I am extremely excited to join the @cepr.org International Trade & Regional Economics programme as a Research Affiliate! Excited to connect, collaborate, and contribute to this amazing network!

How does price transparency affect a market?🤔

In our new paper, Kevin Tran, @leonardomadio.bsky.social, Mark J. Tremblay, and I analyze Airbnb’s policy change in the EU, where cleaning fees became fully transparent. The surprising finding: transparency doesn’t lead to lower prices. Here’s why:

New @cep-lse.bsky.social discussion paper from @fabrizioleone.bsky.social on Global Robots and the need to think about how both suppliers and customers respond to regulation (because the way suppliers respond amplifies economic effects). cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/downloa...

Hey #EconSky! I am on the market this year.

Check my profile for the thread with the paper!

You can find all the other great candidates from Warwick at @warwickecon.bsky.social

⚠️ 4 days left to apply to the RIEF PhD meeting on Global Issues in Aix-en-Provence!

Thanks to @cepr.org, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, Cepremap and PSE for making it happen.

Hey #EconSky! Submissions are now open for the 12th edition of the Warwick PhD Conference! A great opportunity for PhD students at all stage to present their papers and meet colleagues from other institution!

You can find the call for paper here:
warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/econ...

Thanks Simon! These words mean a lot to me!

🔵 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 can you read more about this paper and my research?

👉 Check out my website: fabrizioleone.github.io

And do get in touch if you have questions!

Thanks for reading!

(8/8)

🔵 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 thinking about policies, what should policymakers do?

👉 Consider the responses of 🤖 sellers. The optimal 🤖 tax/subsidy can change when doing so

👉 Be aware of the spillover effects induced by unilateral policy changes

(7/8)

🗝️𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀🗝️

1⃣ 𝗔𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: MNEs' responses amplify by 40% the aggregate & distributional effects of policy interventions

2⃣ 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿: Local policies can produce global outcomes if markets are linked via MNEs' global sales networks

(6/8)

I quantify the effects of taxing/subsidizing 🤖 adoption under  2 scenarios:

👉𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸: MNEs 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 change market entry and pricing choices after the policy change

👉𝗡𝗲𝘄: MNEs 𝗰𝗮𝗻 change market entry and pricing choices after the policy change 🆕

(5/8)

🔵 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 do I do and find?

👉Collect new data on MNEs producing 🤖 and their global sales

👉Develop and estimate a multi-country general equilibrium model of 🤖 adoption➕oligopolistic MNEs competing to sell 🤖

👉Simulate currently debated policy counterfactuals

(4/8)

🔵 𝗪𝗵𝗼 are these MNEs?

👉 They have HQ mainly in 🇯🇵 and central 🇪🇺, where >50% of new 🤖 are produced every year

👉 They have local branches that sell 🤖 ➕ "integration services" (e.g., customization) to users worldwide

👉 Stable set of MNEs over time

(3/8)

This paper: 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙮-𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 responses can change what we know about the effects of these policies‼️

I study the global market of 🤖. Ideal setting:

👉🤖 are a leading type of automation technology

👉𝟭𝟬 multinational enterprises (MNEs) hold 𝟵𝟬% of global sales

(2/8)

🔵 𝗪𝗵𝘆 do we care?

Automation (e.g., 🤖 and AI) is on the rise 📈

Trade-off: productivity gains vs job displacement ➡️ debate about policy interventions (tax or subsidies)

Current debate focuses on adopters, i.e., the 𝙙𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 of the automation industry

(1/8)

Thrilled to share my job market paper: 𝙂𝙡𝙤𝙗𝙖𝙡 𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙨 🌍🤖

❓Which firms supply robots? How do they respond to policies fostering or discouraging automation?

🔗fabrizioleone.github.io/files/Global_Robots_Fabr...

🧵The 5 Ws of global robot supply