fred, who told you to take out the ball gag?

i'm glad you think so, and the world would be lovely if fascist was just an insult. of course if he's not, i'll retract and cheer him on. not that he needs my approval at all, i'm no one important

bluesky's just very pedantic and autistic. sometimes the pull of The Discourse is too powerful and the willpower is too weak. (me)

this dipshit. we already have ideological bans in several immigration acts, which actually should be ruled unconstitutional.

i have to question why people supported/support a drooling clown whose name sounds like fucking chips ahoy

he is keeping immigration law the same. he is still considered nationalist & conservative. he said he won't cut off working with russia, just be measured & pragmatic

the rest of his promises are things fascists regularly promise, then invert

i guess we'll find out who has no clue within a year

what flaming insults?

most of what i'm seeing is people praising magyar's win as a total inversion of orban's rule, which isn't correct, far from

you're doing the exact same thing every party loyalist does. if someone disagrees, just claim they're bad/ bots. it's tiring, really.

magyar is still a fascist, he just doesn't want orban loyalists 🫩

400,000 Arizonans have been kicked off of SNAP since January and the AP is running a story featuring a white woman who thrice voted for Trump and got her feelings hurt by something he said.

they might be "religious" but they're likely calvinists. essentially they believe they alone are chosen, predetermined to go to heaven, and they have no need to seek forgiveness/redemption bc they've already been pre-approved. that's why they do whatever they want and condemn everyone else.

no, go on, i'd like to learn your perspective on the confederates losing the civil war being the south rising

they just won't leave him alone, it's truly insane

fetterman's weird forehead folds

i need someone to explain what expression causes a forehead to have creases like a doodle of flying birds, and what expression causes this fold above someone's brows that doesn't cause creases between the brows??

is it exclusive to miserable, bloodthirsty ogres?

ew why, was he mentioned as an obsessed weirdo?

The evangelicals *literally* held a conference conspiring to do this.

The current attacks on trans rights are 100% a documented, co-ordinated right wing plan.

www.splcenter.org/resources/ha...

A screenshot of a Truthout article by Zane McNeill, dated November 5, 2024. The headline reads, "Republicans Spent Nearly $215M on TV Ads Attacking Trans Rights This Election." Below it is a pull quote: "‘That's $134 per trans person in anti-trans ad spending,’ civil rights attorney Alejandra Caraballo said."

The Trump campaign spent $222 million on anti-trans ads. ADF's budget exceeds $100M. Chris Rufo has openly admitted to manufacturing moral panic as a political strategy. These aren't "conspiracy theories." These are documented facts. Singal dismisses them without ever actually addressing them.

A screenshot of a politics article headline reading, "Fox News posts more articles on trans people than any media outlet in the country. Even queer ones." The subheadline says, "The findings bolster what Democrats have long argued, that it's actually Republicans who are obsessed with trans people." The article is by Molly Sprayregen, dated February 10, 2026.

Fox produced more articles about trans people than any other outlet in the country. More than The Advocate, more than NBC, more than the Post. And that's just one outlet. Kant found right-wing publications collectively dwarf mainstream and even LGBTQ+ media on trans coverage by enormous margins.

a lesser note to add is: the south didn't rise the first time

play the fuckin hits

mfs: "god has a plan for you, god works in mysterious ways"

trans people:

mfs: "no not like that 😡😡😡"

also OpEds ALWAYS traffic in the worst, most absurd opinions and publishing them gives them an air of legitimacy.

people that write OpEds simply have too much free time and no legitimate news source should have them.

maybe i should send an OpEd pitching the end of OpEds lmao

my "bringing not peace, but a sword" is that the hill doesn't have to publish every weirdo with credentials' take

anyway my credentials are that i had to go through catholic school for a couple years & left the church bc of zealotry

god doesn't actually care about your gender, heaven is immaterial

this is a person saying supreme court’s Chiles v. Salazar ruling is good in this morning's @thehill.com OpEd.

these are genuinely disturbing takes btw

also gender therapy and gender affirming care in general (incl for cisgender people) seeks to unite the body and "soul" and is very personal.

a screenshot of amy e. hamilton's article titled “Gender Affirming Professionals” and Transfers of Power: Children and Parents Divided Contra Mundum the article begins with an indented quote: For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and spirit, of joints and marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 the article begins: There is almost no rival to the power that gender ideology seeks to wield. It seeks nothing less than god-like power, using language not to clarify what is real but to divide, disrupt, and disorient. It cleaves body and soul (“gender identity”), bringing not peace but a sword. Gender ideology does not deal in objective material facts or diagnosable physical conditions but presents an alternative worldview about the truth and the nature of the human person. This body-soul disunity [this part of the sentence is cut off] stands in direct opposition to Judeo-Christian anthropology.

the final paragraph of the article continues the rant: Humanity needs to “dismantl[e]” the “choke-hold” of reality. Contra mundum. Gender-affirming professionals, rejecting bodies and the world as it is, ply scalpel and sword, demanding they become as they wish them to be. In the interest of a chimerical project, they divide body and soul, fracture the wholeness of male and female, and disrupt the intimate, natural alliance of fathers and mothers with their sons and daughters. Nothing less than the meaning of the world is at stake. Parents, shields up, and battle on.

why is @thehill.com platforming the "i was almost transed" nonsense with their OpEd on conversion therapy?

she's not an impartial moderate, she's promoting catholic dogma

amy hamilton's sept 2025 article in Humanum, John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage & Family in DC

no real news org should have OpEds and the people that write OpEds have too much free time

lmfao what is thissss, now i gotta look it up

of course it has to be grey. too much contrast and color might be mistaken as invoking a rainbow, which, you know,

I’m fucking crying dude. Asking “pretty please do not introduce a security vulnerability”.

yeah, you just go to the profile and it has a link at the top. that sends you to a post that if you like it, it auto adds you to the list.

The Groups Pushing Anti-Trans Laws Want to Divide the LGBTQ Movement The same people keep pushing bill after bill, developing their strategy as they go.

They openly admitted it in 2017 that this was the plan. Every narrative such as "they're transing the gays" or "the t went too far and is hurting the lgb" is in furtherance of that goal of divide and conquer.

newrepublic.com/article/1654...

nah, the he's a chud that pals around with literal neonazis and sells misogyny to other men. that's about it, he's no deeper than a puddle