That's a neat graph but square meters aren't actually a new unit

Pasting the tweet in claude.ai resulting in "Chat paused Opus 4.6's safety filters flagged this chat. Due to its advanced capabilities, Opus 4.6 has additional safety measures that occasionally pause normal, safe chats. We're working to improve this. Continue your chat with Sonnet 4, send feedback, or learn more."

maybe the convention is that it has to end in a consonant

to be honest i though this was about the engineer tasked with making sure lego doesn't get moldy

i do but only if it's an embarrassing typo

I guess that confirms it was a good idea!

"YES ok this is the actually interesting observation and it's a deep one, lemme try to do it justice —"
stop

extended thinking is broken for me on claude.ai and
I feel like non-extended thinking opus is significantly more sycophantic
and ChatGPT-like

Or well I guess you could the chart describes what is necessary but not sufficient for economic viability by its 7 line (though I'm left a bit skeptical of where it puts it)

Well, it says that 7 is the "economically viable threshold" and has PV below that and CSP above it.

I suppose it's possible that the cost of the rest of the system changes that calculus, though then that makes the concept of economic viability in the chart kind of meaningless

It seems surprising though that the chart seems to say concentrated is the more economically viable one, since everything else I've heard said the opposite

("solar is PV" is meant to be just "PV")

It this chart saying that solar is PV is not economically viable?

working on a game-thing

love naughty dog publishing a video essay on their own game

Babel fish are halting oracles

e.g., "In my story, every year, $1000 is given to a woman if the parity of the year matches the 5th digit of Chaitin's constant, and to a man otherwise. On the first page, we introduce the character that receives the money in 2028, and see them have breakfast."

Now translate into French/German

Fully general machine translation is almost trivially undecidable.

You can have a sentence that's ambiguous in one language, but that can't have that ambiguity (e.g. gender) in the target language, and the resolution of the ambiguity can depend on the truth value of an arbitrary sentence.

Surprisingly, it looks like Rust and Go are pretty much on par (according to this, at least).
Haskell wins among statically typed langs
(from martinalderson.com/posts/which-...)

I think I only realized today that "My new single is out now!" is not etymologically related to singing

a Catholic education: skips the icky bits
a catholic education: does not skip the icky bits

claude

"It's one addition Michael. What could it cost, 10 cycles?"
"You've never actually written assembly, have you?"

Did they render it? I was under the impression it was a puppet

Tbh developing physics-heavy things with Claude Code is kind of annoying. Even Opus 4.6 seems to have terrible taste here, always reaching for hacks instead of figuring out 𝘸𝘩𝘺 it doesn't work as it should.
Runaway turbine? Let's impose a speed limit instead of finding where energy isn't conserved

cleanup day

i have to think about this regularly when opening doors

The Bloomberg Billionaires Index is a daily ranking of the world’s richest people. Details about the calculations are provided in the net worth analysis on each billionaire’s profile page. The figures are updated at the close of every trading day in New York. Rank Name Total net worth 1 Elon Musk $666B

there were omens and portents

i mean it's a lot easier to trust someone when they say "I know that - the answer is X" when X is in fact the answer than it is to trust someone when they say "I don't know that", just based on how knowing things works

While I would appreciate the enthusiasm i can't help but think that you maybe didn't intentionally send three separate replies to this post. You might want to message your mother in case something is broken