My mom had the same Halloween lamp.

Both of us voted yes by mail a month ago.

Because the SCOTUS decreed that he can't be charged while in office.

But eventually the string would break & shut them up. Too bad we can't cut his.

If there's enough profit in it, you bet.

Unconstitutional.

Yet.

So clueless that the thousands of onlookers in the stands now know just how fragile his is.

Phony to the max, so definitely fraud.

And that's what I meant.

No, he definitely hasn't. I don't think he was ever again taken as seriously as he once was.

The joke is that, as some here know, Tiptree was the pen name of Alice Sheldon.

I remember reading "The Screwfly Solution" when it was 1st published in Analog. I'd recheck the title page every couple pages because I kept thinking, "A *man* wrote this???"

Nail polish remover has acetone, but you don't ingest it.

A good man wouldn't have cause to.

Not in scientific usage.

Or, nature has created more than just 2 options. That is what the best evidence shows.

Amazing how that scares some people. You may benefit from thinking about why. And from taking a few science courses.

Bye!

Go look it up, & while you're at it

For the umpteenth time, the issue isn't sex, it's gender. They are not synonyms.

And with that, bye.

Not if they weren't used.

Were you reading the abstract or the actual paper?

Sorry, I thought you meant a different study. Standard practice would be to mention them if they were used.

Exactly, a trans man or woman.

Nope. They have none of the physical characteristics of small babies. But trans women & men when tested show variations in brain structures that align with their perceived gender. I.e., physical characteristics.

ROFL! I was a scientific technical writer for > 35 years. I understand intersex conditions pretty well. And a lot of other science better than you do, judging by your statements so far.

Read it, it's in there.

Since we know Napoleon is dead, no. Not at all similar to what we've been discussing.

Provided they are not intersex, Kleinfelter's or some other genetic abnormality.

Not the opposite sex, the opposite gender. They are 2 different words for a reason. And if their self-perception says they are a different gender, and structures in their brain known to vary by sex align with the gender they perceive -- are they really mistaken?

Why would I when that's not what I'm saying?

Which is only to be expected.

If there are, I haven't seen them. But that's not what I said.