Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Amy Landers

LOL I'd prefer the Ralph Lauren teddy bear, please

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

What to like-it allows you to tell the algo what you don't want to see in natural language. It sort of works for a bit then.

1 week ago 3 1 0 0

My interest in 1L property was defeasible.

1 week ago 11 1 2 1

That does seem problematic

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0

Fair enough Ed.

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0

The McDouble specimen is another travesty. But Tiffany's are beautiful.

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Why are some of these specimen pics so bad? Hoka blue, apparently

2 weeks ago 2 0 2 1
Advertisement

You can only do that if everyone is acting in good faith. Look what happened to the phrase "fake news"

3 weeks ago 1 0 1 0

Those stacks are way too neat :)

3 weeks ago 2 0 0 0

Yes, although a model for a more rigorous examination standard was envisioned (by @marklemley.bsky.social ) years ago, this is not it. "Born strong" sounds like a sad trombone given the agency's current lack of morale.

3 weeks ago 4 0 0 0

Wait, is hope a scam?

3 weeks ago 2 0 0 0

Sotomayor, our IP specialist, also weighs in...

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

"The Fourth Circuit’s holding thuswent beyond the two forms of liability recognized in Grokster and Sony. It also conflicted with this Court’s repeatedadmonition that contributory liability cannot rest only on a provider’s knowledge of infringement and insufficient action to prevent it."

3 weeks ago 1 2 0 0

From one of the most prominent AI legal scholars…🧵🪡

4 weeks ago 5 6 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

Lacoste’s new alligator, first time made of flowers. Does it function as a mark or as ornament?

4 weeks ago 13 3 4 1

I mean, they just want people to upload things to AI, right? They’re so thirsty for data. It’s embarrassing.

4 weeks ago 13 1 0 0

@dsc250.bsky.social You were right.....

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

There was a time when the language pulled back toward an "examination" mindset (outside of design patents!) but it seems like it is back.

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

They must miss the '90's when applicants were considered the USPTO's "customers." www.uspto.gov/sites/defaul...

1 month ago 2 0 1 0

Link to decision that a person does not include a sovereign: www.uspto.gov/sites/defaul...

1 month ago 2 1 1 0
How AI Destroys Institutions Civic institutions—the rule of law, universities, and a free press—are the backbone of democratic life. They are the mechanisms through which complex societies

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

1 month ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

Vogue sues "a one-woman editorial operation that sells fewer than 100 copies per issue" Gift link www.nytimes.com/2026/03/17/s...

1 month ago 6 7 0 2

“Using price to guide scientific and cultural production—which is to say, using IP—may have costs not only for efficiency, but also for distributive justice and informational privacy”

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Must read-- Domestic manufacturing and small business status now favorably viewed for IPR review....

1 month ago 2 2 0 0

The modernization plans involve testing initial software components at six courts this year, with the goal ​of implementing parts of it in district courts nationwide next year

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Those who invest in technology assume a free market, or at least grounded on learnable patterns and regs. This decision could have ripple effects on ROI decisions for decades.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

An informative read as always.

1 month ago 2 1 0 0

“This appears to be yet another step by the current USPTO administration to strengthen the hand of NPE patentees in their battles against accused infringers”

1 month ago 4 2 0 0

It's giving Truman Capote

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

That’s an ideal plaintiff actually. They should have very precise records.

1 month ago 60 13 0 0