Still time to register for Patricia Pino's Job Guarantee talk, starting in 2 hours! #MMT #JobGuarantee
events.humanitix.com/patricia-pin...
Posts by ChrisB
MMT Richard Murphy recently published a critique of the core policy at the heart of MMT: the Job Guarantee. It was reasoned and balanced, but we believe misrepresented the Job Guarantee in key areas. Here is our response.
"The Bank of England should have the courage to admit that its main policy tool is largely irrelevant in dealing with geopolitical supply shocks and their impacts." #MMT
.@Economist.com writes 1000 words on Green economics without once acknowledging that the UK government issues its own currency. Every claim rests on the "household budget" myth. They couldn't get it more wrong if they tried. #MMT archive.is/RdqQb
Britain's water companies paid out billions in dividends while the pipes rotted. Now we're told we can't afford to fix them.
The engineers exist. The materials exist. The need is real.
What's missing isn't money.
Britain isn't broke. It's blocked.
Labour, Reform, Coservatives and LibDems all offer different flavours of Thatcher's neoliberalism which has been damaging people and services for decades. It is only the Green Party that offers a different economic view that would allow us to have the infrastructure and services we want.
#MMT
A must attend event for all MMT fans!
Finally, a group that will tell it how it is on economics.
#MMT
NHS
We can't afford the unaffordability myth... #MMT
medium.com/@malcolmreav...
Why do so many #Marxists dismiss #ModernMonetaryTheory as capital apologia? #MMT is a lens, not an ideology! #JobGuarantee is a superior path vs #UBI to build #WorkingClass power. Ep. ft. @_awda_ drops Sat. 1/24 @ 8AM ET. Find all our ep. @ realprogressives.org/macro-n-cheese/
MMT threatens vested interests in the economy and in economics, that's why we can't talk about it.
This is great from @spborden.bsky.social #MMT
open.substack.com/pub/susanbor...
This old article misrepresents MMT's Job Guarantee by conflating design choices with economic constraints. Currency-issuing governments aren't limited to minimum-wage make-work - they can set living wages and fund meaningful public purpose work. Sorry. #MMT
mmtaction.com/articles/sha...
Essential reading on the Job Guarantee. The best way to support the unemployed in society. #MMT
The "Govt as Household" & "Taxpayer Money" analogies have sat at the apex of economic narrative for 50 yrs. What can be done?
Dismantling this narrative requires a strategic, multidisciplinary counter-offensive that builds a more accurate & equally compelling story.
substack.com/@mmtmichael/...
Every generation inherits not just the physical infrastructure of its predecessors but a set of assumptions about what is economically possible. #MMT
This is an excellent read, well worth the time to digest... #MMT
TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF NEW YEAR ISSUANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TEMPORAL AUSTERITY MEASURES
#MMT_UK #MMT
✨ New Essay! ✨
@greenbackbetter.bsky.social argues that the current turn toward the analog isn't simple nostalgia. It's a rejection of design as inevitable. From frictionless UX to balanced budgets, it's time to stop treating the politics of design as natural constraints.
Please read & share! 👩💻 🙌
Get back to the ivory tower Jonathan. Sorry for disturbing you.
Delighted to hear that The Invisible Doctrine, the film by @peterhutchison.bsky.social and @lucas-sabean.bsky.social, is being offered free to view on YouTube for the holiday season. It's all yours! youtu.be/gR4eSEetKP0
This isn't about not doing "the hard work." It's about noticing that your rule treats deficit levels as something to target, which means treating them as constraints. That's the bit you haven't explained.
Calling something "silly and boring" isn't an argument. If you've "repeatedly" explained the household analogy is wrong, why support a fiscal rule that treats deficit levels as the constraint rather than real resources? That's the household analogy with extra steps.
Interesting.
@richardjmurphy.bsky.social disagrees:
"the issue here is not accounting. It is whether economists are willing to be honest about how the system works, and then argue openly about how it should be used. Portes does not seem to want to do so."
www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2025/12...
Government spending already creates money. Gilt sales drain reserves that spending put there. This isn't "print vs borrow" - it's whether to offer savers a term deposit afterwards. You called this "just accounting." Now it's "dangerous BS." Which is it, Jonathan?
"Standard economics" to "dangerous BS" in one thread. Pick one. And if the household fallacy is irrelevant, why has "how will we pay for it" dominated every fiscal debate while serious economists stayed silent?
"Just printed money" - government spending already creates money. Gilts drain reserves spending already injected. You're not choosing print vs borrow; you're choosing whether to offer term deposits after. This is the accounting you called uninteresting.
The Trussonomics smear is lazy and you know it. MMT economists opposed those tax cuts precisely because the framework says: look at real resource constraints and distributional effects, not deficit numbers. Kwarteng's budget failed on both counts. That's the MMT critique. Try engaging with it.
"Just accounting" as if accounting identities don't constrain economics.You're sharing a passage that says it wasn't solvency risk while claiming no serious economist ever said it was. The entire post minibudget discourse was bond vigilantes & fiscal punishment. Were you correcting that at the time?