So basically, if Alphaghetti came to numbers only version, and you threw some at a wall, it would look in the sound a lot like KP in this clip.

True, but depending on how big his family is, and how many friends he has, couple of times a month could head up if he’s trying to get around to a whole lot of folks.

My point is essentially that is functionally like the whitehead at the top of a really deep pimple. When he finally pops, it will provide a sense of relief. But it won’t get to the depth of the root causes.

He’s a symptom, and he has triggered more symptoms. But getting rid of him won’t be enough.

I absolutely agree that the POTUS personally despises the VPOTUS.

He accepted him as a running mate, so that he would have the support (so he believed) of the tech oligarchs et al.

And the current POTUS is absolutely a criminal, on many levels.

Sentence structure matters!
And if it’s been since 2017, Chris needs to take a break already.

… limited to people with a particular security clearance level.

Biden‘s administration may not have announced how many potential terrorist attacks were detected, what type of terrorism may have been at risk, and how many that administration stopped.

KP is just using buzz words as filler. Twit.

… they didn’t deal with effectively, or in time. Again, this in particular would be relevant if they’re using the term terrorist to refer to USAsians resisting the current federal administration.

Presumably, some of the information about potential terrorist attacks would be

He leaves all of those pieces of information blank, and most people still (especially right now with the war with Iran), still default to assuming that a terrorist is a Muslim person from somewhere outside of the US.

It also doesn’t give us any information about other “terrorist threats” that

… a shooting intended for a place of worship, or an incel in his basement threatening to burn down the White House.

We also don’t know how he’s using the term “terrorist”. Is he using the KNoem version, where it’s someone local who is planning violence at a protest?

There’s so many logical fallacies in what he’s saying here.

First of all, we don’t know what kind of “terrorist activity“ he’s talking about. Yes, stopping someone from doing harm is important. But we don’t know whether he’s talking about a terrorist threat at the level of 9/11

It’s always a shell game.

… declare martial law in to quote restore “public safety”.
Like empire’s before this one, they will claim that this is a temporary circumstance, and then find reasons over, and over again, to maintain it as the status quo.

JDV was chosen for VP precisely because he’s not charismatic or competent.

… as empires fall into their collapse arc, JDV’s puppeteers are fully expecting pushback.

With already having acclimatized both the population and the news cycle to military presence enlarged cities, if 47’s supporters replicate their efforts of January 6, then JDV will be prompted to

… and the VPOTUS will be moved up into the seat of power.

They know that he has zero support among the most virulent supporters of the current POTUS. That won’t matter if it doesn’t have to go to an election.

In fact, I suspect that as has been the case over and over again through history

… any existing policies, structures, and legislation that limit their profits or their agenda.

They were always going to give him enough rope to hang himself eventually, and one way or another, I think that the endgame has always been that 47 will either die or fall ill

… if the POTUS died or was otherwise incapacitated, he was suddenly delighted to work with DJ T.

I have long suspected (and I still think they’re trying for this), that the goal was to give 47 enough leash to create chaos while they’ve worked behind the scenes on dismantling

It’s not JDV himself who is a potential problem.

It’s the fact that he’s a puppet for people like Thiel.

He publicly ranted on and on about how much he disliked 45/47, but when the opportunity came for them to have someone in a position to rise to the seat of power

RIGHT?!? So many questions! And if that is a major selling point that you need to celebrate on the packaging, what else is in there that is being overly … celebrated?

… corporations, who claim that an increase in price is directly related to a temporary circumstance, to pass their reduced costs, along to their customers once that circumstance is no longer in effect.

And legislators, especially now, are certainly not going to promote that kind of requirement.

Every time they push profit margins higher, people pay, for as long as they are able to do so.

Which essentially reinforces the model and the mindset that exponential profits and absolutely obscene price gouging are normal.

There’s no legal requirement for

The people who are making money handover fist, want to make as much money as they can, as quickly as they can, for as long as they can, before the whole thing collapses. Then they take their money and they go and do something else that will make the money hand over fist again.

Because they make an already ludicrous level of profit, and we keep paying because we have a society founded on a financial principle that if the market can bear it, keep pushing the envelope on profit.

The plan is never to look at when that will become unbearable.

Yes. This is, I think, the fifth in a series that have been put out so far.

They’re all the same in terms of visual style and audio style, and the same tone of content, but with different details.

It seems to me that that’s always the difficulty. There are people who have high ethical standards and want to do things and use innovation within the context of moral guidelines.

But there are always enough of the ruthless and greedy willing to blow good intentions to smithereens for profit.

From the little I know of him, it does feel like he looks at the rest of humanity as some sort of experiment that he’s observing rather than as fellow beings to whom he relates in anyway.

I don’t know if he just lacks empathy, or if he uses intellectual distance as a shield.

… with the info tech companies? Instead, they showed them what they’ll be facing in general, and told them to prepare for it, preferably in the next six months, but in no longer than 18 months, and then wished them luck?

Or were the banks among the 40 companies?

… in the world information market.

Several of those companies have proven themselves to be less than ideally trustworthy when it comes to people‘s private information.

And am I also correct and understanding that when it comes to the banks, they didn’t give them the information the way they did

Thank you for this. I really appreciate it.

I think I had gotten most of the key points.

What I’m still a bit uncertain about is whether or not they’ve essentially handed over this capacity to 40 companies, 40 American companies, that they deemed worthy of having this power

Yes

I know virtually nothing about coding or international finances.

Nonetheless, in reading this article, I get that general feeling of, “this is not good”.

Yet another example of the fact that just because we can do certain things doesn’t mean we should do certain things.