Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by UNCG AAUP

Post image

🚨 @SpeakerDonScott @VAHouseDems
Well over half of VA profs are untenured and many struggle to pay the bills. This is 2x true for our adjunct profs. As Prof Letiecq says, our working conditions are our students' learning conditions! When we struggle, they struggle. We need collective bargaining NOW!

1 month ago 12 6 0 0

Let's be clear: While we are disappointed that this passed, the elimination of the most egregious language and restrictions is due to the tireless efforts of our AAUP NC members and allies. We are the fastest growing conference, and we're just getting started.

1 month ago 12 6 0 1

Also today at 5pm, UNCG Alumni House: Nancy MacLean of Duke University will speak: "Why is the Right 'Laying Siege' to Higher Education? The History that Solves the Mystery." Talk will be preceded by a reception beginning at 4pm hosted by the Association of Retired Faculty.

1 month ago 2 0 0 1

3pm TODAY: UNCG AAUP members and pals are meeting up at Tate Street Coffee House to chat about academic freedom. Stop by and say hi!

1 month ago 1 0 0 1
Preview
Protect Academic Freedom, Vote No to Revising The Code The UNC System Board of Governors will vote to amend the UNC System Code with new restrictions on academic freedom at its February 26 meeting. The Board of Governors plans to rewrite the very definiti...

Join @ncaaup.bsky.social in opposing major restrictions on academic freedom in the UNC System--sign the petition actionnetwork.org/petitions/pr...

2 months ago 13 12 1 0
Preview
UNC Plans to Define What Academic Freedom Is—and Isn’t The Faculty Assembly’s proposed definition will soon go before the state university system’s board, but with added language such as “academic freedom is not absolute.” The state AAUP is objecting.

UNC's redefinition of academic freedom as not absolute "does little to clarify key terms, leaving open the possibility for certain actors to retaliate against instructors with whom an institution, an administrator, or an outside party disagrees, thereby increasing the threat of self-censorship.”

2 months ago 13 3 2 0
Preview
Protect Academic Freedom, Our Faculty, Our Communities Faculty, staff, students, alumni, and community members: The UNC System is preparing to cave to political pressure from the Heritage Foundation, the Oversight Project, and the James Martin Center by ...

Should the University of North Carolina system obey right-wing think tanks like the Heritage Foundation & require faculty to make syllabi public? 🤔

Sign this petition & say NO! Academic integrity everywhere is at stake.

We're almost at 3,000 signatures—help us get there by signing & sharing.

3 months ago 10 4 1 0

Even at research intensive (R1) universities in the US, "tenure density" is already below 50%.

3 months ago 12 14 1 0
Advertisement

a little context: This was posted by the AAUP chapter at Texas A&M University; one of their members received the email, apparently.

3 months ago 21 8 4 1
Post image
3 months ago 2 2 1 0

We're disappointed our faculty senate leader, once outspoken in his defense of a liberal arts education, has now so thoroughly betrayed our lost faculty and students with, "it seems fine now." Students were hospitalized. Brilliant faculty left in droves. Those who remain are choosing to forget. SAD.

3 months ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Home 🚨 Recent events 🚨

For those who have forgotten the sweeping violations of shared governance, lack of transparency, and authoritarian nature of the APR here in 2024, we suggest a scroll through www.savetheg.com
This piece is embarrassing in its willful amnesia www.theassemblync.com/news/educati...

3 months ago 2 1 1 0
Preview
Protect Academic Freedom, Our Faculty, Our Communities Faculty, staff, students, alumni, and community members: The UNC System is preparing to cave to political pressure from the Heritage Foundation, the Oversight Project, and the James Martin Center by ...

Over 2,800 people have signed on to the AAUP petition challenging the requirement for faculty across universities in the North Carolina System to make syllabi publicly available.

The petition is still taking signatures: add yours today and say no to political pressure from right-wing think tanks 👇

3 months ago 18 12 1 0

This op-ed on the dangers of requiring public posting of course syllabi at the University of North Carolina System was authored by Annelise Mennicke and Caitlin Shroering of AAUP UNC - Charlotte.

@ncaaup.bsky.social
@uncgaaup.bsky.social
@unc-ch-aaup.bsky.social

4 months ago 3 1 0 0
Preview
Protect Academic Freedom, Our Faculty, Our Communities Faculty, staff, students, alumni, and community members: The UNC System is preparing to cave to political pressure from the Heritage Foundation, the Oversight Project, and the James Martin Center by ...

Protect the academic freedom of faculty at the UNC system, and challenge the unreasonable demand of admin to require instructors to publicly post their syllabi, by signing on to the petition below👇

@unc-ch-aaup.bsky.social

@uncgaaup.bsky.social

@ncaaup.bsky.social

3 months ago 8 5 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
UNC System may require all instructors to publish syllabi, course materials next academic year The drafted regulation, obtained by The Daily Tar Heel, states the policy would go into effect come the 2026-27 academic year. Some instructors said publishing syllabi would invite outside scrutiny th...

