You must have a good scientific practice Ombudsperson at the institute. They are probably the best people to contact for advice. On the other hand, the agreement appears fairly watertight from what I see on your screenshot.
Check this gem starring Lee Cronin (one of them):
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rf34...
Hm, the genre...
That it shows phosphorescence?
Ooh, the irony of having 'structure-property correlations' and '0D perovskites' in the same title.
It bothers me that structural naming is not regarded as stringent as that for properties. No one would come to the conclusion of calling a metal a superconductor, just because the resistivity drops in a phase transition (looking at you: Sn).
As 2nd order phase transitions are profoundly symmetry driven, I would even go so far to say this system works, because it is *not* a perovskite.
That's a fascinating piece. As a self-proclaimed crystallographer, though, I would argue that there are no 2D perovskites.
Hm, is that what the physicist call "bake out"?
Where have you gone, Toto diMaggio?
This paper is for you, Dorothy!
Literally laughing my backside off...
40% more sounds a lot like one of the ligands is missing?
And 40 odd percent Mg? By weight or molar? Or was it that, what they confused?
Is it a pure compound or mixed with something else, say carbonate/oxide?
Yep. I once saw a talk at a conference showing a crystal structure of isolated coordination complexes with a profoundly molecular UV-VIS spectrum, where the authors tried to determine an optical bandgap.
I wonder if you have the option to hand abstracts over to other suitable sessions? I remember that some sessions were not completely using all their talk slots, while others were packed with abstracts in Melbourne.
Maybe you would like to invite fellow X to attend?
And hand the golf courses over to Denmark?
m.youtube.com/watch?v=BkAB...
Same here, though I was even more irritated when I found out that IUCr journals are using that, too. I specifically asked, after they changed my draft.
Hahaha! I just saw the question mark at the end of the first sentence. How am I supposed to know if they are short of articles?
Btw. I am intending to disappoint whoever "us" is referring to. Sorry...
Screenshot of a mail from an allegedly ransom journal starting with "Dear Dr. Respected Author" and containing the phrase "We hope you don't disappoint us."
The address is (science) comedy gold, though I have to be exact and demand that it should be "Dear Prof. Respected Author".
I am not sure about treating their pattern as two independent structures despite being related through a group-subgroup relationship. Would need to check if there isn't a subgroup that explains all reflections.
Yes, I do have questions.
Invitation for the "Journal of Skeleton System"
Clearly, I am more flattered by some journal invitations than by others. However, I cannot take the fame for this one, since the article "Customizing Multicolored Orbital Angular Momentum Combs" that the skeletons lived so much is nothing I ever published...
Is that the one opposite park bar?
Or to put it more profanely: I'd rather thank the engineer than the screwdriver for holding my wheels in place.
Not a fan of the premise - a machine does not invent or craft anything, it does what it is told and built to do.
The precision of e.g. James Webb is neither a coincidence nor it's own achievement, but a result of scientists' development. Those building such machines should get the acclaim.