Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Jakob Schneebacher

UCL – University College London UCL is consistently ranked as one of the top ten universities in the world (QS World University Rankings 2010-2022) and is No.2 in the UK for research power (Research Excellence Framework 2021).

A postdoc position is now available in my project Markets and Mobility: How Employers Structure Economic Opportunity. Start date flexible within the next 12 months, apply by 9 May.

www.ucl.ac.uk/work-at-ucl/...

2 weeks ago 29 35 0 0

My @theifs.bsky.social colleague @gautamvyas.bsky.social is now on Bluesky!

Check out his new report, joint with Martin Brogaard, on the Soft Drinks Industry Levy reform, and follow him for more research on nutrition policy.

4 weeks ago 1 3 0 0

My @theifs.bsky.social colleague @gautamvyas.bsky.social is now on Bluesky!

Check out his new report, joint with Martin Brogaard, on the Soft Drinks Industry Levy reform, and follow him for more research on nutrition policy.

4 weeks ago 1 3 0 0

ESCoE work by @trfetzer.com, @christinavpalmou.bsky.social and @jschneebacher.bsky.social outlines a blueprint to help policymakers respond to economic shocks: tinyurl.com/mv4p8rec

4 weeks ago 2 1 0 0
Post image

A study on the identification and estimation of dynamic matching models of the labor market shows that usual measures of sorting and monopsony power are biased, from Cristina Gualdani, Elena Pastorino, Áureo de Paula, and Sergio Salgado www.nber.org/papers/w34973

4 weeks ago 4 2 0 0
Preview
Mergers, Foreign Competition, and Jobs: Evidence from the U.S. Appliance Industry (Forthcoming Article) - Policy choices often create trade-offs between workers and consumers. I examine how foreign competition alters the consumer welfare and domestic employment effects of mergers. I construct a model incorporating consumer demand, endogenous product portfolios, and employment decisions. Applying the model to Whirlpool’s acquisition of Maytag in the appliance industry, I compare the observed merger to a counterfactual acquisition by a foreign buyer. Although Whirlpool’s acquisition decreased consumer welfare by $271 million annually, it preserved 797 domestic jobs. These jobs must therefore be valued at more than $345,000 per year for the domestic employment benefits to offset the consumer harm.

Forthcoming in the AER: "Mergers, Foreign Competition, and Jobs: Evidence from the U.S. Appliance Industry" by Felix Montag.

1 month ago 4 2 0 0

🚨Replication alert🚨
I'm pleased to announce that my replication of Moretti (2021) is now accepted as a comment at AER.

I find ten issues in the paper. My comment focuses on two major problems; in the appendix, I document eight (relatively) minor problems.

1/

1 month ago 148 50 9 11
Preview
Competition in Health Insurance Markets Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an...

New paper out with Amanda Starc on competition in health insurance markets, in particular on the complicated ways in which asymmetric information and competition interact (spoiler: things aren’t going so well). www.nber.org/papers/w34928

1 month ago 21 6 2 0
Screenshot of quoted post from @fetzert

Screenshot of quoted post from @fetzert

This paper has, for obvious reasons, become quite relevant again...

Context: https://x.com/fetzert/status/1838600691520037294

1 month ago 3 1 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

Intrinsically, I think

a) thinking up good questions and
b) executing on them with good approaches is HARD.

I have not seen evidence that LLMs do this without prompting and guidance from a human agent.

But I have friends who disagree!

2 months ago 47 5 3 0

This looks like a great tool for PAPs.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Next Thursday at 3pm we launch @benzaranko.bsky.social's major new report on the UK fiscal framework at our in-person and online event, with a panel including @chrisgiles.ft.com, Victoria Clarke and Rupert Harrison chaired by Gus O'Donnell.

➡️ Sign up to join here: ifs.org.uk/events/does-...

2 months ago 2 1 0 1
Preview
Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 40 No. 1 Winter 2026

New JEP is out, with an excellent symposium on competition in labour markets:

www.aeaweb.org/issues/836?t...

