No, it favors the -winning- candidate, doesn't indicate who they disliked more.
Also, your thing about elections not being compatible with democracy- you are stupid. Google Athenian Direct Democracy and then US Representative Democracy. Come back when you think you have a B paper for me.

Also, how do you know the abstainers 'least favorite' candidate? Dude, you should go to bed, because you just sound dumber with each uninformed Blue MAGA post.

Listen you condescending dumbshit- no fucking shit. So, why didn't the DNC change their platform when they KNEW it was going to cost them big-time in swing states?

Spoiler: FUCKING MONEY

Fuck your worship of bought & paid-off failed heroes.

Goddamn, you are thick, son.

You've conveniently avoided discussing the DNC autopsy report. Stats don't lie. My PoliSci degree may not have taught me anything about 2-party, zero sum elections, but I did have to pass a statistics class.
Politicians are supposed to work for us (the ones who clearly wanted opposition to the war).

Take your issue up with the US Constitution for absolving them of their civic duties.
Civic lesson though: actually candidates should be representing their constituents who, as I said in my last post agreed with pushing a ceasefire >75% with >63% fully opposed to the war.

My case is you wanted thousands of muslim, young and progressive voters across the country to support policies promoting genocide, but didn't want about a dozen DNC leaders to change their policy to something polls showed an overwhelming percentage of Democrats agreed with?

Like I want 4 more years of this dumb shit from either of these pathetic manchildren.

So, you wouldn't have voted for Harris if she had have threatened to stop supporting sending weapons and money to support the Gaza conflict? Maybe, say after the Rafah invasion and when the death of journalists was over 100? Like, try to minimize that harm?

I think a lot of people agree with the DNC election autopsy report that says Harris likely lost because of her weak opposition to the genocide & journalist murders. They are probably worried the DNC is going to make the same mistake again.

Would have lost?

Is that what everyone likes to act like?

Right....big tent....so what're you thinking? Michelle/Liz Cheney?

Yep...winner's circle.

Dunno....if you're discussing other pastimes/interests with your peeps, it doesn't necessarily mean you're itching to go do them ATM.

Plus, a little innuendo among friends is usually just some lighthearted, attempt at randy humor rather than trying to convey how hard your DTF-meter is pegged. YMMV

You were obviously accusing him of joining in. Reads clear as day.

You said 'you' (meaning him) 'don't have to join in', saying he didn't have to, but did.

See how that works?

Your continued, convenient feigned ignorance about how English works is too contrived not to be eristic. Fuck off.

While just vibes - I think the vibe is HRC is super-smart, likely very observant and involved in anything going on around her..... while MT was just some dipshit, probably busy in the bathroom snorting coke and mostly concerned about her makeup.
(but fuck yeah, she should be made to testify).

You accused someone of joining in. Or, were you just saying one doesn't have to join in?

Context, Holmes. He said actions have consequences. If a smoker gets cancer, saying they likely brought it on themselves it isn't saying they deserve it.

You sound like a virtue-signaling white knight.

Rube slop.

At any rate, it played out like WWF. Those guys purposely nick their ears & foreheads because it causes a fuckton of blood without pain. Dude was practically in the WWF, has a WWF owner in the cabinet.

Guys who caught one in the audience was a real thing. But, doesn't prove or disprove on its own.

Not in this context - it's just stating the mechanism. Knowingly, CJ consciously empowered the creation of the mechanism by which she would be readily dead-named - thus she has been.

The statement points to fault, not desert.

I'll see your Catastrophic Recession and raise you one Stagflation.

Real question: If RFK Jr. dies of the measles, should I be sad?

So, you'll alienate allies to virtue-signal for a woman who championed the policies now grounding her. We aren't laughing at trans rights, but at a sellout who helped build the cage she’s now stuck in. She threw your kid under the bus for a seat at the table. This is about actions, not identity.

Did you accidentally set the timer for this post for a year later?

It's a slippery slope - soon they'll be upping the taxes on 2nd yachts worth over $4M.

So then you just blindly assumed. I would've never guessed that of you.

You're in denial. You admit that the Dems are paid-off genocide supporters who could but wouldn't fight genocide - but people should vote for that instead of the DNC changing their policy. You're just more politician-worshiping Blue MAGA. And I told you I voted for KH. Pay attention.

It's in the "secret" autopsy Martin won't release that Axios dropped. Libs want to turn that around- say The People should vote against their conscious rather than DNC leadership change their (paid for) stance. They knew what the polls said, and still fumbled it to MAGA. And they still get rich.