Art criticism has moved beyond this type of thinking. "Death of the Author" (Artist) and audience interpretation are both argued for. Not everyone agrees, but yea, this is much too strong a statement for the state of art today.

I mean, it would probably be an option like the end of The Good Place or Elves in Lotr. You just go 'off into the sunset' when you feel done.

Bring back the leftists who constantly talked about San Junipero and Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism, they were far better

No art theft is taking place. AI art is trained on art in the same way a human artist is - by looking at many examples. No art is lost, taken from others, or stored within it. If a piece is plagiarized, we should handle that as we do human forgery.

No art theft is taking place. AI art is trained on art in the same way a human artist is - by looking at many examples. No art is lost, taken from others, or stored within it. If a piece is plagiarized, we should handle that as we do human forgery.

So we're not gonna ban AI art then, right? 🤔

I understand where people are coming from, but just like photography wasn't seen as an 'art' at first, there will be artists who use AI to make great, intentional art. The 'imperfect mistakes' can be seen often when working with AI, where an odd word or phrase can create a completely new direction.

I heard this is a good place to talk about taxing the rich, breaking up big tech, and ending Washington corruption.

my dream game is just me going into the woods, collecting various foragables and trinkets, bring them back to my shop to sell. i can decorate my home and yard. i can have animals.

At the end of the day, don’t we all just want to pull a book from a bookshelf and find that it reveals a hidden room?