All Decisions

See this and other recent decisions here: bit.ly/3ATwu7B

The BSA found the item was clearly signalled as approaching the issue from a particular perspective, referred to the existence of other views, and the broadcaster had reported extensively on the issue, emphasising a range of perspectives, within the period of current interest

The complainant considered the segment was unbalanced as it only provided a viewpoint in favour of the Bill and genetic modification. However, the Authority found the broadcast did not breach standards

The host interviewed a biological sciences professor about the Bill’s progress, and whether reducing regulation around genetic modification was a good idea

The BSA has not upheld a complaint that an interview on Afternoons with Jesse Mulligan about the Gene Technology Bill breached the balance standard
www.bsa.govt.nz/decisions/al...

All Decisions

See this and other recent decisions here: bit.ly/3ATwu7B

The audience could also reasonably be expected to be aware of significant viewpoints on greyhound racing through other media coverage

The BSA found the item was clearly presented as approaching the issue from the industry’s perspective and adequately included significant alternative views through comments by the 1News reporter, and Racing Minister Winston Peters

The complainant alleged the item was ‘one sided and seriously unbalanced’ by nearly exclusively presenting the industry’s perspective without including viewpoints in support of the ban

The BSA has not upheld a complaint that a 1News broadcast about the greyhound racing industry’s perspective on their impending ban was unbalanced

www.bsa.govt.nz/decisions/al...

Classifications & timebands are an excellent tool to help you make informed viewing/listening choices for you and your whānau. Check out our video guide: www.bsa.govt.nz/broadcasting...

Six of the 10 most unacceptable terms relate to race, ethnicity or culture. The N-word remains least accepted, with 70% deeming it totally unacceptable on air. The C-word cemented its place in the top three. See the full report (Warning: language may offend): www.bsa.govt.nz/research-and...

Public tolerance for offensive language in broadcasting has fallen in the past four years, partly reversing a long-term trend of softening attitudes. Racial slurs and terms targeting specific communities continue to be seen as least acceptable

We asked New Zealanders where they draw the line with strong language. Our new report on language that may offend in broadcasting reveals some fascinating shifts in attitudes: www.bsa.govt.nz/news/bsa-new...

All Decisions

See this and other recent decisions here: bit.ly/3ATwu7B

Noting the significant public interest in the segment, the BSA found no harm justifying its intervention to limit the broadcaster’s freedom of expression. The privacy standard did not apply

In the context, including comments pre-alerting listeners to the content, the Authority found it was unlikely to disproportionately offend or disturb the audience. Those not wishing to listen were given a reasonable chance to switch off

The BSA has not upheld a complaint about a Midday Report segment on Charlie Kirk’s death, including a recording of Kirk’s final interaction and the gunshot that killed him. The complainant considered it offensive and lacking in decency to broadcast Kirk’s final moments

The BSA has not upheld a complaint that two Morning Report interviews, about funding for a campaign to encourage Māori to register on the Māori electoral roll, were inaccurate and displayed ‘anti-Māori bias’

This & other recent decisions can be seen here: bit.ly/3ATwu7B

The team at TV Guide have taken a look under the bonnet of TV classifications/advisory labels – the numbers and letters you see on-screen and in programme listings that help you make informed choices on what you and your children watch. Well worth a read: www.thepost.co.nz/culture/3608...

All Decisions

See this and other recent decisions here: bit.ly/3ATwu7B

The issue has been the subject of other coverage, meaning the likelihood of any real harm or the audience being left uninformed was reduced, and did not outweigh the broadcaster’s freedom of expression

It was sufficient under the balance standard to acknowledge the existence of the alternative perspective through comments from the Minister of Land Information about his decision not to change the name

The BSA found the comment was opinion and didn’t reach the threshold for denigrating a section of the community; the broadcast was framed as being from the perspective of community members disappointed by the decision

The complaints alleged an interviewee’s comment that those against the name change were ‘usually older…always white’ was racist, ageist, and of ‘questionable’ accuracy, and it was unbalanced, biased and unfair to include only interviews with supporters of the name change

The BSA has not upheld two complaints about a 1News item on the Government’s rejection of an application to officially change the name of Russell to the town’s original name, Kororāreka
www.bsa.govt.nz/decisions/al...

Ngā mihi o Te Wiki o Te Reo Māori | Happy Māori Language Week! We weave te reo Māori into our everyday work and offer our people the chance to build their language skills with te reo lessons #reomāori #TeWikioTeReoMāori

Ever thought of complaining about a TV or radio programme? Check out our website for quick guide videos, multilingual resources on the complaints process and tools for making informed viewing and listening choices www.bsa.govt.nz

All Decisions

See this and other recent decisions here: bit.ly/3ATwu7B

The reference to deductions being “20% off their ‘tax bill’”, rather than deducting 20% of a new asset’s value from a business’s ‘taxable income’, was materially inaccurate in the context, the BSA found