#HIV #ART #Safety
Happy to share a commentary of 2 target trial emulations #TTE linking metabolic complications to #INSTI switch published in #TLHIV
www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Posts by
D’expert « anti-vax »
Je ne trouve pas idéologie dans la pyramide du niveau de preuve. Et vous?
Does subclavian CVC still carry higher pneumothorax risk in the ultrasound era? 🫁
New emulated reanalysis of the 3SITES RCT shows:
❌ Subclavian excess PNO risk DISAPPEARS with ultrasound
✅ LOWER CRBSI w subclavian vs jugular/femoral
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Proud to hit 100 peer-reviews for @TheLancetHIV! 🎉
As a stats reviewer, here are 3 red flags 🛑😒that yields to reject⛔️:
1️⃣ Cc driven by hypothesis, not data 🙄
2️⃣ Primary outcome swap for p-value 🕵🏻♂️
3️⃣ Stats copy-pasted 🤡 by ppl who don’t understands it
#HIV #peerRW
My birth date (DD/MM/YY) is not just a #palindrome
It combines the #worst and the #best hand in #poker
27 - AA - 72 !
😅😉
Cluster of 3 lampshades
Colors are not random
Do you like the intra-class correlation?
#Handmade in 🇫🇷
In the context of vaccine hesitancy😱, this outstanding research🤩highlights decades of dedicated efforts to develop safe and effective vaccines💉. 🛟🛟🛟
Smallpox eradication to modern innovations,
👀 history and rigorous processes behind these life-saving tools.
FREE!
academic.oup.com/cid/issue/81...
Masterclass présentation by Prof. Anne-Genevieve Marcelin on new ART @eacsociety.bsky.social #EACS2025Paris
NO SEAT AVAILABLE!
#IDSky #HIVSky
Trop de haine pour que ça tienne
Let’s go dismantle the methodological puzzle of the link btw InSTI and cardiometabolic risk among #PWH at #SynergieResistance #Aix_en_provence
The thème is Gardian of the Galaxy!
#RESPOND #SwissCohort #HIV_Causal
Exactement! Lamelles = danger pour le néophyte
En évitant ceux à lamelles, ça réduit fortement le risque…
Il reste bolets et cèpes !
Table 2. Incidence of RSV-Associated Secondary End Points in RSV Season 1.
RSV remains a severe infection in infants and children. In this report, data on the activity of clesrovimab, a long-lasting RSV monoclonal antibody, are described as compared with palivizumab. Full interim results for the SMART phase 3 trial: nej.md/4poVkDE
#MedSky #IDSky #PedSky
This challenge could be repeated 😂
based on mood or surroundings
Rock b6, then Q takes K
Sometimes correlation does not mean causation
Sometimes outlier does not improve precision
Sometimes it does.
Lovely!
Racoon in French is **raton laveur**
*Laveur* means "washer" from the observed behavior of raccoons, which often handle their food near water, giving the impression that they are "washing" it
Always a pleasure to help the french speaking community
Just tag my name and SuperStat JJ 🦸♂️ will be there from 🇫🇷 for R💙R💜
😊
Looks like ppl on IV Tx were more severe?
CID: Background HIV Incidence in PURPOSE 1 and 2 PrEP trials
Jean-Jacques Parienti
HIV incidence among low-adherence oral PrEP users in PURPOSE 1 and 2 closely matched or slightly exceeded background HIV incidence
bit.ly/4ltz5JO
But I agree w you it is not straightforward when you do not practice stat methodology daily.
Because it is around 50% (👀 @ the 95% CI rather than point estimate) this result is perfectly consistant with the similar clinical success (i.e. NI for secondary endpoint).
W Dalba, you avoid central venous access, as u said« which are not risk-free spigot » (quote from my mentor Len Mermel!)
Oh, wow!
The vaccine to this wrong belief is:
Au are talking about the probability for Dalba to be superior to SOC on the DOOR outcome.
As a poker player, I am well trained to the prob of having the best hand.
Hands w <50% is not good in heads-up @paulsaxmd.bsky.social
Think of the discrimination index for a diagnostic test. The cut-off for the area under the ROC curve to be useful is 50%
Yes.
But the authors also provided efficacy results (secondary outcome) in a more traditional way, i.e. Risk Difference and 95% CI btw the 2 randomized arms, and had computed a NI margin a priori, Albert underpowered😉
It seems they have done all this for ppl who like to keep the door closed
This is was I did & bHIV underestimated the risk of HIV (conservative)
😉👏👍
What if comparing :
🔵 background #HIV incidence (MODEL)
to
🔴 HIV incidence (REAL) among ppl w low-level adherence to oral #PrEP (<2💊/wk by DBS- unprotected)
in PURPOSE trials?
👇🏾👇🏽👇🏻👇
academic.oup.com/cid/advance-...
🇫🇷 I generally reply in french question asked in french
♟️Like in chess openings, the back defense is driven by the white first moves? 😉😉
Ty for nice words😊