My cherry blossom.

Good work, mine has certainly blossomed earlier over the last ten years based on my photo dates.

My cherry tree blossom.

Good work, mine has certainly bloomed earlier in the last 10 years.

The uk free to view channels cycle TOS, TNG. DSN9, voyager, occasionally enterprise. Didn't renew my paramount subscription so living on whatever appears.

As cheesy as 60s star trek was it's surprisingly cathartic as background watching.

For good or bad, the uk cannot afford to loose another chemical manufacturer. It's the bedrock or what manufacturering remains in the uk and similar is happening in Europe.

High oil price just encourages companies to shift as much energy as feasible to a lower more static cost power source. Short term profits for the oil companies but it just pushes everything in the same direction. Moral of the story, don't be the one with the stranded assets at the end.

Love is in the air!

Boing!

Giorgia Meloni to Vance at the Winter Olympics opening ceremony. #olympics

I do hope those tech companies are not 'too big to fail'

They didn't deserve that one at the end against them.

Was this planned for Penguin awareness day by any chance?

Italian voice actor Carlo Bononi was the voice of all of the characters on Pingu. A trained clown by trade, he used a theater technique called grammelot, which consists of "speaking" in a mix of babbled gibberish noises. He improvised all the voices live and unscripted.

Nothing specific, I started when I spotted a paper on arxiv about detectgpt, the code (no longer updated) is available on github. There are a lot of offerings available, obviously the saas services have the revenue model so can fund the improvementls. But I did find this ranking:

raid-bench.xyz

I think you misunderstood.

In actual fact, you could have just looked at my profile and Google'd what ai is doing to the cyber industry at the moment. It's not exactly promising, especially to blue teamers, so seeing how other industries control it has merit.

But there was nothing to see here.

No, that is what i put in my first post.

I do have some interest around approaches to control the ML spread. Especially where it can be used in othet sectors. But from what I'm reading this was more a vague social media statement. Which is fine, but not what I was looking for.

One address at a time, we'll get there.

Ah I see what you mean, I must admit I was thinking of it more from a producing a peice of work, point of view. Interesting approach, it would definitely lower the barrier to do it (cheap, easy etc...)

Well there is that. ;)

Though I have no fallen down a rabbit hole of looking at open source ai detectors. There's quite a few out there but it does look like a bit of arms race.

Surprising amount of saas offerings but I think that has probably come about for education and fake CV scanning.

I didn't, I just asked how they'd do it. I thought maybe policy plus attestation, supported with examples etc.. maybe something else.

Tech is one solution, but as you say has overhead i did wonder if they'd use one of the online ai scanners. Though some are ai themselves so might be avoided.

Clearly they said no to everything ai. As it is increasingly difficult depending on the products people use I was purely curious on their approach

I expected a easy reply like, here is the policy. However some people appear to have taken this personally as if their is an evil motive.

I think you have completely missread everything. No one has said innovative computer technology, except you.

It mostly a narrative thing, people now what they want to get annoyed about.

That's the approach I expected them to take. But based on other comments, it seems maybe.

One that has been around a while which I figured may have had something in place. It's not just a popup publisher.

Based on their tone, it felt like they may have a plan. Some publishers allow limited use (e.g. grammar) some far more restrictive as this sounded, so it was of interest.

For instance if you look at something like NetBSD Commit Guidelines. They restrict and detail specific tools but that is all around code generation and doesn't cover other topics or idea generation.

I wouldn't say benevolent as such, but I would consider how it can be used elsewhere. However if they had been using something of a wider scale it would have been useful to review and possibly adapt.

That is what caught my attention, noting the research ban, I thought they might mean just testing.

Very much so, I was somewhat hoping there was a nascent open approach being developed. There has been some talk for open source but I've seen almost nothing commercially or on thr creative side.

It can be used elsewhere, much is currently around attestation from the provider or in a open projects through their identity. Quite often backed by a policy, I read recently one that listed explicitly tools and general concepts. Automated approaches are currently limited but growing in use.

Yes that's what I was thinking, probably something policy based. I've seen one for the automotive industry but relatively little that's particularly innovative.