2 months ago 2 2 0 0
Preview
Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 40 No. 1 Winter 2026

New JEP is out, with an excellent symposium on competition in labour markets:

www.aeaweb.org/issues/836?t...

2 months ago 2 2 0 0

Nine days left to submit a paper to the first CEP-@theifs.bsky.social Labour Economics Conference!

#EconConf

2 months ago 2 1 0 0

📢 Call for papers: 1st Annual CEP–IFS Labour Conference
London | 15–16 June 2026

We invite labour economics papers on wages & inequality, firm wage-setting, monopsony, unions, worker mobility & place-based policies.
Submit by 13 Feb 2026.
🔗 Details & submissions: ow.ly/yvGJ50XY3fK

2 months ago 18 12 1 2
Advertisement
Post image

Planning your summer conference schedule? I've updated my conference list for 2026, with deadlines, dates, locations, and links. You can also download calendar entries. Focus is on general conferences, IO, and theory. Let me know if I've missed something. Link: www.igorletina.com/conferences....

2 months ago 5 4 0 0
“Potential” and the Gender Promotion Gap†
By Alan Benson, Danielle Li, and Kelly Shue*
We show that subjective assessments of employee “potential” contribute to gender gaps in promotion and pay. Using data on 29,809
management-track employees from a large retail chain, we find that
women receive substantially lower potential ratings despite receiving
higher performance ratings. Differences in potential ratings account
for approximately half of the gender promotion gap. Women’s lower
potential ratings do not reflect accurate forecasts of future performance: Women subsequently outperform male colleagues, both on
average and on the margin of promotion. We highlight two mechanisms driving the gender potential gap: strategic retention and stereotyping. (JEL J16, J31, J71, L81, M12, M51)

“Potential” and the Gender Promotion Gap† By Alan Benson, Danielle Li, and Kelly Shue* We show that subjective assessments of employee “potential” contribute to gender gaps in promotion and pay. Using data on 29,809 management-track employees from a large retail chain, we find that women receive substantially lower potential ratings despite receiving higher performance ratings. Differences in potential ratings account for approximately half of the gender promotion gap. Women’s lower potential ratings do not reflect accurate forecasts of future performance: Women subsequently outperform male colleagues, both on average and on the margin of promotion. We highlight two mechanisms driving the gender potential gap: strategic retention and stereotyping. (JEL J16, J31, J71, L81, M12, M51)

"...women receive substantially lower potential ratings despite receiving higher performance ratings... lower potential ratings do not reflect accurate forecasts of future performance: Women subsequently outperform male colleagues..."
pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/...

2 months ago 133 46 1 4

Are you an outstanding communicator who knows loads about the UK public finances? Are you attracted by the prospect of a public voice, and the chance to work alongside brilliant economists at the country's finest think tank?

We'd like to hear from you: app.beapplied.com/apply/4t6eys...

2 months ago 0 4 0 0

I made an IO starter pack a while ago that you might find helpful:

go.bsky.app/Rchu8QX

3 months ago 3 0 0 0

🚨Rare and exciting opportunity 🚨

We're looking to hire an exceptional economist to work on fiscal policy at the IFS. We don't do this often. It's a chance to shape, carry out and communicate research on some of the highest-profile topics in UK economic policy. [1/4]

3 months ago 11 18 2 4
Markets and Mobility: How Employers Structure Economic Opportunity

Markets and Mobility: How Employers Structure Economic Opportunity

Intergenerational mobility, measuring the ability to achieve economic success regardless of family background, is a critical reflection of a society’s commitment to equality of opportunity. Rising income inequality has raised concerns about the potential erosion of upward mobility. While education has traditionally been viewed as the path to mobility, its transformative power is facing challenges in a rapidly evolving job market. This project reorients the focus of intergenerational mobility research by highlighting the labor market as an arena for the reproduction of advantage. It employs a comparative approach, using administrative data from four countries: Sweden, Austria, England, and the United States. It also incorporates evidence from a broader set of nations through cross-national surveys, longitudinal household surveys, labor force surveys, secondary data, and digital trace data. The project employs cutting-edge empirical methods, including quasi- experimental designs, event studies, within-family comparisons, decomposition analyses, counterfactual simulations, and diagnostic checks to rigorously assess the extent of inequalities in the labor market. The research investigates how family background influences the sorting of individuals to employers and workplaces, accounting for education and occupation, and explores variations in career progression within and between employers. It comprehensively catalogues and assesses mechanisms shaping workplace inequality, contributing to the development of social closure theory. Additionally, the project evaluates intervention strategies, encompassing both employer practices and government actions, to promote fair opportunity in the labor market.

