But Caracalla bathed.

Admittedly, Dems fighting back took the Pubes completely and understandably by surprise.

Seems like they didn't reckon on folks eating whole bags at one go.

These traitors must swing.

RICO. Seize all assets of all companies involved.

Final votes confirm Yes.

That's three. Troll blocked.

Putin is eager to ensure that no country ever trusts the US, with anything, ever again.

His pet Rapist obeys.

Then the FBI gets prosecuted as accessories after the fact.

#FilthCircuit

That's two. Answer the question.

It's the filth circuit. This is par for the course for them.

Delighted to see "yes" win. I've just been burned too many times by early positive results.

Sure did. I'm seeing a 10k vote lead for yes out of two and a quarter million votes counted and 130/133 locations reporting.

It's razor thin.

The Army of Darkness quote begins, "It's a trick."

It shouldn't be difficult to find out from his prison whether he's mailed anything in the past week.

Next, he went on to explain why so many Americans consider the sky to be generally blue.

Spoiler: The Germs win.

I call dibs on Things Not Working Right (Even After You've Thumped Them).

"God could have moved those bullets, but he couldn't be bothered."

Among many reasons I joined the #BrotherhoodOfFrozenPeas.

literally who

@hcrichardson.bsky.social Happy Tuesday Dorchester

Finally, I’ll mention a mindset in vogue among a certain crop of media executives. Although they claim to want politics out of the newsroom — and I do, too —they simultaneously propose a political calculus for their journalists. The new owner of CBS and the current editor-in-chief of the news division, for instance, set an explicit objective of appealing to the center right and the center left. That is a political goal. It is not a journalistic one. And it is a far cry from how Jack Knight instructed his newsroom: “Get the truth and publish it.” That is a journalistic goal. Media owners who substitute political goal posts for news values find refuge in sophistry. They lay claim to ethics; instead, they subvert them. Their path may be one of commercial convenience. Or of timidity. Or of appeasement to regulators, legislators and the president himself. Or the instinctual path of those who see the press only through the lens of politics. But a news outlet of that formulation is fated to compromise ethics when a rock-solid story moving toward publication is deemed to fall outside the designated political comfort zone.

Come for @sulliview.bsky.social's focus on former WaPo EIC Marty Baron's spot on comments about the wildly political content objectives of both David Ellison & Bari Weiss; stay for the criticism of the NYT's Mrs. Bezos fluff.
open.substack.com/pub/margaret...

Of course they are concentration camps. And @anatosaurus.bsky.social is right that once you accept the euphemism you are halfway to normalizing the thing.

She knows she's next, right?

Right?

To quote Ash, "It's a trick... "

So, drunk and failed the login enough times?

If this is what it takes to get America to obey the Leahy Law, I'll take it.

Legislation he'll ignore because the traitors' court mafe impeachment the only avenue for oversight of the presidency?