"When the Criminal Investigations Bodily Samples Act was first passed in 1995 it allowed compulsory samples only from people who were charged with offences with at least seven years jail time as the maximum. In 2011 this act was amended to lower the threshold to cover people charged with any imprisonable offence. “I’ve read [the] Police operational guidelines and they contain nothing about Bill of Rights entitlement to protest, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and so on. This looks like a clear case of Police making use of a power that they have in a way that it was never intended to be used. It looks like they are doing it to intimidate people engaged in political protest and dissent. It should be restricted to its original purpose of investigating and detecting perpetrators of serious crimes. This is a good example of why judicial oversight of DNA sample should be required unless there are exceptional circumstances."
Our message remains clear: “so long as our aerospace industry remains dependent on the United States Military and complicit in genocide, there are growing numbers of people willing to stand up and take action”
Human rights lawyer David Small’s analysis of police’s misuse of power to intimidate protesters is vital for our changing environment in Aotearoa right now. It’s crucial to be aware of how police violence is used in our country.
#nzpol