Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Michael Morris

Post image

Harvey's brewery, Lewes, yesterday

18 hours ago 9 1 0 0

*Gusting*!

1 day ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Gutting Force 5 off Seaford, last Saturday

1 day ago 2 0 1 0
Post image

Mount Caburn and Ranscombe Camp, with Beddingham in the foreground, yesterday

2 days ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Below Wilmington Hill, April 2019

3 days ago 9 0 0 0
Post image

Bodiam castle, April 2021

4 days ago 1 0 0 0
Chart showing earnings gap 10 years after graduation, associated with having been in deep poverty at age 16, adjusted for demographic and university characteristics, and further adjusted for work characteristics: England

Chart showing earnings gap 10 years after graduation, associated with having been in deep poverty at age 16, adjusted for demographic and university characteristics, and further adjusted for work characteristics: England

Child poverty isn't just bad, it results in an enduring earnings gap.

The pay gap between graduates who grew up in poverty and those who didn't persists even between when they go to the same university, get the same degree and work for the same firm ⤵️

buff.ly/5VfX2Fi

5 days ago 14 12 1 2
The Wollstonecraft Society Lecture 2026: 28 April, London This year's Wollstonecraft Society Lecture will be given by Natalie Haynes, writer, classicist, journalist, broadcaster and comedian. She has written a series of novels based on classical mythology. The latest one, No Friend to this House, is about Jason, the Argonauts and Medea. The lecture, Myth vs Reality, will take place on Tuesday 28 April at 6:30 at Regent Street Cinema, London. Tickets are free but you need to register here. See also here for more details about the event.

This is happening in less than two weeks time! A must for all #Wollstonecraft fans, or #Wollstoncurious people who happen to be in London.

5 days ago 3 3 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

Looking west from the Caburn ridge, April 2015

5 days ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

Looking west towards the Glyndebourne ridge, April 2020

6 days ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Hope Gap, April 2017

1 week ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

Berwick Rectory and church, April 2022

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

Frank Furedi, Matt Goodwin, Rod Dreher, The Hungarian Conservative, Nigel Farage, J.D. Vance, Douglas Murray, we have beaten them all. Vladimir Putin, can you hear me? Vladimir Putin... your boys took a hell of a beating! Your boys took a hell of a beating!

1 week ago 40 9 1 0

I compare him with Bernard Williams. Both brilliant and, I think, lazy, but Williams's work opens up possibilities while Scruton's closes them down. I suspect that's not unrelated to their political views.

1 week ago 5 0 2 0

I broadly agree on the academic stuff: generally a clear (sometimes early) statement of a view that people find attractive, but not mostly deeply thought out. A former colleague who'd been a student at Birkbeck said he was distinctively kind and supportive to students.

1 week ago 3 0 1 0
Preview
How would Britain vote at the start of 2026? We take a detailed look at voting intention across multiple factors, including a new socio-economic classification

Essentially, if you feel economically secure and you are of working age, you vote Labour, and if you feel economically secure and are retired you vote Tory, and if you are economically insecure and working age you vote Green, and if you are economically insecure and retired to vote Reform:

1 week ago 169 29 27 5
Advertisement
Post image

Below Bostal Hill, April 2018

1 week ago 4 0 0 0

I think this may be the one:

Crispin Odey abandons £79mn libel case against the FT over sexual misconduct claims - www.ft.com/content/6966... via @FT

1 week ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Near Ripe, yesterday

1 week ago 7 0 1 0
Post image

The Firle Beacon ridge and Beddingham Hill, April 2024

1 week ago 0 0 0 0

Thank you!

1 week ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Seaford Head, April 2022

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

I'd be grateful if you added me.😊

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

I do still (after 35 years or so) like its style, though!

1 week ago 2 0 1 0

You can look at the argument if you want to. It's in section 8.6 of my The Good and the True, which should be available in institutions through OSO. Glancing at it again now, I see that it strictly depends on an assumption about causation which is very obviously open to question.

1 week ago 2 0 2 0
Advertisement

Not really. It was just about how agents can be responsible for their own actions.

1 week ago 2 0 1 0

(In fact I once presented my argument as an argument against Galen's view.)

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

I think my motivations were in that area: I wanted agents to be responsible for what they do, and I thought causal theories of action left the agent out altogether. (Even a view like Galen Strawson's, where the cause of an action is just a belief-desire pair.)

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

Of course the doing of an action will be a causing of something else. (The doing of a killing will be a causing of a death, e.g..)

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

I thought supervenience would do it, but maybe that was naive.

1 week ago 1 0 1 0