Intergenerational mobility, measuring the ability to achieve economic success regardless of family background, is a critical reflection of a society’s commitment to equality of opportunity. Rising income inequality has raised concerns about the potential erosion of upward mobility. While education has traditionally been viewed as the path to mobility, its transformative power is facing challenges in a rapidly evolving job market. This project reorients the focus of intergenerational mobility research by highlighting the labor market as an arena for the reproduction of advantage. It employs a comparative approach, using administrative data from four countries: Sweden, Austria, England, and the United States. It also incorporates evidence from a broader set of nations through cross-national surveys, longitudinal household surveys, labor force surveys, secondary data, and digital trace data. The project employs cutting-edge empirical methods, including quasi- experimental designs, event studies, within-family comparisons, decomposition analyses, counterfactual simulations, and diagnostic checks to rigorously assess the extent of inequalities in the labor market. The research investigates how family background influences the sorting of individuals to employers and workplaces, accounting for education and occupation, and explores variations in career progression within and between employers. It comprehensively catalogues and assesses mechanisms shaping workplace inequality, contributing to the development of social closure theory. Additionally, the project evaluates intervention strategies, encompassing both employer practices and government actions, to promote fair opportunity in the labor market.

JOB! I'm hiring a postdoc for 2 years on my ERC MaMo project.

Looking for someone with strong quant methods, ongoing work close to the project's aims, and a desire to publish in sociology. Start flexible in the next 12 months.

Formal call out shortly, but contact me first.

3 months ago 101 108 0 6

Best workshop, best keynote and best time to visit London! Submit your paper/abstract. Deadline Feb 1.

3 months ago 11 4 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Refining our competition regime We are seeking views on measures to improve the pace, predictability, proportionality and process of the UK’s competition regime.

A consultation on UK govt proposals for "refining" the competition regime. The proposals would chip away at CMA independence, which - as John Fingleton has said on Linked In - businesses might like short term but creates longer term risks. Closing date to respond 31 March www.gov.uk/government/c...

3 months ago 20 12 0 2

Peter put together a starter pack of my colleagues at the IFS.

Follow them for high-quality, policy-relevant analysis on tax and spending, efficiency and equity, firms and workers, healthcare and education and much more.

3 months ago 7 6 0 0

Peter put together a starter pack of my colleagues at the IFS.

Follow them for high-quality, policy-relevant analysis on tax and spending, efficiency and equity, firms and workers, healthcare and education and much more.

3 months ago 7 6 0 0
Post image

There’s a paradox around remote work. Jamie Dimon says it will kill productivity, while startups are hiring for remote roles. Who is right?

With Abhinav Gupta and Elena Simintzi we try to resolve this dispute

Paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Substack: arpitrage.substack.com/p/remote-wor...

3 months ago 79 30 4 8
Preview
Jakob Schneebacher joins ESCoE’s Leadership Executive - ESCoE Jakob Schneebacher has joined ESCoE’s Leadership Executive, with a focus on developing UK micro-data.

@jschneebacher.bsky.social has joined ESCoE’s Leadership Executive, with a focus on developing UK microdata.

Find out more: tinyurl.com/yhye8vk9

3 months ago 7 1 0 0

Last few days to apply to the annual @escoeorg.bsky.social conference on economic measurement taking place in London in May!

I am once again the topic lead for productivity, so please send all your papers on productivity (including public-sector), business dynamism and firm dynamics.

3 months ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

Studying automation when tasks are quality complements rather than separable, from @joshgans.bsky.social and Avi Goldfarb www.nber.org/papers/w34639

3 months ago 10 3 0 0