QUADAS-3: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies | Annals of Internal Medicine Assessing risk of bias and applicability is critical in diagnostic test accuracy reviews to ensure valid, relevant findings that can inform decision making and policy. This article introduces QUADAS-3...

QUADAS-3 was published in @annalsofim.bsky.social. Check out the latest version of the #QUADAS tool for #riskofbias assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/... and www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/...

The LATITUDES Network provides a library of #ValidityAssessment (AKA #RiskOfBias) tools for use in #EvidenceSyntheses such as #SystematicReviews. Researchers can register new tools and get access to training, see @jclinepi.bsky.social article: www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...

How to assess quality of evidence? Term not well defined but usually includes 3 elements: 1. Internal validity (AKA #RiskOfBias), 2. External validity, 3. Reporting quality. @latitudes-network.bsky.social deals with study validity and @equatornetwork.bsky.social aims to improve quality of reporting

What is a #SystematicReview (AKA #EvidenceSynthesis)? It’s a systematic and rigorous approach to gather, analyse, and integrate available research evidence on a specific topic or research question. Assessing the quality of evidence is an essential step.

#HelloWorld, we are now on @bsky.app! Please follow us if you want to learn more about the #ValidityAssessment (#RiskOfBias) for #EvidenceSyntheses such as #SystematicReviews. #firstpost

#HelloWorld, we are now on @bsky.app! Please follow us if you want to learn more about the #ValidityAssessment (#RiskOfBias) for #EvidenceSyntheses such as #SystematicReviews. #firstpost