The University of North Carolina System may require all instructors to publish syllabi starting next year.

“Calling instructors 'work for hire' & stripping them of copyright is a surefire way to turn creative thinkers into widgets."

- Abigail Hatcher, AAUP UNC-Chapel Hill

4 months ago 37 30 2 5
Preview
Protect Academic Freedom, Our Faculty, Our Communities Faculty, staff, students, alumni, and community members: The UNC System is preparing to cave to political pressure from the Heritage Foundation, the Oversight Project, and the James Martin Center by ...

Sign the petition linked below to support higher ed workers at the UNC System in their fight against the requirement to create a searchable repository of all university syllabi, which will endanger students and instructors by inviting political actors to attack free inquiry across UNC campuses.

4 months ago 17 19 1 2
Video

The Trump admin weaponized Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to attack DEI programs, protections for trans people & freedom of speech at our universities.

We took the Trump admin to court over this in AAUP v. Trump and WON.

AAUP General Counsel Veena Dubal discusses what prompted the lawsuit👇

5 months ago 18 8 1 1

WE WON. I am *begging* you to take note of who did this. *Not* UCLA admin—they’re still scuttling around behind closed doors, attempting to appease—but FACULTY AND STAFF, led by AAUP.

5 months ago 3914 1077 22 21
Quote from an Inside Higher Ed article: Blaine added that he'd like "more information about who we are giving tenure to, how much demand there is for their classes, publications, and the majors they teach in, etc." He also said that "regardless of my philosophical opposition to the outdated tenure model, I think we should proceed very cautiously and with full information before adding that kind of long-term, fixed cost."

Quote from an Inside Higher Ed article: Blaine added that he'd like "more information about who we are giving tenure to, how much demand there is for their classes, publications, and the majors they teach in, etc." He also said that "regardless of my philosophical opposition to the outdated tenure model, I think we should proceed very cautiously and with full information before adding that kind of long-term, fixed cost."

The information this trustee claims should be evaluated are indeed included in tenure packages, developed in phases over the probationary tenure track period as faculty prepare annual evaluations and a 3 year reappointment review.

10 months ago 1 1 0 1

The tenure track probationary period is usually ~6 years, and before then, consider 5-8 years of graduate school plus 4 years of undergraduate work. By the time a tenure dossier hits the desk of trustees, most faculty have been through a host of rigorous evaluations spanning at least 20 years.

10 months ago 1 1 1 0
A pair of bar charts. The first chart shows what percentage of the analyzed cohort transition from a postdoc into a tenure-track job vs the fraction that move from a postdoc to another intermediate position. The second chart shows it takes an average of 5 years for the first group, and almost 7 years for the second group.

A pair of bar charts. The first chart shows what percentage of the analyzed cohort transition from a postdoc into a tenure-track job vs the fraction that move from a postdoc to another intermediate position. The second chart shows it takes an average of 5 years for the first group, and almost 7 years for the second group.

To give some further context to the idea of faculty not being fully vetted: Hsu et al. 2021 report 5-7 years between completing graduate school and earning a tenure-track position. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

10 months ago 2 1 1 0
Advertisement

The child in this trustee’s scenario? Faculty. Who submitted their tenure files for consideration in accordance with the terms of their employment. Both sides have a responsibility in that contract, one to submit and one to review.

I hope everyone really hears this.

10 months ago 1420 365 11 17

UNC's board has belatedly confirmed faculty's tenure awards, but made some incredibly alarming remarks along the way. On public outcry to the board's silence, one trustee wrote, "It is not good governance to give your child a cookie every time they lay on the floor and scream that they want one."

10 months ago 257 64 24 25
Post image

www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty...

10 months ago 155 22 4 18

anyone have ideas/resources for how AAUP chapters can show up in solidarity w/our staff/contract faculty colleagues? funding cuts are hitting hard, we needed to have set mutual aid networks up last year, the year before, etc.. 😬 also worried for our grad students and postdocs relying on grants

11 months ago 3 2 1 0
EO on Accreditation Opens the Door for Rampant Corruption and Political Interference President Donald Trump’s executive order on accreditation is yet another attempt to dictate what is taught, learned, said and done by college students and instructors. Threats to remove accreditors fr...

Trump’s executive order on accreditation is yet another attempt to dictate what is taught, learned, & said by college instructors & students.

Threats to remove accreditors are transparent attempts to consolidate power in the hands of the administration in order to stifle teaching & research.

🧵

11 months ago 117 76 1 2
Post image

Across the country on Feb 19, workers impacted by cuts to federal funding are coming together to say: Hands off our healthcare, research, and jobs! Join us in one of more than a dozen cities (& if there's not an action near you yet, sign up to be the first to know when there is): labor4highered.org

1 year ago 55 35 3 12