On the one hand this is a matter of join the queue.
On the other a matter of ignoring it and hoping the storm will pass.
Posts by Jeffrey H. Michaels
Congrats!
Deterring with words? It’s cheaper, faster—and just as vital.
A new guide by HCSS strategic advisor @jmichael424.bsky.social explores how NATO and others have used (and misused) verbal warnings, from WWI to Ukraine.
📝 Read more:
hcss.nl/news/new-rep...
Not the most important point, but in the spirit of social media self-promotion going to note that cool stuff happens @maxwellsu.bsky.social & the Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs even in the summer.
Great piece @michaelwilliams.bsky.social & @jmichael424.bsky.social
If so, they've chosen a rather cryptic way of communicating it. Between the SDR and the Sunday Times story that preceded it, the government seems to prefer the trial balloon approach rather than making a firm commitment.
Very much hope you can follow this with a study on the contemporary utility of the bayonet
@thewavellroom.bsky.social kindly published my article on small arms and the challenges facing those British Army officers working on replacing SA80 as part of Project GRAYBURN.
wavellroom.com/2025/06/11/t...
🚨 The latest HCSS report by strategic advisor @jmichael424.bsky.social is recommended by Retd Army Major General @warinthefuture.bsky.social Mick Ryan as one of the top five war and national security reads of the week:
🚨 Why do deterrence efforts fail? Often, it’s not what is said, but how it’s said.
New report by HCSS strategic advisor @jmichael424.bsky.social explores the power—and pitfalls—of deterrence warning messages.
📘 Read more:
hcss.nl/report/deter...
I'm delighted to share my latest paper - "Deterrence Warning Messages: A Short Guide for NATO" - published by @hcss.bsky.social
hcss.nl/wp-content/u...
@shashj.bsky.social @luissimonn.bsky.social @ldfreedman.bsky.social @nktpnd.bsky.social @osinga.bsky.social @warmatters.bsky.social
Rather curious use of the word 'expected':
"The externally-led review is expected to recommend that our Armed Forces move to warfighting readiness to deter the growing threats faced by the UK. The report makes 62 recommendations, which the government is expected to accept in full."
🚨 Words matter: from WWI to Ukraine, poorly delivered warnings have often led to deterrence failure.
Coming this week: a new HCSS report by @jmichael424.bsky.social shows how NATO can get deterrence right—starting with communication.
PS: I'm not sure how feasible this was in any event
Always a tricky balance during CW. So much depended on Sov objectives + Sov willingness to initiate nuclear use if they felt opposition too strong. Thus legitimate question of utility of large scale conventional defence but I'd still prefer that option to the alternative.
Quite so although sadly never really replaced with anything better. Approach seems to be 'insufficient and lose' rather than 'insufficient and escalate'. Doubtful 'insufficient and replace' ever taken seriously and never properly resourced.
So much for the Cold War 'deliberate insufficiency' concept of escalating to nuclear use after the army is expended
News agencies swarming to Bolivia to get a comment from Edward Luttwak!
If you can find a version with English subtitles, I can recommend this series: program.imbc.com/5republic
By South Korean standards at any rate