I don't recall you sending me this, but I did find my way to it from Valter Moretti's paper. It's very neat!

I remember a long time ago complaining to you that P_ψ : x -->《ψ|Φ(x)|0》is not additive and can't be a probability measure. Maybe thats okay, if it is approximately additive on some scale!

As well, there's an existence question. Is it clear that maximizing a C^r atlas in the C^r category will yield any smooth transition functions?

Don't you need some argument that there's only one such subset? Being C^r is a relationship between two charts, not a quality of any one chart; i.e., it is about transition maps. A priori there might be two pools of intra-smoothly-related maps.

Well, I'm 30. My goal was to understand QFT by this time, and I think I have failed, unfortunately. I have learned a lot since last year, and there's a little bit of life still to live, so here's to learning a little bit more.

how old is b?

what project?

ah, well..

the most real sense in which this is true is probably paying taxes to genocidal governments

holy shit good idea i will have indian food

oh, wow! this reminds me of something similar i saw once in the karst mountains of china

(the scattering products, that is)

straight outta compton

And what a beautiful rock it is! Is this here the Window Rock?

so no

I am maybe the most scattered person that has ever been alive

Tacey thats so cool

what kinda crystals they got

i have been doing a lot of thinking about relativistic localization

that's so cool 😌

ur so cool

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

what are the yarn and scissors for

what gains are you gaining?

whats the open problem??

I'm sure you've all been wondering why I gathered you here this afternoon. I need you to submit a #MathCoffeeSelfie and let me know what you've been working on.

one time i opened a great big binder of my mech-eng brother's handwritten class notes and it said "ENG365: Introduction to Bending" and thats the funniest thing I've ever seen

i love books with obscenely specific-sounds titles. there is a big thick book called "primes of the form n2 + km2" and thats great.

archimedes dropped "quadrature of the parabola" with 24 whole propositions and that was baller of him

scared ya

bonkers

He's totally right about the superiority of the Peierels bracket and stuff, but i have no idea what supermanifolds are and it scared me off. Why can't he write at exactly the level of abstraction I like??

If you read and digest it you should give us a seminar on it 😁

it unlocks some optional content in a new area