I was literally saying this to everyone sitting around me at the show. This is how Hangman can go for the title again.

Not overwhelmingly and the question about Hassan was extremely biased and only gave out of context things he said that would look bad for anyone.

I mean, kinda.

You've literally added nothing to this argument. So you've proven your own note wrong, you dumb cunt.

Swerve maybe? Lio Rush and swerve had one of the greatest matches I've ever seen live at the second Defy show in 2017.

Because I'm trying to find out the reason why people thought that was good? It was just a hot load of nothing.

I'm not. I just think that when you get called out on something you need to prove the accusation wrong. And he literally just did the exact accusation that she accused him of. Clearly, people like that for some reason and I don't know why.

How did he answer it perfectly? She said he hasn't provide any hard numbers or plans, and then he continued to not provide any hard numbers or plans. That just proved her point. He said fucking nothing in that answer. Just give one plan detail on one of your policies. That's all he had to do.

He didn't answer the question and proved Katie Porter's point, correct. I don't see why people like this response so much.

No it wasn't. He did an answer the fucking question and literally proved your point. Just give one plan detail on any of your proposals. That's all he needed to do to prove her wrong. And he didn't. I don't see why people like that nothing of a response so much.

How? It literally just proved Katie Porters point. I honestly, don't see why that so many people are loving, that complete nothing of an answer.

She literally said he never has any data or hard numbers and just says things people want to hear. He then went on to say no data or hard numbers and said things that clearly people like you wanted to hear. He completely validated her point.

How? She said he didn't have any hard data or plans and just said the what and not the how. Then he proceeded to not provide any hard data or plans and not mention the how at all. That's a horrible counter too Porter's point.

I set next to a family at the show whose kids were loudly chanting Fuck UCE along with their parents. It was very wholesome.

That seems completely reasonable to me.

No it isn't.

Bad things can come from a union. The idea in question is not a crazy idea and makes perfect sense to me.

You need to hold Democratic politicians to a higher standard than you do the voters.

Last election, we all saw how voters would rather not vote than vote for someone enabling a genocide.

What is your definition of agency? Because I would say shutting up and vote for this person committing genocide because the other guy is worse is absolutely giving up your agency more than voting third party.

No! Because it's not going far enough. There's no fucking reason why we shouldn't have universal healthcare. And these fucking bandaid solutions for a gaping flesh wound is not fucking good enough. As long as healthcare isn't considered a universal right, we are not going in the right direction.

On healthcare they stopped. Overall they don't. They have gone way to the right on immigration and trans rights, etc.

Not doing a public option, even though Joe Biden explicitly campaigned on it, and then never mentioned it during his presidency at all. Kamala Harris not having medicare, for all on her '24 platform after running on it in '20.

What? No. They were going in the right direction. And then they stopped going that direction and refuse to go farther. The ACA was a step towards the right direction, and then they stopped taking any of those steps. How is that hard to understand?

They had a super majority in Obamas first term and fucking squandered it. Which is technically outside of the arbitrary fifteen year period you mentioned earlier. Democrats could do more if the leadership whipped votes to actually help the American people. Which they never do.

Democrats sometimes taking one step to the left doesn't matter when they're constantly taking multiple steps to the right.

You understand the phrase "one step forward, two steps back", right? Democrats have been going so far to the right that every time they take a tiny step toward the left, they're still going the wrong direction because they immediately go the other way after they do it.

You didn't ask me to name reasons why I think they were going the wrong direction. You gave things that you thought were going in the right direction, and I gave you reasons why I think they actually aren't. Supporting genocide is the wrong direction. No universal healthcare is the wrong direction.

Blue states took action to try and mitigate the complete failure of the Democratic party to codify the law on a federal level.

How does that destroy my argument? Honestly that helps my argument for why the federal politicians don't wanna do anything and just leave it to the States. Because then they can take credit for the state politicians actually doing something while they continue to just take bribes from corporations.