Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by KSaburof

"different way of calculating" = usual way of faking :)

5 hours ago 0 0 0 0

"different way of calculating" = usual way of faking results :)

5 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Pretty cool how authors managed to expand on initially simple gameplay formula. Huge respect to Genki Kawamura, it was fun to watch 👍

9 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Lol, russia have a law punishment for people rejective "sacrifies of soviet heroes bla bla". And now this gerontological chmo declares "soviet heroes" were not really needed, it was socks 😂

Jokes aside - this man simply nuts 🤷‍♂️ in medical terms, imho

11 hours ago 3 0 0 0

its very fragile comparing to regular wire

1 day ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
a man wearing a limb2 sweatshirt holds his hair ALT: a man wearing a limb2 sweatshirt holds his hair

Wow, dedicated bureaucracy department to criticize another bureaucracy department. Whadahell 🤯

2 days ago 2 0 0 0

Lol, are we talking about "integrity of an analyst" now? Hint: we are not :)

Your point: "russia production only grows bla bla"
My point: There is a lot of data that contradict your point, including russian sources admitting mil.budgets cuts and non-payment issues extensively

Time will tell 🤷‍♂️

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

No, I am not inclined to think that Gerans and "tempo" is the only things that counts - UA building interceptors that are cheaper, and "rus tempo" for high ru-cost is *acceptable* tactic that guarantees russian failure (imho). It's not just "numbers comparison" contest, you know.

Time will tell 🤷‍♂️

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

Yeah, they are focusing on drones - and drones production expanded, will not deny. But much less than promised, btw

Still, drones is not the only thing needed - and decline in general already happening, imho there is a lot of data to support this conclusion. It's the beginning of the real crumbling

2 days ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Just skim over video - you may notice that it is not about Solovyev :) There are plentiful of *russian* sources that admit military production problems.

Tatarigami is a good intelligence team, focusing on exact documents (not indirect data) - so it's normal they lagging a bit.

Time will tell 🤷‍♂️

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

> Mar 2026 - 6,462

Not correct🤷‍♂️ I see you use ISIS numbers, but their latest report is: "March 2026: 6,462 Shahed-type UAVs of which 4,186 were identified as Shahed/Geran strike UAVs" - not really impressive change, Shaheds are SAME :) Esp. while you mentioned russia prioretizing Gerans, etc

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

Ok, will see in november then 🤷‍♂️

2 days ago 0 0 0 0

More every year? Lol, not really

> the closest they came to actually freezing Ukraine in many parts

This year - yes, and they also torpedoed russia's budget with it.
Will be they able to repeat similar barrage next year? I don't think so, because now they have no economy like in 2025 :)

2 days ago 1 0 1 0
"Дронов и ракет становится все меньше! Денег нет! Обвал бюджета" У РФ кончаются деньги на СВО
"Дронов и ракет становится все меньше! Денег нет! Обвал бюджета" У РФ кончаются деньги на СВО YouTube video by Denis Kazanskyi

It is you who need to clear eyes here :) because just comparing numbers shows decline even in military production, Solovyev literally openly whining that military budgets are cut 🤷‍♂️ Yes, they are still have some, but decline is obvious

Look here - www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvCF... - Denis collect such

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

It IS in ashes and they are able to throw 400+ drones simply because it's the last thing to give up for degenerates in kremlin :) other companies starving.

> but until you show a reduced war output
lol, just compare weekly missiles numbers year-to-year 🤷‍♂️ they already can't keep up with pricy stuff

2 days ago 1 0 1 0

It's 5th year and russia already tried ALL of that :) the current result with lost tempo and growing manpower problems happening after all russia's options already in play, but now their economy in ashes and even internal information control is not really working 🤷‍♂️

2 days ago 2 0 1 0
Preview
a man wearing sunglasses is sitting on a tree branch overlooking a river ALT: a man wearing sunglasses is sitting on a tree branch overlooking a river

> so they're not gonna stop.

WH admins be like 👇 😁

4 days ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

> If Pu invades a NATO
Imho the moment is lost, NATO will have to kick asses (even without US)

> a Trump/Shenko friendship will be a useful excuse
Literally no one will give a single fuck to trumps friendships after all the mess trump created.

> He'll ignore Article 5.
US out - Ukraine in 🤷‍♂️ Easy

5 days ago 3 0 1 0
Video

Oh, famous "shoigu shrug"!
There is also another version 👌

5 days ago 2 0 0 0

He is not in EU and can't blackmail it with veto etc...

Lukashenko may have his hopes - but in reality he is clown flushed own country following pukin's madness, not nearly as destructive as Obran, imho

5 days ago 4 0 1 0
Post image

What a marvelous threat 😂

5 days ago 0 0 0 0

imho it's more about Ukraine spreading the use of drone interceptors - it's not easy over 1000+km front, but results improvements are 👍👍👍

1 week ago 0 0 0 0

Trends are important, and some material output already decreased to interesting levels - for example russia unable to produce enough AA missiles, etc.

And there are enough metrics even with official ru-numbers - budget problems, non-payment issues, etc etc, it affects mil production and growing :)

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

Please improve the search of GIFs in gif popup :) type term -> wait for results -> scroll -> TRY to change term -> frustrate over each typed char, focus constantly stealed away

1 week ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

> its at best an unreliable hope
More than hope, trends are trends anyway, imho. "Collapsing" is a hype word while gradual degradation was visible all that time, very consistently, and it is stacking

1 week ago 10 0 1 0

+100, Exactly

bsky.app/profile/chri...

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

Pure idiocy on the US side, Vance simply admitted his short-sightedness imho. Helping UA normally would be a huge blow to Iran too, price Trump is now paying for what he started has already made up the difference many times over.

Vance boasting that the US lost far more than he "saved" back then 🤷‍♂️

1 week ago 0 0 0 0

Pure idiocy on the US side, Vance simply admitted his short-sightedness imho. Helping UA normally would be a huge blow to Iran too, price Trump is now paying for what he started has already made up the difference many times over.

Vance boasting that the US lost far more than he saved back then 🤷‍♂️

1 week ago 3 0 0 0

Because partnership is not about physical stuff at all 🤷‍♂️

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

👍👍👍

1 week ago 4 0 0 0