a man wearing a shirt that says the clash is screaming ALT: a man wearing a shirt that says the clash is screaming

Typing systemctl reboot instead of clicking restart so my laptop knows I’m a certified hacker man

Boomer ass NIMBY center “democrat” who actively fights against local green energy and affordable housing within 15 minutes type energy.

This is my sports betting

99% certain this is either a bot account or someone posting from Russia/Korea/Iran. Terrible use of Rockwell’s freedoms of speech. 2/10.

WHATTA RIG HOLY SHIT

While I can agree they’re more folk-rock, the fact that you change the station upon hearing ANY Mumford and Sons song is wild.

I books has good taste in people because half the people she shits on are people I have blocked

Now THIS is sick af

Overall Grade: Mostly Correct Use

Here’s Why: While not inherently a controversial opinion to posit, it does invite debate, and talks about a relevant policy issue.

FoSUNRI Rating — 7.5

This user has been flagged by the Freedom of Speech Use National Rating Institute as a serial poster of this painting in incorrect contexts and thus will be banned in accordance with the Rockwellian Damocles Überhammer.

Overall Grade: Incorrect use of FoS

Here’s why: It does not present a point of debate, nor does it posit a controversial ideal. It states what is effectively a proverb. 0/10 use a painting of king Solomon or someone next time.

Now, it does vary a touch from the source material’s idée de base, but is still close enough I’m willing to grade as semi-correct. 6/10, with a point for originality in making the coat Ferrari red.

Overall rating: Semi-correct use of Freedom of Speech

Here’s Why: It presents a semi-controversial opinion that’s open to debate. Additionally, in a non-standard twist that we at the FoS Use National Rating Institute haven’t yet creating a grading criteria for: editing the source painting. Cont⬇️

…a rushed experience where time is the number one priority. 3/10 address your argument’s inherent flaws first.

Overall rating: Semi-correct use

Here’s why:
Poster does in fact, posit a controversial opinion in a format that does invite debate. BUT the poster does nothing to address the inherent fact that a dining-in experience will always be a slower experience compared to drive through, which implies….

Welcome back to my now nightly Freedom of Speech use review, sponsored by Manscaped.

Overall, incorrect use. Has a touch of credit in that it has a little bit of a controversial opinion, but at its core is still complaining about winning, which feels against the spirit. 2/10 there are better images

This man smells of being a Ch*lsea fan

The Freedom of Speech commentary posts will continue until morale improves

Ironically, this post about the meme being played out, is also itself, played out. The results in this being an incorrect usage of Freedom of Speech due to the Mainstream Opinion fallacy. 1/10

Terrible opinion, correct usage. -1/10 no further notes due to the authors inability to speak without bias.

This I would argue, is spiritually the same as Freedom of Speech, but also implies that the poster believes an inherent degree of superiority of their opinion. 10/10 would love to see this used more.

Overall, while not a NIMBY statement, or self-congratulatory performative center-leftism, is not true to the spirit that Rockwell portrays in this painting. 3/10 would recommend using pictures of signage currently in library or of better library signage.

Where it breaks is that it doesn’t say anything controversial, or potentially incorrect.

It doesn’t even include an opening for debate or discussion on the topic. It’s a plain and pure statement.

Freedom of Speech, inherent to its core arguments it makes as a piece of art, invites discussion…

This is what I what categorize as an incorrect use of Freedom of Speech, here’s why:

It is, granted, semi-faithful to the source material of the event that sparked the painting — a man talking about a public issue in an open forum.
(no this isn’t AI, I just actually use em-dashes)

Cont. Below

Another example of proper use of this painting. Outside of the original context, but it stands on the merit of its own humor, and the core element of the common man speaking for himself, regardless of potential correctness. 7/10 would like again

Now THIS is an acceptable use of this painting. It gives a bold, potentially incorrect but open to argument and discussion point that is outside a mainstream point of reasoning. It is also mildly humorous. 8/10 would like again.

Anyone who unironically posts the Freedom of Speech painting while stating a reasonable opinion as something bold will now be turbo-insta-blocked. It’s all a bunch of center-left NIMBYs self-congratulating themselves on being leftists.

The effort would be better spent on autofellatio.

NIMBY ass posting, real bold opinion with Norman Rockwell’s most misused painting of all time.

99% sure this is a dead internet bot.

Congrats on saying this about the only Billionaire who actually pays his full taxes.

Need @tacobell.bsky.social to come out with a rewards tier higher than Fire. My 6000+ lifetime rewards points need something to strive for.