I think the real rule is “vote for the better option, even if you don’t like either option”

In 2026 this will almost always be indistinguishable from “vote blue no matter who.”

it’s a valid question

Never good when things get stuck at the colon

Or is the idea that the patsy kid was up there shooting blanks and there was another hidden shooter somewhere killing and maiming bystanders to make it all look more realistic?

It’s all so incredibly stupid, the more you think about it, the stupider it gets.

and even if he was, is the idea that they were going to count on a random kid from Butler on a rooftop to shoot the guy right next to Trump, but not Trump?

Trump is an idiot but I think even he could see the problem with this plan.

anything‘s possible with Trump I guess, but this guy appears to be a total crank, I don’t believe he has WH sources

ha for me as well

He never even got a Presidential Medal of Freedom. Sad!

See what you think! We usually get the ”Sensitive Marinara” but the regular Marinara seems to be the people’s choice. I like it plain (and not too abundant) on spaghetti with grated cheese.

Some people say that it declined after Campbell’s bought it in 2024, but I haven’t noticed any difference.

an illustration of a bowl of falafel with smiley faces Alt: an illustration of a bowl of falafel with smiley faces

just needs a few of these to put the spring back in his step

sounds great! I just usually prefer tomato sauce without added sugar in it, especially if I’m just putting the sauce and cheese on my pasta. Rao’s reminds me of the sauce my grandmother and aunts would make.

If the only store-bought options were Prego and Ragu I would agree—but I’m pretty sure that Rao’s is better than I could make, and it’s $6.99 a jar.

whoa there David I‘m not sure Excel can handle those big fancy numbers

Diffusione del cognome Sanseverino - Mappe dei Cognomi Italiani Scopri la diffusione del cognome Sanseverino in Italia attraverso una mappa interattiva.

it‘s not a very rare surname in Italy fwiw, and in many cases derives from a toponym, since there are several towns named San Severino… so I don’t think this guy is necessarily descended from the famous family.

www.cognomix.it/mappe-dei-co...

His attorney was also Mark Robinson’s attorney when he sued CNN for defamation, so there you go.

I don’t see how this gets anywhere near a trial tbh, I’m not at all a lawyer but the complaint seems absurd, similar to the ones that generated Trump’s corrupt ”settlements” with Meta, X, ABC and CBS.

plot twist, that’s also what Trump associates it with

ok, turns out that this lawyer also sued CNN for Mark Robinson, I’m out

turns out that even in jaded 2026 these shitheads still have the power to shock and disgust

"former advisers," and similar formulations. Any such purported sources could not possibly possess firsthand knowledge of the events described, both because the sources were not in a position to know and because the events described did not occur.

I know I shouldn‘t waste my time on this dumb lawsuit, but this was funny.

If the sources are anonymous, what’s the basis for asserting that they were “not in a position to know”?

More relevantly perhaps, there is no reason to think that Barro was talking about people taking RyanAir

satire." As is standard protocol, easily verified, and would have been known by any credible FBI source, breach equipment is provided to all FBI protection details. The claim that it was requested r provided to Director Patel's detail because he "had been unreachable behind Locked doors" is pure fantasy.

Similarly, “no use of breaching equipment to reach Director Patel was ever discussed or contemplated” would be a substantive denial.

Instead the response is ”no ‘request’ was made for breaching equipment because protection details already have breaching equipment.”

“Kash has never been to the Poodle Room“ is a substantive denial. “Kash does not drink to excess in the Poodle Room” very much is not.

The “substantive responses“ seem to boil down to: “people may have told the Atlantic that Kash is bad, but in reality, Kash is good!”

Not a lawyer, but this doesn’t look like a suit you file because you think you can can win. It looks more like a PR/messaging thing.

a man 's got to know his limitations is written above a man Alt: Clint Eastwood says “a man 's got to know his limitations”

at this point frankly I care less about the Turing Test and more about the Dirty Harry test

Yeah, I don’t see what counting letters in a name (or knowing how to spell) has to do with reasoning.

The real issue here is that the AI gamely gives a try and confidently gets it wrong, instead of saying “I’m not able to do that.” And that does seem like a very real issue.

riuscendo a far tacere chissà quanti agenti del Secret Service e la polizia locale, rischiando di finire in galera per omicidio colposo se il piano non funzionasse alla perfezione

per cosa, per guadagnare qualche puntino nei sondaggi che lo mostravano già in testa di non poco?

ma dai, siamo seri