Q Can you explain -- 4 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. 5 BY MS. BOLGER: 6 Q Can you explain to me what it means to say 7 to her that "the Arby's in her pants"? 8 A Well, Arby's -- 9 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. 10 BY MS. BOLGER: 11 Q Answer the question. 12 A Arby's sells roast beef. 13 Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were 14 talking about "the Arby's in her pants"? 15 A Well, it's just a -- an expression. 16 Q What is the expression trying to convey? 17 A It conveys the reason why she got a divorce 18 by her own admission. 19 Q Because she had roast beef in her pants? 20 A Yeah. 21 Q She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's 22 what you're trying to say there? You're literally 0339 Case 5:24-cv-00625-JSM-PRL Document 100 Filed 07/31/25 Page 152 of 228 PageID 2000 7367930_unsynchronized.txt[7/29/25, 12:28:40 PM] 1 saying she put Arby's in her pants? 2 A I'm saying she literally -- it's so 3 ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in 4 her pants. Yes. 5 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. 6 BY MS. BOLGER: 7 Q You're not making a slur about her? 8 A No. 9 Q You're literally saying she put an Arby's 10 sandwich in her pants; is that right? 11 A Yes. That's correct. That's correct. 12 Q Why are you laughing? 13 A Because I just think it's so funny. 14 Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's

But do treat yourself to the depo transcript where Loomer explained that she *really did* think Marjorie Taylor Greene got divorced because she put a roast beef sandwich in her pants.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Teehee

I trust the Catholic Church more than a crank AI tool that says everything is AI and is unfalsifiable. Also the dude that wrote it doesn’t even know the difference between affect and effect. You’ve been had by AI-slop and the people that peddle it.

What a fucking hack man. Their “research” is shoddy at best, and does not work at all for short form works like tweets! You also don’t fucking know English yourself.

The pope is not using AI and if you actually believe this crap there’s no hope for your future. The wildly inaccurate AI company will flag something as being 100% AI if you use the word “legacy”.

1) AI detection tools are scams and consistently return false positives, that’s kinda how AI works
2) it’s effect not affect

I love this. One of my favorite parts of writing for Eater was telling snobby commenters that locals should go eat at the tourist trap places now and again because a lot of them are tourist traps for a reason! DiNics? Yes indeed! Jim's? Absolutely!

Dying in office because you insisted on clinging to power until the very end instead of letting a new generation of leaders rise should be seen for the shameful, egomaniacal act that it is.

Salt Lake City has almost twice as many registered Dems as Republicans. But for decades, the districts have been drawn to each take a slice of the city and suburbs.

Utah democrats have suffered for years without any representation in Congress despite controlling the state’s population center.

Just as Republican politicians never seem to have any sympathy for people suffering from a disease or discrimination until someone in their immediate family feels it, they'll never be opposed to gerrymandering until it darkens their own door.

“1000 or 62mil it doesn’t matter” like actually it really does matter? That’s such a huge discrepancy.

thinking abt this bc there is currently a controversy on tiktok where people are misreading and spreading a statistic from this article, saying that 62 million men were either in or interested in a telegram chat about drugging and raping their female partners when really it was like 1000 people max

TikTok screencap. A commenter says she lived in Pennsylvania for ten years before she realized she was supposed to be paying local income taxes.

Some of you need to suck it up and pay the $90 for TurboTax.

So thanks for proving my point dipshit. When comparing single source forms of electricity production, coal is still the largest and will be for some time. It’s almost like you refuse to read.

Literally all I said was what he said was factually correct. You’re a fucking dumbass.

I love how you’re completely ignoring what is actually being said and just making shit up.

GALLEGO: Earlier today, you told Sec. Kennedy that Trump never demanded you to cut interest rates. Is that your sworn testimony?

WARSH: That is, senator.

GALLEGO: Okay. Well someone here is lying then. Because Trump confirmed he pressed you on interest rate cuts.

I'll be honest with you, people don't like Keir on the door but it's not over this Mandelson thing. They don't like him personally

Great news boss, this Mandelson stuff isn’t cutting through on the doorstep because they already think you’re a cunt

He literally said he was talking about world wide electricity sources. And not “until recently” it still is and won’t be caught for a long time. Combining renewables is a misleading argument when goal is by itself, otherwise you should combine all non-renewables too.

And I said that where?

1) this combines all sources of renewables which is a misleading argument to use against this specific claim.
2) in this field, there’s a difference between “power” sources and “electricity” sources, that’s why he said electricity. Coal still beats on electricity.

He’s probably correct. Like coal is the source of more than 30% of the world’s electricity production, gas is the next largest at like 23%. It’ll take a while for any single source renewable to get anywhere near those levels.

I mean coal is the largest source of electricity world wide unless you combine every non-fossil fuel source together. So he’s probably correct.

Coal is the largest source of electricity production world wide…

Coal is currently the largest source of electricity world wide by quite a lot. He’s actually probably correct.

Donald Trump is very unpopular and being seen as opposing Donald Trump in clear moral terms is an almost instant path to political and cultural relevance.

Classic

Update: epistaxis

I am sick