I for one always believed you were a narcissist and the latest gig was just a way to get more media attention.

Maybe they weren’t as excited about supporting genocide as you were?

Well at least we now know what losing campaigns think of non voters.

Press will get Will Stancil press coverage.

It speaks to the criminal nature of Democrats that most of the evil fuckers who armed and funded the Saudi genocide against Sudan under Obama were rehired to arm and fund the genocide in Gaza under Biden.

It depends who his opponent is. If it’s Kamala all bets are off.

He likes telling women what to do.

Will Stancil outspent his opponent and still lost and came to the conclusion that money in politics isn’t important.

The other conclusion would have been that no amount of money would make people like him.

Will Stancil outspent his opponent and still lost and came to the conclusion that money in politics isn’t important.

The other conclusion would have been that no amount of money would make people like him.

If a candidate came to you they’d be asking for advice about how to lose.

To believe this shit that Bill Pencil is spreading you would have to believe that it’s just a funny coincidence that the same people taking millions of dollars from AIPAC also happen to suddenly be OK with burning children alive in their hospital beds.

I’m totally familiar with him. Been watching him crawl into that account whenever he’s getting his ass whooped for years.

Bill Pencil is the kind of guy who thinks money in politics isn’t a big deal and that AIPAC is a big nothing burger but he’s VERY concerned that a leftist candidate is using donations for mutual aid.

Be aware that you are arguing with Wills sock puppet account who shows up whenever he’s getting his ass handed to him in an argument.

Yeah! That would be like taking money from AIPAC and NOT using it to support genocide.

But it was OK for AOC to give her campaign donations to Conor fucking Lamb?

Yeah. This would be like a candidate taking AIPAC money and not using it to promote genocide.

You mean like when a candidate takes money from AIPAC they need to make sure it gets used to guarantee continued arming of genocide?

🦗🦗

🦗

I didn’t support Kat, jackass.

I agree. He is a losing loser who loses.

Hes also an evil prick who defends genocide as long as it’s his candidate sending the bombs.

So it’s OK when AIPAC gives the donations for the purpose of continuing genocide as long as the candidates vote to continue genocide as promised.

Now I understand.

Thanks so much.

Why are you just parroting Wills argument that I was clearly being sarcastic in response to?

It’s funny how “concerned” with the minutiae of campaign finance Will Stancil is but when it comes to the laws against arming and funding a genocide he thinks they aren’t that important.

Too bad he didn’t win though.

So when you raised all that money planning to win an election but lost that was illegal?

You are also not remotely qualified to assess what it takes to win an election.

In the internets defense you are probably even more likely to find a story like that these days than back then.

I have a 14 year old kid and I sometime try to explain to him that when I was his age me and my friends would sometimes ask our parents a question and they would answer “who knows?” And we would all just go about our day not knowing.