We now have a fully fledged multi-party array, operating within a two party voting system arena, which means every individual constituency contest can be influenced by street based activism - isn't it time for progressive parties to collaborate and maximise this means of stopping ReformUK?
Posts by Peter Davidson
Sadly, our not fit for purpose voting system means HOW you vote is more or less meaningless; it's WHERE you vote that really counts! With a half decent voting system to elect MPs (Single Transferable Vote anyone?) you could express a nuanced range of preferences to accurately reflect your wishes?
A step in the right direction but SV represents only a very small step - I am opposed in principle to the Mayoral model for local governance. What the UK really needs is root and branch constitutional reform, including the potential for the UK to go Federal?
Great article for SE - The Trump inspired debacle has confirmed what most thoughtful Europeans have been saying for years - Europe must renew its commitment to relentless integration, replete with single defence strategy and associated military industrial complex www.socialeurope.eu/america-is-g...
Please support/sign the petition calling for a National Commission on Electoral Reform actionstorm.org/petitions/nc...
Finally, decades late, direct services from St. Pancras to Bordeaux, Zurich, München, Köln and places en-route would mean UKbased travellers no longer reliant on seemingly ubiquitous short-haul air, unleashing the potential of a burgeoning continental HSR network? www.theguardian.com/business/202...
30th Jan provides an opportunity to make your voice heard - contact your MP, ask them to attend the Commons debate on voting reform - MPs need to be told; voters want electoral reform!
www.parliament.uk/business/new...
@westcountryvoices.bsky.social; @peterstefanovic.bsky.social; @cornwalllive.com
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Insanely short termist (until next GE!) analysis from Tim Farron - yes, the LibDems know exactly how to game the current system for maximum gain but his conclusions ignore the fundamentally dysfunctional role of FPTP!
Are the new Parliamentary seat projections worth paying attention to? NOT really, given the narrative routinely ascribed to 'hung' General Election results?
"The model estimates that an election today would produce a highly fragmented and unstable Parliament with 5 parties holding over 30 seats."
@Chris Van Tulleken: "I do not care what you eat......I believe that everyone should have the opportunity, freedom and information to do what is best for them."
Agreed - informed choice is vital but facts (about food) is exactly what the food industry prevents?
www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle...
Devolution, across provincial England is a sham - the most credible, sustainable solution to the UK's deeply entrenched, centralised state apparatus is to go Federal, replete with codified constitution - a bit like the one GB created for post WWII Germany? www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000...
Great result for common sense (and reformers) today, even though the Bill proposed by Sarah Olney will not go any further but it does raise the profile of Electoral Reform and symbolises relentlessly increasing public support witnessed over the past few decades www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Agreed George - the difference here being the "Free Vote" protocol attached to the Commons debate, allowing MPs to express their views, free from party whips and even, shock horror, consult with their constituents before entering the division lobbies - Parliamentary democracy functioning correctly?
Kudos to #ZoeWilliams spurning all attempts to push her on to short haul airborne travel links during her recent visit to Köln - www.theguardian.com/commentisfre.... Our rail journey, to visit Photokina fair back in 2018, also had its problems but they were on the UK side of La Manche!
“The keys are premised on the proposition that a rational, pragmatic electorate decides whether the White House party has governed well enough to get another four years,”
I think I've spotted where you went wrong - the US electorate is no longer rational or pragmatic?