„Donald J. #Trump targets #PopeLeo XIV—and in doing so, reveals a deeper unease. When political power turns against a moral voice, it is often because it cannot contain it. Trump does not argue with Leo; he implores him to return to a language he can control. But the Pope speaks another language, one that cannot be reduced to the grammar of force, security, or national interest. In this sense, the attack is a declaration of impotence. Unable to absorb that voice, power tries to delegitimize it. Yet in doing so, it implicitly acknowledges its weight. If Leo were irrelevant, he would not deserve a word. Instead, he is invoked, named, opposed—a sign that his words matter. This is where the Church’s moral force emerges. Not as a counter-power, but as a space in which power is judged by a standard it does not control. Leo does not respond on the terrain of polemics, and for that very reason remains beyond its grasp. He is free. And that freedom—unarmed and disarming—is perhaps what most unsettles. And, at the same time, what matters most.“
Antonio Spadaro, ehemaliger Chefredakteur der Jesuitenzeitschrift „La Civiltà Cattolica“, ordnet Donald Trumps Attacke auf den Papst überzeugend ein: „In diesem Sinne ist der Angriff ein Bekenntnis zur Ohnmacht. Da sie diese Stimme nicht absorbieren kann, versucht die Macht, sie zu delegitimieren.“
