Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by PoochPest

We are looking at "need" for all defense line positions, but is there a player who has an ability to do MORE than college, with training and experience? If the floor, is what they did in college, what is the ceiling?

2 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Question: If Trump discusses how to protect his corrupt and illegal (and pedophilia-craving) administration in the Oval office, is that "official business" as SCOTUS proclaimed?
2nd Question: Why would anyone vote Republican? To protect corruption, crime and pedophilia?
Starting wars at all costs.

2 hours ago 0 0 1 0

Just ANOTHER reason to not elect Republicans.

2 hours ago 0 0 0 0

I talked to a number of people last night from various nationalities: the uniform question was "how could Americans vote for these people?"
Obviously, they wonder about either the mentality, or intelligence of Americans.

2 hours ago 1 0 1 0

Who elected this party of "OK, Steal from us?"

2 hours ago 0 0 0 0

"Looks like?" They ALL are. They are Also ALL Republicans (except for RFK, Jr. and Tulsi Gabbert.)

2 hours ago 1 0 0 0

for the most severe penalties.
SCOTUS, elected officials, are not "above us" but are only granted flexibility, as long as they DEMONSTRATE, their adherence to their responsibilities. THEY are not "free" as long as WE are not free.

2 hours ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

I would recommend, that crimes against the Constitution, be considered, as serious and available to life imprisonment, as any other.
Corruption, emoluments issues, deli erate decisions to violate Constitutionally granted liberties, AND SCOTUS decisions consistency in violation - all be considered

2 hours ago 2 0 1 0

The Republican Trump administration is more successful than any other Republican administration in history: at corruption, breaking laws (including against both individuals and the Constitution and nations.
I would say to Ben Franklin, we have "a Constitution, if we can keep it."

3 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Wow. If more Republicans had pancreatic cancer . . . interest in research would be different.

1 day ago 2 0 0 0

Great question. The invisible hand is doing fine. Political "solutions" are very much like "solutions" about race.

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

Patel IS unfit, simply with the threat to sue: IF Patel was coherent, he would know that both civil and criminal actions to court, allow investigations - on both sides.
Discovery.

Kash Patel reacts to The Atlantic report on alleged excessive drinking, absences www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mWb...

1 day ago 3 1 0 0

It is a statement, but taxing the "rich" (I can't call hundreds of billions "rich. It's beyond.)

1 day ago 2 1 0 0

people whose education is often developed in universities NOT started by them. Now foreign students have base level education started by the schools of OTHER countries.

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

Let's START at 40% and let them argue WHY they shouldn't pay.
All of them are using American infrastructure which everyone else paid for. Internet, educated and healthy employees, roads and bridges, the research that continues to expand our society and knowledge. SpaceX and Blue Origin use educated

1 day ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Justice Department refuses to assist French probe into Musk’s X, WSJ reports Musk faces questions as part of a year-long probe in France into suspected abuse of algorithms and fraudulent data extraction by X or its executives.

The Republican DOJ, argues that investigations into companies and industries, violates First Amendment rights of "free speech." Really? Knowing more is a violation of free speech? Republican logic.

Justice Department reportedly won't assist French probe into Musk’s X share.google/W9P2HKvg80BZ...

1 day ago 2 0 0 0

excuses for their family, their political party, their friends, or anyone, they bear the responsibility.
They said it wouldn't happen.
Is it a good idea not to insure your home in Florida? Because a storm will never come? I will never live with idiots. I can't.
But I'm in America.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Is the idea of blaming Republicans for everything a political statement?
Let's be clear, anyone who doesn't agree with Trump - should focus on blaming Republicans. Those who nominated him, confirmed his nominations, excused him, enabled him, voted for him and elected him.
When people make

3 days ago 0 0 1 0

don't know that they do.
If you ask how insurance works,
they don't realize that a larger pool means lower prices. Walmart knows, people who vote Republican don't.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

But we know it's not true.
But arguing from a "conservative" perspective, people will listen rather than simply. losing their mind. That is the goal. Argue policy, but tell them it's "centrist" or "moderate." Everyone, including people who vote Republican believe in universal healthcare. They just

3 days ago 0 0 1 0

I agree.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

And that was a reason not to vote for her? I looked at her and Trump. I talked to hundreds of people about this. Do you think you could change HER mind? Or Trump's?Do you think Netanyahu could sway Harris or Trump? (I'm not singling YOU out, but anyone.)Politics is leverage. Democracy is persuasion.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

will bear.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

he isn't any more "radical" than Sanders or AOC. I tell farmers that as a conservative, I would tax donations to PACS over $10K by 100% going up to more than 2000%. Make it personally painful to donate - but be able to pay for social services.
It's capitalism at its best - charge what the market

3 days ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

Democrats, just running in rural areas and small states, just offering an argument that FDR advanced 80 years ago, would be. considered "radical" by the incumbent Republicans.
Texas Republicans are terrified of Talerico. Because he argues that. billionaires should pay taxes! OMG! How radical! But

3 days ago 0 0 1 0

population, years before the herd. "To conserve" is the center ("centrist?") of air, water, land, freedom, peace, and other "conservative" (old fashioned) values.
But I have never met anyone who disagrees, unless they embraced bullshit definitions of Republicans.

3 days ago 1 0 0 0

I define myself as "conservative," not "Conservative." It. I fixed people, which is intentional.
But I also define Progressives as THE most conservative people in politics.
They foresee issues before other people. They plan, and discuss ways of addressing pollution, climate, economics, race,

3 days ago 1 0 1 0

I'm not sure who is "centrist" enough to be all you mentioned. It seems kind of "leans fascist" to me.

3 days ago 0 0 1 0

I can go for that. But I also believe that if someone accepts a job, asks for votes, they should be doing the job for people. All people. They are asking for Responsibility, not money.
Do the damn job and killing people isn't the job.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

Sorry, I disagree.
I want everything torn down and trucked down to Florida and dumped in HIS ballroom, HIS bathroom, HIS driveway, HIS closets and dumped on HIS bed. Trump thinks he can be vindictive? Retribution? Wait. For. It.

3 days ago 1 0 2 0