'Transparent' East Pye has faced strong opposition from politicians in the other main parties on the council including the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and Reform UK.
Don't you feel guilty for being so dishonest?
'Transparent' East Pye has faced strong opposition from politicians in the other main parties on the council including the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and Reform UK.
Don't you feel guilty for being so dishonest?
Another thought is that if you post certain things, it will become obvious to everyone what a piece of shit you are.
Thank you, I think I understand things better now.
Ah yes, the old "I know you are but what am I".
God, this is so unbelievably pathetic.
You do realize that this is a very obvious dodge, right?
"You're worth very little attention and that's why I said something incredibly stupid"
Okay.
If it's so clear, I'm sure you'll have no trouble offering a summary though.
Lmao, you literally just said "Maybe try grappling with the argument"
Or is "the US is bad" supposed to be the argument?
If so, I still think you need to actually connect it to 9/11 somehow unless the idea is that any action that hurts US citizens is okay because the US is bad.
I'm grappling with my best guess as to what the argument is supposed to be because as far as I can tell, there's no actual argument presented.
There's a whole lot of criticism of the US (some that's somewhat related to 9/11 and a lot that's not) but no actual argument.
"9/11 is justified in order to stop the US bombing the Middle East" doesn't seem to work very well as an argument given that it resulted in even more bombing of the Middle East.
This is what Ralph Nader said about electing Bush in 2000.
But I guess we just need more pain. More and more pain until eventually it's definitely going to work.
a photo of a woman who is definitely not smirking
Do you know what the word "smirk" means?
It does not mean "totally neutral expression, consistent with being unconscious".
The idea that dialogue with propagandists improves anything is very obviously stupid.
I mean, you've claimed that it does something but only provided something which does nothing but flatter you.
Obviously if you want anyone to take seriously your claim that it does the thing you're claiming it does, you'll need to provide some kind of evidence.
I love standing in front of a blackboard full of equations while I say the absolute dumbest shit imaginable.
Why do you object to that so strongly?
bsky.app/profile/hamp...
What an *insanely* narcissistic response.
If you describe genocide as a microscopic flaw, you might want to just cut to the chase and say that you don't think Palestinians are human beings.
All this idiocy accomplishes nothing besides further debasing yourself.
You literally just claimed there was a "right of self determination ... inherent in every nation state in the world - whether that determination is the worst of humanity or the best of humanity."
Just stop talking.
So Hitler's only mistake was invading other countries?
The Holocaust would have been just fine as long as it stayed inside Germany's borders?
Lmao, this is fucking pathetic.
You would have more dignity if you simply admitted that you support ethnic cleansing rather than engaging in this kind of transparent bullshit.
Are you embarrassed to be like this?
Seems like this should be a very easy question for @shishiqiushi.bsky.social to answer so I look forward to their response.
Let me guess: you still think people get their information from the big news orgs?
No, it's all about niche comedy Twitter accounts now. If Sridhar and his ilk had just kept quiet, no one would have had any idea what was going on in Gaza and Harris definitely would have won Dearborn.
I mean, the actual qualification is that he's a psychopath though.