Fake news
Correction 4/14/2026, 5:40 a.m. ET: A previous version of this article erroneously attributed quotes to China's Defense Minister Dong Jun. Newsweek regrets the error.
www.newsweek.com/china-warns-...
Yep, Newsweek have now issued a correction
Correction 4/14/2026, 5:40 a.m. ET: A previous version of this article erroneously attributed quotes to China's Defense Minister Dong Jun. Newsweek regrets the error.
www.newsweek.com/china-warns-...
Fake news
Correction 4/14/2026, 5:40 a.m. ET: A previous version of this article erroneously attributed quotes to China's Defense Minister Dong Jun. Newsweek regrets the error.
www.newsweek.com/china-warns-...
Fake news
Correction 4/14/2026, 5:40 a.m. ET: A previous version of this article erroneously attributed quotes to China's Defense Minister Dong Jun. Newsweek regrets the error.
www.newsweek.com/china-warns-...
Fake news
Correction 4/14/2026, 5:40 a.m. ET: A previous version of this article erroneously attributed quotes to China's Defense Minister Dong Jun. Newsweek regrets the error.
www.newsweek.com/china-warns-...
Thx, hadn’t seen it’d been expanded. But they will arguing it’s not ‘offensive’ strikes and in collective self-defense.
What bases are you referring to? Think the only one they’re allowed to use for defensive purposes near Iran is the Diego Garcia one as its joint run by us/uk and was attacked.
He knows it’d be a disaster worse than whatever Trump can threaten.
There’s a link at the bottom of each page with the json too for easy exporting and reuse!
I hear Rwanda is nice this time of year
She knows the propaganda machine works in her favour and is her best shot of regaining power.
A hand-drawn sketch has the same 'result' but is legal; the law targets the tool, not the harm. Stop handing the State the power to police private data. What’s next, those with hyperphantasia are committing thought crimes?
If "harm" is defined by whatever "many disagree with," then civil liberties are dead. Many people "disagree" with the tactics of PA, but that doesn't mean supporting them should be a criminal offence. Legality must be based on objective victimisation (distribution/harassment), not social distaste.
If govt is the guide for rationality, their crackdown on Palestine Action must be correct too? Consistency matters. Volume/realism is just efficiency; a faster pencil shouldn't be a crime. UK law should target public harassment (the harm), not private creation (the tool).
Equating private creations to a 'sexual offender' is a massive reach, fash Steve. If drawing at home isn’t a crime, why is using a digital tool? UK law should target the distribution and harassment where harm occurs, not the private medium itself.
Did you not read what I wrote? The issue is people are doing it publicly in response to pictures posted. It’s harassment/humiliation. Doing it privately is no worse than drawing or using photoshop.
All the AIs can do that. They all suddenly got more lax when Trump got into power.
The issue in play is that people are replying to photos uploaded to Twitter, and publicly doing it in response to their tweets.
Just wow. @pluralistic.net.web.brid.gy came out swinging in this article. He's right though and that's the coolest part.
Banxa fiat ramps are live for ERG 🎉.
US users can now buy and sell ERG directly through
Read more 👉 bit.ly/3LpRM4v
Discord has refuted these statements already btw.
It’s just a proposal at this stage. Needs to voted on by all member states.
