“'I’ve never experienced anything like this in my entire life,' the congresswoman said, fighting back tears.
"She described the way people were laying down inside as “like sardines.”
“'It is frightening in there,' she said. 'It is disgusting'..."
azmirror.com/2026/04/10/i...
Epstein Victims Set for House Hearings After Melania Trump Speech: Comer
www.newsweek.com/epstein-vict...
AI images, unverified smears, attack ads, and dismissing fact-checkers as the enemy. Sounds less like independent research and more like Maple MAGA. Canada deserves better than importing that playbook.
3. Words have consequences. So does spreading unverified claims about someone, regardless of how you found them.
2. That’s the same claim in a news wrapper.
Nobody here is defending shitty people. We’re defending accuracy. There’s a meaningful difference between a 2013 public event and a lifelong friendship and carelessly blurring that line damages a real person’s reputation.
1. You started with “lifelong friend.” Now it’s “went to school together and seen once in 2013.” Those are very different claims — and the second one actually proves my point.
The PressProgress article you cited is literally reporting ON Canada Proud’s attack ads. That’s not an independent source.
no independent reporter has actually verified that the woman in this photo IS Ghislaine Maxwell. Only Canada Proud is making that claim. That’s not journalism. That’s a political hit job.
And this is the same group that’s been spreading AI-generated fake images of Carney on “Epstein’s island.” When you have to fabricate evidence, you don’t have a case. You have propaganda.
Multiple fact-checkers (Lead Stories, Full Fact, Snopes) found no evidence of a friendship. Carney’s team confirmed Maxwell was his sister-in-law’s school acquaintance — they “bumped into each other.”
Canada Proud is running ads implying Carney is “friends with Ghislaine Maxwell” based on a photo from a public festival in Oxfordshire in 2013. That’s it. One public event, a decade before he ran for PM.
Buttigieg: "The big thing that's different now is that in many periods in American history, you have inflation and then the administration does things to reduce it. Right now, we have the administration actively making prices higher."
Do you have a credible source for that? There’s no verified evidence that Diana Fox Carney and Ghislaine Maxwell were ‘lifelong friends.’ Most of what’s circulating is either AI-generated images or people misrepresenting a single public event photo.
Another strange day from Trump World, where the insanity never ends.
Go for it!!! 😅 ughhh he’s exhausting.
Your reply makes perfect sense.👌 But don’t bother his logic is convoluted and he just wants to argue. 🙄
You came in predicting a Trump dynasty. You ended up defending the King of England, arguing my own points back at me, copy pasting my words I’m good. We’re done. Check yourself. You’re arguing with yourself. I’m going to let you have the last word you clearly need it more than I do.
Pretty words. But you still brought up Schumer. You still brought up defending Trump. Unprompted. By you. Scroll up.
Seriously? I quoted you directly. If you have a comprehension problem with your own words, that’s not really my issue. 😊
Schumer may not be flashy, and he’s not out there screaming into cameras, but that’s not his style and never has been. He’s a behind the scenes operator who has delivered for New York for decades. Not every fighter looks the same. The loud ones aren’t always the effective ones.
I believe I already explained this. Not a fan of repetition.
Nobody said you were defending Trump. And nobody mentioned Schumer. You did both of those just now. This conversation has gotten away from you a little, hasn’t it? 😊
Actually Dems HAVE been stepping up. record activism and resistance at every level. Maybe check what’s actually happening before writing the eulogy from up there. You started this conversation with Trump as an unstoppable king and now you’re complaining about vacation days. Quite a downgrade. 😊
Ha! Fair enough. But you’re the one who came in predicting a dynasty and left defending the King of England. I’m fine with my back. 😊 Sounds to me like a reply from someone that has nothing left and resorts to insults. Typical, enjoy your evening.
lol! Not to be disrespectful but, you do realize you walked right into that one. 😬
Ha! You just accidentally argued my side. so you’re telling me a head of state can have limited ceremonial power and not actually be a dictator? Funny, that’s exactly what I’ve been saying about Trump this whole time. Glad we finally agree. 😊
😂 Sometimes the best material writes itself!
You’re worried about American democracy… from a constitutional monarchy?
You realize your head of state is literally on your money. 👑💰
Ha! moving the goalposts now? that’s what people do when they’re losing the argument! 😄 You’re wasting my time.
Actually, yes courts have enforcement mechanisms, contempt powers, and the entire federal marshal system behind them. And spoiler: executives who defy court orders tend to not end well historically. But sure, keep predicting from the cheap seats.
