun to read the summaries here on BlueSky.

I know the beef is real. I've had assholes yell at me when I voted for Harris, and tell me that I lied about voting for Harris, simply bc I said something that tried to encourage them not to be fuckmelons to the people they want to vote for them.

But the beef is real bc Dem entitlement is real.

Besides, have you considered the possibility that it was a nonpublic journalistic observance in the NYTimes?

Yeah, sorry justices. You said that a prayer on the 50 yard line with fans watching from the stands was a private religious observance -- not a public one, and one with no possibility of coercion.

You can't say something stupider or more mendacious in "nonpublic deliberations."