Thank you for sharing this
Posts by AlexVolloFPL
From today, you can create your own clean FPL team reveal in seconds, fully customisable and 100% free.
Built together with the amazing nextXI_fpl team… And we're just getting started.
👷🏻 Make yours and let us know what you think👇
nextxi.app/team-reveal
From today, you can create your own clean FPL team reveal in seconds, fully customisable and 100% free.
Built together with the amazing nextXI_fpl team… And we're just getting started.
👷🏻 Make yours and let us know what you think👇
nextxi.app/team-reveal
I recorded a 15-minute podcast about how DEFCONs changed FPL and the meta around it.
Watch here: youtu.be/0X1FvjNDV-Q
Increased? DEFCON defenders are way too meta to pick other options
Oh i’m perfectly fine with whatever faceless BlueSky account has to say about it. Unfortunately, there’s not much to engage with here, as once again nothing constructive about the post itself was actually mentioned.
Captains 🤔 Transfers 🎯 How To Maximise Luck In GW31 🎲🥳
Watch: youtu.be/aPJvfVNCWp4
We all think FPL is about being the best at picking players.
The elite managers know it is about minimising the damage when you get it wrong.
It's not too late to learn these lessons.
There’s not much to reply to when nothing constructive is being said about the post itself or the reasoning behind it.
Powered by @xgstat.bsky.social , the best platforms for analysts and advanced FPL users. Clean UI, strong data, and a lot you won't find elsewhere. Use code VOLLO50 on their website for 50% off your first month.
More advanced CB touches means more final-third entries and more chances for cutbacks, second balls, and edge-of-the-box shots. It's just a very good opponent for him, especially in terms of receiving early against a disorganised block. Set pieces are a nice bonus on top.
Harry Wilson benefits indirectly from all of this. If CBs can carry forward easily, Burnley's shape gets distorted, the midfield gets dragged, and space opens in the half-spaces.
Their press is passive, forwards don't screen properly, and midfielders don't step out to confront advancing CBs, which means time, space, and freedom to carry or pick passes. This is pretty much the ideal matchup for the profiles of Bassey and Andersen.
Burnley rank as the worst team in the league for conceding threat from CBs, so It's not just set pieces either. Burnley are also failing to engage CBs in build-up.
Andersen is also very aggressive attacking these situations, although based on recent routines his ceiling might be slightly lower, the matchup still suits him.
Fulham have also leaned heavily into asymmetric set-piece routines recently, overloading one zone so the weak-side CB gets separation. That's where Bassey often ends up as the free man.
In the last match against Burnley, he won the most duels and still found himself in completely unmarked situations, one of which he scored from.
Burnley defenders often fail to engage physically strong opponents in dead-ball situations. While aerial duels can be a weakness for Bassey, his physicality allows him to thrive against teams that don't aggressively contest second balls or initial headers.
CB attacking returns are obviously low-probability by default, but the opponent weakness, specifically Burnley's recent decline in defending set pieces makes Fulham CBs and Harry Wilson stand out as the best options.
no spoilers🤐
Tomorrow's Scout & Analyst picks should be really interesting, probably the most useful one as well with so many people going for short-term punts before wildcarding.
Stay tuned, and thank you for the feedback ;)
The way people here talk about Anthony Gordon as an FPL asset now vs the last five months, you'd think he's suddenly started to play with a gun in his hand.
OMG Eze that was beautiful, big fan of that Adidas celebration as well
I do feel the same way about bonus points because everything "big chances" related is subjective by its nature
All of that is a good argument against defcon
A lot of those "defensive" contributions are dangerous own half losses and even pre assists sometimes
Something can be predictable in aggregate over time, via data/models but still hard to identify event-by-event in real time, especially with something as subjective as DEFCONs.
The way DCs are actually given is inconsistent enough to feel random when you watch.
We have the lowest scoring league in five years, I'm not sure why we need defcons at this point tbh
Also I believe that less subjectivity = a fair, competitive game.
You can only predict something when the thing you're predicting is consistent, classifiable and measurable
Because you can't predict what you can't classify, very simple.
For me, someone who used to classify on-pitch actions for a living, it's still hard sometimes to tag defcons correctly.
Opta deadlines are just completely unfair as well.
I think the biggest problem is the nature of those points, it's the most unpredictable metric but at the same time those points are almost guaranteed, which is not ok
I don't even talk about classification of those "defensive" actions