Pretty obvious to anyone who doesnât just watch the market run up every day.
Itâs just a math equation at the end of the day, but some greedy people donât want to hear that because it would interrupt their gambling addiction.
Posts by Aron Wegner
Once again, this is why I wish I was old enough to have traded the dot com bubble.
History always repeats itself, especially when itâs mathematically forced to.
They will eventually have to care** lol
They should care about the Strait though.
And thatâs why you canât chase a bubble.
Which is why markets arenât right.
Didnât know everyone was a mind reader all of a sudden.
Youâre** x2
Not at all actually, just tired of seeing people act like they know what theyâre talking about when they donât.
Lol we didnât have full capitulation. Oil is 30% higher since pre-war and we still donât have a resolution. Oh and rates are higher. Donât see a stimulus package anywhere. Have the private credit issues magically gone away?
How does that all result in multiple expansion or earnings growth?
If thatâs the case, then markets shouldnât be back to the areas where they were pre-war, nor should they be moving so much on a priced-in headline.
But alas, markets donât function normally anymore and we donât want to have that discussion
Iâm still sticking to this â22 market analog for now.
Semis lead and QQQs overly concentrated to them, so makes sense that the bounce is a bit overdone, relative to â22, but once the market wakes up to the real effects of higher input prices (similar to â22), the drawdown will probably ensue.
All of this is also being driven by low liquidity / volume, which makes me think that the snap back is just going to be much worse unfortunately
I guess if the AI bots are taking over the world and humanity we wonât need oil, reasonably priced food, jet fuel. So it all makes sense
www.ft.com/content/7fd5...
Surely not a drag on earnings either.
I think we need to be a bit more pragmatic on what the market is now (gambling, with no end in sight), and less inclined to rationalize it. Doing so only adds dangerous fuel to an already horrific fire.
Markets knew COVID existed, but refused to accept reality until it started showing up in the US.
And none of the remote estimates are positive for the economy with the current stagflationary backdrop.
So yes, I donât know why the majority of market participating are acting like this other than the fact they donât know any better (greed, which the POTUS teaches them pretty damn well i guess)
The only way to convince someone itâs prudent to full risk on invest right now is to have insider information on how and when the war will end, what full post-war supply looks like, when that will be, and how much of a cushion economies have until then.
No one has any of that.
Of course there is. But youâre still gambling on many unknown quantities (when the Strait will open, with how much quantity, at what pace it will come online at, etc.) versus imo truly investing or hedging a marketing that has gotten ahead of itself because of the actual known quantities.
IMO, we are in the eye of the hurricane or the waiting game for a tsunami to hit.
The proof is in the existing paid prices data and current energy levels. Itâs just a matter of how others want to make sense of it. Justify a higher multiple? So be it. but that doesnât seem too wise to do
I would love to have the optimism that others have in this world. But the realities that Iâm witnessing canât possibly be the same as those that are using them to âinvest.â It would go against every single risk management protocol out there.
Why is there so much backwardation when the Strait is still closed and many oil fields in the region (including 17% of the worlds largest natural gas plant for the next 5 years) are blown to shit?
So maybe youâre right. Maybe I donât think oil traders are as sophisticated as others do.
All this eventually hits every part of the economic ecosystem. And if it doesnât, that means the global economy has slowed to a halt.
3) the economy is not in a place to support a staglfationary environment (every recent data point reflecting this) where oil is at $90+ for a sustained period of time.
So all that taken into consideration, the market putting their weight behind the guy who has bankrupt many business is interesting
2) real crude prices paid are reported to be much higher to what spot crude is trading at. Maybe if we stopped the insider trading in the oil futures weâd figure that one out.
But I do know that $65 oil isnât returning soon without a growth slowdown and markets donât seem to care - irrational
1) many retail traders who âbuy every dipâ have never been burned in the way they imo ought to be because they are gambling not investing - irrational. They only know one mode when they have the capital to deploy
A 2-10% real tariff tax (depending on where you get your data) on the consumer supported by a strong economy, is not the same as an energy supply shock causing a 30%+ increase in energy input costs (another, more severe tax on the consumer), with no end in sight. Supported by a weaker economy.
An energy supply shock that is still ongoing, with no clear end in sight (where if you know anything about narcissism, youâll know very clearly why that is)