On stage at #LavalVirtual. Guillaume presented Digital Twin technologies for Disaster Risk Reduction through SimexBuilder. Thank you to everyone who engaged afterwards!
Posts by XR Ireland
Thank you to Anne-Sophie Clayer, Gregory Maubon and Maxime Leroy for their support from Laval.
Attending? Come find us.
#LavallVirtual #XRIreland #SimexBuilder #ImmersiveTech
Grateful to Alain Pagani from @dfki.bsky.social, Pierre Yves Noel from @Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise, Jean-Pierre Lorre and his team at @linagora.com, and everyone who enabled us on this journey.
Guillaume is presenting at #LavalVirtual today - learnings on human decision-making inside digital twins, built on our teams' participation in @cortex2.bsky.social and our work on the @simexbuilder.com.
It was a pleasure to meet @gijsbutter.bsky.social at @unitedxr.eu, and to have at least one photograph from the event to show for it.
More on Culturama and Simexbuilder to follow.
The Virtual Worlds Association connects technology companies, research centres, and academia building Europe's digital future. This is where this work moves forward.
@culturama.org: End-to-end Cultural Heritage aggregation and dissemination platform. Launching soon.
Our focus: #disaster risk reduction, digital skills development, societal #resilience, and long-term value creation through interoperable #AI, #XR, and advanced interactive technologies.
@simexbuilder.com: Emergency simulation for disaster risk reduction across industry, civil protection, and humanitarian sectors.
XR Ireland is the first Irish SME in the Virtual Worlds Association.
Through this membership, we are bringing two platforms into the European ecosystem:
The coordination failure pattern appears in after-action reports from Hurricane Katrina, Grenfell Tower, Fukushima, and countless smaller incidents. The equipment arrived. The people arrived. The coordination did not.
What matters: Can Team A share information with Team B within required timeframe?
That is measurable. Most training programmes do not ask it because tools to measure coordination at scale have not existed.
Coming weeks: specific problems coordination failure creates.
Results:
- Grenfell: 3 services declared Major Incident independently (no mutual notification)
- Manchester Arena: "JESIP almost completely failed"
- Coordination principles "not muscle memory"
Not lack of procedures. Lack of joint training.
Most organisations measure: "We ran 2 exercises this year"
Belfast demo motivation: fixing coordination training.
#JESIP data (Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles):
- 33% of police commanders NEVER exercised jointly
- Only 8% train jointly every few months
Yet they are expected to coordinate seamlessly during major incidents.
What happens next: pilot exercises with real organisations, real scenarios, real participants, real feedback.
Demo day was relief. What comes next is harder.
What the demo did not prove: whether safety professionals will adopt it in their real workflows, whether the pricing model is right, whether onboarding is intuitive, whether 500 participants in a single exercise actually works at scale.
Those are different questions. They require different evidence.
What the #demo validated: architectural decisions hold up, #DTDL foundation works for exercise modelling, no-code authoring for domain experts is viable, multi-deployment is technically achievable.
Team A received the #hazmat alert at T+3 minutes.
Team B acted on it at T+11 minutes.
That 8-minute gap is where people could have been harmed.
That is measurable, evidence-based after-action review.
Not "how did everyone feel it went?"
Here is a concrete example:
The platform logs every #inject delivery, every decision point, every communication between roles.
After an exercise, the debrief is specific.
The #Technology in a #SimulationPlatform is the least interesting part.
The interesting part is what happens between people.
#Emergency #response failures are almost never caused by lack of equipment.
What breaks down is the coordination between the agencies operating that equipment.
These are architectural decisions. They determine what the platform can become, not just what it does today.
#DigitalTwin #TechnicalArchitecture #VR
The moment that made the room go quiet was not any of those five.
It was when Aura Studios showed the hands-on VR world-building preview. Seeing a training scenario rendered as a walkable environment changed the conversation from architecture to imagination.
5 things we showed at the Belfast engineering demo. No slide decks.
No-code exercise authoring.
Semantic foundation built on Digital Twin metamodels.
Local generative AI for context-aware interactions.
Multi-deployment architecture: cloud, on-premise, offline edge. Interoperability by design.
It was a pleasure to meet @gijsbutter.bsky.social at @unitedxr.eu, and to have at least one photograph from the event to show for it.
More on Culturama and Simexbuilder to follow.
The Virtual Worlds Association connects technology companies, research centres, and academia building Europe's digital future. This is where this work moves forward.
@culturama.org: End-to-end Cultural Heritage aggregation and dissemination platform. Launching soon.
Our focus: #disaster risk reduction, digital skills development, societal #resilience, and long-term value creation through interoperable #AI, #XR, and advanced interactive technologies.
@simexbuilder.com: Emergency simulation for disaster risk reduction across industry, civil protection, and humanitarian sectors.
XR Ireland is the first Irish SME in the Virtual Worlds Association.
Through this membership, we are bringing two platforms into the European ecosystem:
Is European data sovereignty a genuine selection criterion for your organisation, or something that appears in the RFP and gets waived?
#DataSovereignty #GDPR #EuropeanTech
The 10% tradeoff? Our scenario design tool does not handle participant data.
The sensitive information—who performed well, where the coordination gaps are—stays on European infrastructure.
Deliberate. Enforced at the architecture level, not just policy.
EU tech stack in practice: EU-hosted infrastructure, EU-owned providers, GDPR-native architecture, no US data transfers as default, no risk of unlawful US CLOUD Act interference.