This is it. This is the editorial that nails everything wrong with not only celebrating the recent psychedelic EO but the flaw at the heart of where our modern psychedelic renaissance has ended up.
Posts by Lukas A. Basedow, PhD
I don't know if I'm just turning into a Luddite but replacing participants with technology seems just preposterous to me. Imo it completely destroys the human part of psychological science.
Years ago @mikeduncan.bsky.social told me "you can rewrite shit but you can't rewrite nothing" and it's made every draft easier since.
Don't be shy to take on a little two-week side project. These five months will be the most precious three years of your academic journey.
That's it for this week. Spend the first half of the week on finishing Invincible (again) but next week will have more time for papers🥳
Some great insights into the drug discovery process. Also kind of a bummer since imho nothing has fundamentally changed in the 20 years since publication.
www.nature.com/articles/130...
Very much appreciate the clear language and straightforward argument made here. A convincing model of adapting empathy to the therapeutic situation, especially appreciate the discussion of Motivational Interviewing .
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
The technical details are beyond me but the idea itself is incredible. Impressive effort and extensive work to actually invent something that never occurred before (afaik).
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
I was excited for more drug user research but it turned out to be a very biological paper with a focus on preclinical data. Still interesting but for humans we just don't have any reliable data regarding most drug interactions.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
As promised I read this fantastic paper by @dingdingpeng.the100.ci next. An inspiring use of clear language to describe a complex problem. Also a great reminder in general to be clear about the assumptions plating a role in your research.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Quite a fascinating look into a topic I don't understand. Definitely an ambitious project that reminded me that I had wanted to read a paper on cohort effects for ages (see next skeet).
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Not a paper per se but nonetheless a very interesting read and highy relevant to clinical psychological science.
www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v2...
I don't recall how many papers I've read about the ABCD study but I'm always impressed with the potential such a well-conducted study holds. The paper itself is also quite interesting, even though I'm kind of skeptical regarding the concept of impulsivity.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Paper haul for April 13th-April 19th:
I feel like this is part of a broader cultural tend towards an exclusive focus on "critique" - we're developing infinite ways to articulate how things can be bad and/or getting worse, but very little to balance it out and recognize that good things are good.
I’m hiring a PhD student!
The candidate will work alongside @zefreeman.bsky.social, who is joining our research group as postdoc.
jobs.unibe.ch/job-vacancie...
Yeah - unser SFB Podcast „Wirkstoff Wort - der Podcast für Gute Kommunikation in der Medizin ist draußen!
Hört mal rein.
Danke an das großartige Public Outreach Team des SFBs!
Now that it has been out for a week, I thought I’d address a few strange takes regarding our recent mega-analysis on the effects of psychedelics on brain function (specifically, resting-state functional connectivity). 1/15
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
An image of the article "Desistance": A Multimethod Review of the Literature on Gender Identity Variability in Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth
New publication alert! After four years of analysis, synthesis, and careful writing, I am pleased to announce a brand-new article, “Desistance”: A Multimethod Review of the Literature on Gender Identity Variability in Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth (1) 🧵
psycnet.apa.org/record/2027-...
Concentrated academic recruiting. 10% of political science departments produce 60% of all polsci professors in Germany. FU Berlin produced most professors, followed by Mannheim, Hamburg, Frankfurt, Heidelberg. In psychology,...
Our work with Karl Friston on Self-Orthogonalizing Attractor Neural Networks is now out in Neurocomputing!
What does this theoretical model mean for our understanding of the brain? I’ve mapped out the key neuroscience implications below.
Read the thread for a neuroscience walk-through ↓
BOLD is not a simple monotonic readout of local firing. Instead, it reflects the net activity of two opposing neural populations. Interpreting it may require modeling their latent composition, not just overall activity.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
#neuroscience
1/6 Our paper is out today in Nature Communications!
From the SFB/TRR 289 Treatment Expectation @sfb-trr-289.bsky.social we show that temporal expectations shape somatosensory perception - for both painful heat AND non-painful cold stimuli.
That's it for the week. Gonna spend Sunday Re- reading some Invincible comics 😎
I also was able to read some actual books which is always a pleasure. This week I finished a short introduction to the epistemology of Jean Piaget which was quite interesting (www.junius-verlag.de/Programm/Zur...)
I understand none of the details but am still quite impressed (again) by the complex interaction between different neuromodulary systems.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
A really cool type of article! Would love to see some "Unsolved Mysteries" of Psychology. The paper itself by @diedrichsenjorn.bsky.social is also a great read. Very easy to follow while clearly describing the open questions in Cerebellum research.
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
While I very much agree with the basic premise (all psychology is fundamentally biologically caused) I vehemently disagree with everything else in this polemic.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Didn't actually work through the whole article (it's quite a long but very thorough read) but think it delivers a really important and simple message: metaphorical understanding of brain functioning needs to be biologically realized to be of proper scientific use.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...