I know, but it was a good opportunity to use the phrase, "you beclowned yourself"

Why is that devious or dishonest?(assuming you don't claim it's your average day).

In my experience pro Se parties, who speak about attorneys like you do, are far more likely to lie (and they always get caught) than represented parties.

Because most lawyers tell their clients not to lie.

Dude you jumped in and accused all lawyers of being communion beings. Claiming that's some sort of good faith engagement is patently absurd. Also how could anyone do anything to set you up at this point. You beclowned yourself in your initial post.

I'm a lawyer. Are you saying that it's a fact (and not just your opinion) that l'm a scummy human who has no conscience whatsoever when it comes to twisting reality and gaslighting people into whatever aligns with my self-interests?

I have no idea. But it seems like one of the places it's failing.

Are you paying for the model that has active memory of your conversation with it in a alway that it can incorporate it.

Also, have you given it a single data stream for game results?

Which part is incorrect?

I don't know, but I think we just did whatever was working in Ukraine. And that's why they do it there.

Requires the drone to be bigger which makes it more susceptible to anti-air defenses

I'll note, I'm someone who believes that AI does have practical uses when applied to closed systems of data. But agents don't figure things out on their own (they need validated data to train on). And you understate the importance of how to query (either through forced limits) or human skill.

This is fine I guess for personal use, but it sounds like your doing quality control to deploy agents for things that either don't have an obvious benefit or to teach you things, which it's hard to quality control for.

I'll point out that the target market for the smartphone was consumers. The target consumer for AI right now is government and large business. And they all believe it is high-impact and are implementing it. I think the consumer product's obvious flaws & limited usefulness distort our view of it.

I understand what you're trying to do ). How are you ensuring it's accurately benchmarking the agents?

How did you go about validating your new benchmark? Is this a task you think AI can do for you or did you hire human help to do it or did you do it yourself?

What is the goal of having your communications dissected like this? It's not a thing you would have otherwise done, how are you using it?

Progressive learning path? Like you're having it teach you things, right? That's not figuring something out. It's just giving you hopefully accurate info.

What are you using an agent for that you don't need to give it a prompt that's well designed to get you a useful output?

It's clear from context I had looked it up, otherwise why would I refer to working in Brooklyn for Chabad firms. When you argue online you don't demand nearly as much reading comprehension from yourself as you demand from those conversing with you.

I looked it up when you posted it. But ex-ante I didn't know what it meant. Who wouldn't look something up like that? I didn't think that needed to be clarified.

I never questioned that happened. Just other than through your post I was unaware of it as a specific event or the term. I was generally aware of Jesse Jackson having a drought history with Jews. Including, I believe some connection to some of the truly violent stuff that happened here in the 80s.

Reagan isn't defined merely as a racist. And Jackson's relationship with Jewish people is a huge (negative) part of his legacy.

It's basically the same standard. It's really bad for both of them. But Reagan is lionized amongst a larger group of people in a way that ignores the racism.

So I think I figured out that this is somehow about speaking at Neshoba County Fair in Mississippi which they both did. It was near the site of the famous murder of 3 civil right activists. Maybe someone used this to criticize Reagan's southern strategy somewhere up the thread.

So I just want to jump in. I spoke to. Jewish friend, who, first wasn't surprised I didn't know it, as Jesse Jackson using it had sort of killed its usage.

But also, it was a more serious slur than a realized. So I don't want to underplay it. Either way, the rest still stands.

So I talk to a Jewish friend, just now, to help contextualize this for me and he informed me it is probably more of a slur than these. But along those lines.

Can't tell if you're calling me a liar or not.

I'm not saying it wasn't more common in 1984, I was 2.

I accept it is a slur, but not really comparable to calling Black people monkeys.

And I have no idea how it excuses or contextualizes it.

I understand, I also looked it up. Hence why it's relevant that I've worked for multiple Chabad led law firms in Brooklyn. Hyman also isn't a common Jewish name. Chaim is very common though, which is pronounce sort of like Hym would be.

It's not the same as referring to Black people as monkeys.

Ok, that's a reasonable take. When I hear "austerity", I hear destroying government services.

Steam engines and cars too

Just treating investment income as regular income could cover 10% of the deficit. And that's at current rates. 99% of that would
Come from the top 1%. Forced realization (at least at death) would raise more. We will need to tax middle class too though.

We can do more than on the margins with tax increases. If we can limit the long term damage there, we might be able to sustainably rebuild America with efficient borrowing and put us on long term fiscal stability once the boomers die out, without austerity type cuts.