6 or 7. Could be an unscheduled nuke exercise, but so close to the ceasefire expiring, it seems like it is related to some kind of prelude to resuming hostilities again with Iran.
Could be wrong, but that timing is hard to ignore.
"One hell of a nuke drill" given we are deck gunning Iranian transports to make them stop now.
Been busy on the HFGCS today.
Because they have a mutual defense agreement.
Pair of 🇵🇰 "Pakistan warships" showing on Marine Traffic, both ~40 and 100 km off 🇴🇲 Muscat, Oman, respectively.
Not sure of the Armenian flag icon on one of them.
Yoooo broken leg warning.
Trump says 'whole country is getting blown up' if Iran does not accept deal Donald Trump told Fox News on Sunday that this was Iran's "last chance" to agree to a peace deal. "If Iran does not sign this deal, the whole country is getting blown up," Trump said. The US president then reiterated his earlier point on Truth Social that the US would target bridges and power plants specifically if Iran does not sign this agreement. The deal entails reopening the strait of Hormuz and making sure Iranians do not have enriched uranium. Trump also made clear that he would not be "making the same mistake" that Barack Obama did with the 2015 agreement his administration made to limit Iran's nuclear capabilities. In exchange for the lifting of some sanctions, Obama had conceded that Iran could contiune enriching its uranium for 15 years, but only at the level of purity required for a civilian nuclear programme. The agreement also included limiting Iran's stockpile of uranium to 300kg. Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018, calling the deal "one of the worst and most one-sided transactions" the US had ever entered into". Since then, Iran has grown its stockpile to 400.9kg of uranium enriched to 60%
IT’S THE SAME FUCKING MAXIMALIST SHIT.
These aren’t negotiations, they’re demand sessions.
And Trump continues warcrimes threats.
“US officials to travel to Pakistan for talks as Trump warns US will ‘knock out’ every power plant if Iran doesn’t accept deal” www.theguardian.com/world/live/2...
“IRGC Commander Major General Ahmad Vahid” … this is a name to become familiar with.
Sometimes twice.
Particularly, this rate from @dmitri.silverado.org
Told y'all the missile launch rate wasn't fluctuating for a reason.
There are two date columns, with the third one being a note section.
Surprised no one brought up the orange line. 🤔
Close. 😅
I will say the grouping is related, the question is why?
Yup!
Yup, and more :D
Drop the squack and yea, mostly.
I promise you, I'm not trying to be mean.
Nah, that's my other tab.
Random glimpse into my day-to-day: tell me what this all means.
Just can't keep a good bird down.
🇺🇸 KC-135R 62-3549 #AE066A up and at 'em yesterday after a long absence at KTIK.
Fire at St. Petersburg port is at ~59.873694, 30.213769. Looks like it was just an accident.
Images from a video taken from a different angle.
I have it in my notes that this hex code #AE7815 has been observed using callsigns by multiple other airframes. In this case, the one up over Sigonella should be 169602 based on a VVPE602 callsign.
Which is flabbergasting considering DefenceGeek and I are those OSINT accounts that they use for their reports, and we were saying nothing of the sort!
The first part was Polymarket's gold check account saying 'Breaking: a surge of USAF transports was under way'.
DefenceGeek called them out on it, then someone asked grok who was right, and Grok said "both make good points, but Polymarket's case was better because it relied on OSINT reports."
I don't know who runs this account, honestly.
I just know they are frequently a hype generator.
This is where I was challenging Grok after Polymarket deleted their post about a USAF transport surge that wasn't as big (or as dramatic) as they were making it sound.
