'Last year Richard Tice said Angela Rayner should resign if she had any moral decency after she'd underpaid stamp duty, should he also resign then by his own standards?'
Answer, dear reader, was there none.
New Hungarian PM brutally confronts a news channel that banned him for years.
For all the terrible things Mandleson did, the worst was being left of the Telegraph
1st May 2026
That's the date the US is projected to have 1,000 billionaires
No universal healthcare, massive gaps in rail infrastructure, and undrinkable water in many states.
Billionaires though. The American dream!
I don't think different rules do apply to Trump
I think the lesson we've learnt is the rules never existed
You can't observe Hormuz Strait without affecting it!
Not only the just thing to do, but right for the people, and makes the process of eventually moving water into pubic ownership cheaper - by making it unpalatable for grifters
Bandwidth of people should be the measure; you're 💯 correct
The decisions should move away from Westminster. The government is afraid of anyone else making a decision, but the correct way to run any department is to fund it, measure it, and steer it
The exchequer should not make these decisions
Did they put more busses on when they made the carpark free?
This village uses its solar income on free communal lunches, buses and other communal efforts.“If you divide money as individual income, people feel disconnected. People who didn’t know each other for years now get to know each other within days”
I love everything about this.
Russians are mapping for gaps in our defenses because they know the only repercussion is they'll be turned away
ukdefencejournal.org.uk/typhoon-jets...
I don't like escalation, but the costs need to be higher; and Russia can't afford another front
I think some of those might be woolie goats 🐐
Panels on stilts
A wonderful piece of research for Britishers with flat roofs
www.pv-magazine.com/2026/04/15/v...
Or flat (ish) land and sheep perhaps?
It's a shame there are so many cases of these free carparks filling and forcing people to pay elsewhere and walk further
I'm not defending charging for spaces, but it's clearly not a solved problem
You're missing the point
Nobody should need a car for personal use
Private companies should never be able to control access to infrastructure
If you created something that became a market or a valuable piece of infrastructure, we'll done. You won at life. It's for the people now.
That includes software - operating systems and search engines should be public
🤳 Starmer: "It's clear to me that parents aren't asking us for tweaks at the edges, they're asking us whether a system that clearly isn't working for children should be allowed to continue at all."
There are plenty more pressing issues with the BBC she could he dealing with
Absolutely pile of useless
I'm not sure this cunning slight of hand is going to turn out to be the misdirection Lib Dems hope it is
We all know who's winning "here", and it's none of these three!
Dear media, please stop calling it "the conflict in the Middle East" and start calling it "Trump's war."
"We are likely to face fuel, fertiliser and food shortages because of Trump's war"
Now doesn't that sound more accurate?
"Man who doesn't pay fair share of tax threatens to not pay tax if he has to pay tax"
Weird how the wealthy always act like they're going to leave if the party gets expensive. It's not about what they need. It's about using wealth as a scorecard.
Get him a therapist then bill him
I still lament the loss of northern high speed rail, but branch and light rail is far, far more important
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Well, this is good news...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
...but it's a shame it's coming from the same company who recently decided to redirect a fraction of all page visits to Gemini!
All scumbagery begins with hypocrisy
Diplomacy isn't a reward
It's the difference between how we treated Germany after each of the world wars
...I just realised Pippa is a Guardian Editor!
Wow. What a scumbag move.
Most people will be, and that's the fault of The Guardian in this case (not Fiona Hill, who was hired by the government to make sure we're preparing correctly for war)
This review was funded by our government, which is currently ramping up military spending, in order to make sure we're prepared for war
Incredibly dishonest article from the Guardian. Essentially the opposite of the truth.
