At Google, some mental health providers felt pressured to not have clients due to the power imbalance:
'“She was concerned that affiliating with me would compromise her contract with Google,” Ms. Glasson said.'
Gift article:
Posts by Łori J. Williams🧋
I don't even know what the deleted thread was about (actually, now that I think back, I remember something likely and it was about Target making false accusations of shoplifting), but if one can, definitely don't shop there.
I hope the deleted thread means they're suing Target.
"Two studies put ChatGPT, Gemini and others to the test on questions of health. In one, they got almost half the answers wrong"
You can put in rails for how many 'r's are in strawberry once you've been the error exists.
Medical (or other) professionals don't have time to check your LLM.
He's going to use racism to defend AI? He actually went there? 🤦🏻♀️
If it wasn't obvious before, I'd say that this makes it obvious he's using LLMs. Because wtf?
I'm not sure this dude has even talked to a "yard sign" person. 🤦🏻♀️
Responding would be a waste of time. The dude is daft and intentionally being so to strawman.
Their take is... Not even factually based on research done on chat bots. They become more extremist even when opposing posts are weighted higher. I've seen Grok double down on a widely published photo not existing.
LLMs enhance bias, not reverse it 🤦🏻♀️
TIL today: color catchers 😯
Any particular brand you recommend?
I'm going to mention who I'd likely back for Swalwell's seat: Wahab. It's no surprise she's in the lead. She's well known in our area and very engaged. She recently had a Medi-Cal and CalFresh webinar. The others are not recognizable to me not being in Dublin nor San Leandro.
You seem to have missed my point. As you said, "You should read my post again."
Btw, I can get ChatGPT to reliably tell me the date and have been for sometime. If a model is truly built years before, this should not be possible, nor should it lie to me and tell me, "You told me," when that's false.
Google's AI generated clickbait title: "Slate A New Kind of Scandal Is Growing Online. It's Ruining Careers-and Aimed at the Wrong Target. 3 days ago"
The actual text: "← [Website header]A.I. writing detectors: A new ki... slate.com Menu SLATE. Join Plus WRITERLY INDEPENDENCE USERS [Title] The A.I. Writing Panic Is Completely Missing the Point [Subheader] There's actually a much bigger problem-and it isn't chatbots generating books and articles. BY TIM REQUARTH APRIL 17, 2026 5:45 AM
Google, you've got to stop rewriting other people's stories, and worse yet, writing them as clickbait:
slate.com/technology/2...
California is protected by not cooperating with ICE. We will always be a target for the mere crime of being a blue state and progressive in some ways (e.g. emissions; definitely not claiming that everything is progressive) the rest of the nation isn't that Republicans hate.
There is no need for ICE to exist and several for it to be abolished and to loudly call for being abolished. Anything less indicates high potential for continued harm.
This is my post and I'll continue to mention how some candidates are inadequate on ICE.
Inadequate means potential for:
-future "cooperation"
-continued in-facility murders
-inadequate conditions
-punitive "temporary detentions"
ICE was created in 2003 due to fear of non-white people.
Y'all couldn't write "Connie Ballmer"???????
He could still want to abolish it due to recognizing its criminal and murderous behavior. Nothing in the interview pointed to that.
We need people in political positions that will *keep* people safe and alive. While he can't abolish it, he shows reaction, not prevention.
He thinks ICE is either not criminal or redeemable. Both are false. Prosecutions don't undo murders both inside and outside of detention facilities.
It was highly used mid 2024 and trended again (though not as highly around the start of 2025. LLMs have documented (intended) recency bias thus weighing more heavily than older data in the set. Perhaps you could elaborate on why you think it was fast given that known intended data ingestion bias?
I did. You use the word "interesting". But this behavior has been known for a while, specifically with Microsoft's Tay that quickly became racist and sexist within 16 hours. So why was this interesting to you?
Caitlyn=unlikely to be LGBTQ
ICE=unlikely to be an immigrant or racial minority
Alt text=unaware of disabilities
And never addressed unequal incarceration sentences.
That's sus to me, someone who is fluid, multiracial, and has disabilities. They wanted equality for themselves only, not "everyone".
Image text: 'EmilyInParis @cshlgvdajce830.bsky.soci... 1h Replied to teddyfan.bsky.social Joined Oct '23 Lol, I'm literally part of *multiple* "marginalized groups" and frankly I don't need people to care for me. I only need fairness, equality, and the rights stuff in the Constitution.' Narrator: they did not, in fact, understand that equality is caring about others unless they mean only for themselves, despite them later saying for "everyone".
Text: 'EmilylnParis @cshlgvdajce830.bsky.social Joined Oct '23 Follow My rights come from the virtue of me being a human being and a citizen of this country. My rights do not come from or depend upon anyone caring for me. I don't need people or the government to "care for" me or for my rights. I need them to respect and refrain from infringing on my rights. 9:03 PM Apr 18, 2026 @ringtheory.bsky.s... now Łori J. Williams Joined May '23 They/She Bluesky Elder Have you not read up about ICE detention facilities? The government certainly isn't caring about them and people are getting sick and dying from lack of care. But glad you're not part of a marginalized group that has been illegally targeted by ICE.'
Ahahahahaha 🤣
cshlgvdajce830.bsky.social 's sus claim of marginalized groups didn't know who Caitlyn was, why the government should care about ICE detainees, didn't use alt text on their gif, and blocked me because I kept pointing out how the majority of marginalized individuals *know* these things.
My hypothesis on why leadership isn't endorsing anyone: they're cowards.
They're worried about being connected to another scandal or that their endorsement won't win and signal voter repudiation of them to others.
Imagine the impact of Newsom's favorite not winning on his run for President.
Yep, you want equal rights for you and no one else. That's *actually* not caring about anyone.
Never asked you to care about anyone. Just showing you that you don't actually want equality (which is literally caring for others as others have already pointed out) for anyone but yourself.
Additionally, no alt text? Again, questionable behavior. 🤔
🤣 You sure you're a marginalized group or do you just play one on Bluesky? You're awfully uninformed and that's kinda a questionable thing.
"Ma'am"? (big assumption energy ⬆️)
Additionally, you're making assumptions that I think everyone is just like you.
Also you're being contradictory saying you want same rights but don't care about others. Unless you're actually saying *you* want equal rights but no one else should have them. 🤔
Have you not read up about ICE detention facilities? The government certainly isn't caring about them and people are getting sick and dying from lack of care.
But glad you're not part of a marginalized group that has been illegally targeted by ICE.
I'm literally part of multiple marginalized groups and so are my kids and siblings.
Equality is all about caring about *everyone*. E.g. how certain races get longer sentences than others for the exact same crimes. You don't sound like anyone who is marginalized who would already know this. 🤔