The headline writers seem to be doing that conversation dirty. The participants do not appear to be arguing for theft as a form of protest. Piker himself says it’s impossible for him to steal based on a childhood experience.
The writers made a great call with the Woke Bill Kristol plot line. Good to have him on side.
Tucker’s switch on Trump is part of his lifelong con. Changing his beliefs whenever needed to reach a new audience. But his sexism, racism, and anti-semitism do appear to be deeply held beliefs. And he might be genuinely sad Trump doesn’t fully share them.
youtube.com/watch?v=HXQU...
It’s odd that Palantir chose this moment to argue that ‘the limits of soft power…have been exposed.’ The capacity of America to inflict its will upon the world through force has never appeared weaker.
www.nytimes.com/2026/04/22/b...
Ask Claude for a 30 minute hip mobility routine. Google the exercise to find videos. Do it 3x a week. Your hip will never hurt again. 😄
They have control over the Supreme Court, the dominant majority of media platforms, and the more violent supporter base. There’s no reason at the moment for them to be intimidated. The next elections need to come with vast retribution to make them fearful of the populace again.
I don’t think he really injures people; deliberately doing so is very rare in general. But I’m happy to call the things Draymond does ‘assault’, because he regularly attacks unprepared players. Sabonis, Gobert, Poole, etc. Even in his last game, he was sad at the end so he punched Booker.
They simply do not care if you know they’re full of shit. They just say whatever is marginally beneficial in the moment with a complete absence of object permanence.
I’m not really sure about him. His approach to Draymond has always felt a little amoral to me. Like, the defining aspect of his coaching is ignoring repeated assaults by his player, because doing so helps him win. I dunno.
They’re arguments on this, as with everything, are just pure bullshittery. They are aware of the hypocrisy, yet they plow right on.
@whstancil.bsky.social has been yelling at commentators about this non-stop. Will be interesting to see if he begrudgingly credits you with a good point. 😂
Guys, he’s talking about different political actors. In the first instance, any Democrat with half a brain should also criticise the pardon…
Do we want them to be on our side? They’re powerful, wealthy people who run corporations that, on balance, could well be making negative contributions to society.
Liz doesn’t seem to be attacking. Just odd syntax. Anyways, they should pay you to be on TV. 😂