Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by madeline odent

she started it by offering me a wooden children’s toy as a stick! play fey games, get fey prizes

3 hours ago 28 0 0 0

I think you’ll find that they may be human but they’re actually HER babies

according to her

3 hours ago 10 0 0 0
She’s flumped on the ground under the high chair, moping

She’s flumped on the ground under the high chair, moping

that one got her another treat but it did not get her the pasta I was eating so she’s aware that the bargain has been upheld but she’s not happy about it

3 hours ago 121 1 3 0

never, she's wasting away, both of the human children are now bigger than her which is clearly a problem,

3 hours ago 17 0 1 0
She’s now two feet closer but still doing it

She’s now two feet closer but still doing it

she saw me making fun of her and decided to move closer. just in case I couldn’t see her properly

3 hours ago 139 2 5 0
A corgi looking pitiful with a kids puzzle piece in her mouth

A corgi looking pitiful with a kids puzzle piece in her mouth

She’s dropped the piece (it’s a wooden alligator thing) on the ground

She’s dropped the piece (it’s a wooden alligator thing) on the ground

Now she’s picked it up again

Now she’s picked it up again

And dropped it again, complete with the most pitiful puppy eyes you’ve ever seen

And dropped it again, complete with the most pitiful puppy eyes you’ve ever seen

progression of a poor starving corgi who has never had a treat in her entire life and certainly not three chews in the past hour but hopes that if she drops the best stick she could find on the floor loud enough, maybe I will give her a scrap

3 hours ago 264 11 15 0

brother: oh hey u guys are back early
me: Harris Teeter's haunted
brother: what?
astronaut: *loading a pistol and getting in the ECTO-1V* Harris Teeter's haunted.

4 hours ago 95 21 0 0
Advertisement

there's really just quite a lot of screaming at this age, isn't there

3 hours ago 2 0 1 0

that’s because you’re having shitty gnocchi

5 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Yeah. Classic probate uncanny valley

5 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Yes this is where I learned it!!!

7 hours ago 4 0 0 0

hey did you know that before Italy had potatoes, gnocchi were made with cheese?

we should bring that back

7 hours ago 286 10 28 1

what is the charge. what crime has been done

8 hours ago 4406 919 119 18
Post image
5 days ago 17779 5833 79 107

Omg

10 hours ago 5 0 0 0
Advertisement

we have hit the “I dress myself!” stage of toddlerhood and god it is hilarioud

13 hours ago 250 2 10 0

Nah that’s pure disney

13 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Sir.

14 hours ago 4 0 1 0

This is the single funniest thing I have ever seen Bluesky staff do.

2 days ago 14400 5681 43 78

Omg hi

15 hours ago 13 1 0 0

I mean okay I’m ngl that’s exactly what the ladies loos at a nightclub are like, yeah

15 hours ago 9 0 0 0

that’s the amount of sofa flopping I would like to do

18 hours ago 6 0 0 0
Tribunal excerpt:
After carefully considering all the evidence, the Tribunal found that Dr Wolverson had made the request for Mrs Q to remove her face veil immediately or very soon after Mrs Q had sat down at the start of the consultation. He had made the request as it was his usual practice to do so, not because he had struggled to understand what Mrs Q was saying. The Tribunal rejected the suggestion that the request was made because Mrs Q had a strong accent. The Tribunal concluded that, in making the request, Dr Wolverson had made no attempt to make any form of assessment about whether removing the face veil was necessary and whether it served any purpose. This finding was consistent with the evidence of Mrs Q, Ms T and the oral evidence of Dr Wolverson himself, when he said that he had made the request after as little being said as ‘good morning’. It was also consistent with Dr Wolverson’s general practice, as he had described in oral evidence.

Tribunal excerpt: After carefully considering all the evidence, the Tribunal found that Dr Wolverson had made the request for Mrs Q to remove her face veil immediately or very soon after Mrs Q had sat down at the start of the consultation. He had made the request as it was his usual practice to do so, not because he had struggled to understand what Mrs Q was saying. The Tribunal rejected the suggestion that the request was made because Mrs Q had a strong accent. The Tribunal concluded that, in making the request, Dr Wolverson had made no attempt to make any form of assessment about whether removing the face veil was necessary and whether it served any purpose. This finding was consistent with the evidence of Mrs Q, Ms T and the oral evidence of Dr Wolverson himself, when he said that he had made the request after as little being said as ‘good morning’. It was also consistent with Dr Wolverson’s general practice, as he had described in oral evidence.

It's worth highlighting (because we've all seen the 'outrage'), the question was not "does a request for a patient to remove their veil amount to serious misconduct"?

Obviously not.

The question was "was it appropriate IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES?"

14/

1 day ago 197 9 3 0

Hell yeah

18 hours ago 9 0 0 0

Get his ass

18 hours ago 279 23 2 0
Advertisement

omg

18 hours ago 3 0 0 0

Title?

18 hours ago 0 0 1 0

Yeah actually thinking of it I can’t really think of a specific term for them. Figures, at a pinch?

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

we call them grotesques now but yeah fair, at the time they were just called ‘divers decorations” or such

1 day ago 2 0 1 0

Lmaoooo I think that’s the curse of publishing, you find all the stuff you want to fix

1 day ago 2 0 0 0