Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by

I would like to see every motor vehicle equipped with a breathalyzer to start it.

15 hours ago 0 0 0 0

If you have property, get solar panels, batteries and windmills.

15 hours ago 6 0 0 0

Hand him some medical isotopes and ask him if he can see the radiation.

16 hours ago 0 0 0 0

It's time for countries like Canada, who helped create the mess in Afghanistan, to help these people before this happens.

16 hours ago 1 0 0 0

The world cup is my favourite sporting event by far. I am so disgusted by what these assholes have done to it. Absolutely shameful.

16 hours ago 1 0 0 0

I think you guys could use some factories an ocean away from Russia, in a country with abundant natural resources and advanced manufacturing capacity and infrastructure. I think I know just the place...

17 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Anyone remember Battlestar Galactica when that guy went into the room for years waiting for the cylons to show up, and they never did?

17 hours ago 0 0 0 0

That's not self reflection. It's a rat jumping off a sinking ship.

19 hours ago 0 0 0 0
ALT TEXT: A vibrant, stylized acrylic painting of a sunset over water, rendered in a bold, folk-art style with thick black outlines reminiscent of stained glass. A large yellow-orange sun sits on the horizon, its semicircle edged with small dotted flecks suggesting sparkle. Wavy rays of red, magenta, and cream radiate outward across a deep pink and crimson sky. On the left, a tall, dark green conifer tree stands in silhouette against the bright sky, rooted on a patch of green grass. On the right, layered green and black mountain peaks recede into the distance. A blue lake fills the foreground, with wavy reflections of the sunset shimmering in pink, orange, and coral streaks across the water's surface. The overall style is naive and decorative, with flat color areas and undulating linework creating a cheerful, dreamlike atmosphere.

FACT CHECK:

This needs a hard look — the source alone is a major red flag, and the claim is extraordinary. Let me dig in.Let me verify a couple of specific details — Johnson's actual CIA tenure and the chain-of-command issue that keeps coming up.Now let me verify the chain-of-command specifics — a key claim here is that the Chairman of the JCS could "stop" a nuclear order.I have enough to write this up. Here's the fact-check:

## Fact check: "Trump tried to use nuclear codes, Gen. Caine said no"

**Bottom line: The underlying claim is unverified, sourced to a single unreliable commentator, and the mechanical premise (that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs could "stand up and say no") is structurally wrong. Treat this as rumor, not news.**

### Where the claim actually comes from

Paul Eric's post is a paraphrase of a claim Larry C. Johnson made on the "Judging Freedom" podcast, hosted by former judge Andrew Napolitano, amplified on X by Jimmy Dore, and picked up by IBTimes UK with the caveat that it "has not been confirmed by any official source." The White House, the Pentagon, and Gen. Caine's office have not responded to the claim — and no official record, court document, or on-the-record source has corroborated the account of an emergency meeting or nuclear codes being raised.

So the entire chain is: one podcast guest → a Jimmy Dore tweet → aggregators → your Bluesky screenshot. No second source. No documents. No named officials.

### Who Larry Johnson is

This matters, because "retired CIA analyst" is doing a lot of work in the framing. Johnson worked at the CIA as an analyst from 1985 through September 1989 — roughly four years — before moving to the State Department's Office of Counterterrorism, and left government entirely in October 1993. He has been out of government for **over 30 years**. He has no plausible mechanism to know what happened in a White House meeting on Saturday night.

His track record also undercuts the "insider revelation" framing:

- In 2008 he claimed a tape existed of Michelle Obama using the word "whitey"; no such tape ever surfaced and the Obama campaign denied it.
- He was the source for Andrew Napolitano's 2017 Fox News claim that GCHQ had wiretapped Trump's 2016 campaign on Obama's orders — a claim Fox News itself later disavowed.
- Since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Johnson has made regular appearances on Russian state media, expressed support for the war effort, and been cited hundreds of times in Izvestia, Sputnik, and RIA Novosti.
- VOA documented that from August 2023 to September 2024, Russia's RIA Novosti alone published 403 pieces citing Johnson; Lenta.ru published 445; Rossiyskaya Gazeta 299; Sputnik 280; RT 163 — with the Kremlin using his claims to promote pro-Russian narratives.

This is exactly the kind of source-laundering pattern you flag — a partisan-coded claim ("Trump is unstable") bolted onto a propaganda-coded source ("Judging Freedom" / Johnson), which then travels through left-of-center social media with the Russia-adjacent ecosystem scrubbed out of the attribution.

### The mechanical problem with the claim

Even if you grant Johnson knew something, the story doesn't work as described. In the U.S., the president — and only the president — has the authority to order the use of nuclear weapons. Gen. Mark Milley told the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2021: "I explained to her that the president is the sole nuclear launch authority, and he doesn't launch them alone, and that I am not qualified to determine the mental health of the president of the United States." Milley also noted he is **not** in the chain of command — he is the principal military adviser — but is kept "in the loop."

A 2021 CRS summary puts it directly: the CJCS "is part of the 'chain of communication' in his role as the President's primary military advisor, but he is not in the 'chain of command' for authorizing a nuclear launch… The President does not need the concurrence of either his military leaders or the U.S. Congress to order the launch of nuclear weapons. Neither the military nor Congress can overrule these orders."

So the image of Gen. Caine "standing up and saying NO" in a meeting and thereby stopping a launch is not how the system works. A CJCS can raise legal objections, slow things down in a decision conference, or (in extremis) individual officers down the chain could refuse an order they judged illegal under UCMJ/LOAC — but none of that looks like the dramatic veto Johnson is describing. Even the **critics** of sole presidential authority, like former SecDef William Perry, argue for reform precisely because no such veto formally exists.

### What else is off

- **"Saturday" is doing a lot of work.** Johnson offered no documents, no named attendees, no corroborating leakers. Not even an anonymous "senior administration official." Just vibes.
- **The Hawaiian shirt is not a disqualifier on its own** — that's just a guy on a podcast set — but it's a useful reminder of what this actually is: a commentator riffing, not a source reporting.
- **Epistemic consistency check:** If a right-wing podcast host claimed a retired CIA guy had revealed Biden tried to do something reckless and was stopped by an anonymous general, with zero corroboration and the source being a longtime Kremlin media fixture, you'd (rightly) demand more. Same standard applies here.

### If you're thinking about sharing a correction

A tight version for a reply: "This is sourced to Larry Johnson on Napolitano's podcast — the same Johnson behind the debunked Obama 'whitey' tape and Napolitano's retracted GCHQ-wiretap claim, and a regular on Russian state media. No second source has confirmed it. Also, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs isn't in the nuclear chain of command — he advises, he doesn't veto."

ALT TEXT: A vibrant, stylized acrylic painting of a sunset over water, rendered in a bold, folk-art style with thick black outlines reminiscent of stained glass. A large yellow-orange sun sits on the horizon, its semicircle edged with small dotted flecks suggesting sparkle. Wavy rays of red, magenta, and cream radiate outward across a deep pink and crimson sky. On the left, a tall, dark green conifer tree stands in silhouette against the bright sky, rooted on a patch of green grass. On the right, layered green and black mountain peaks recede into the distance. A blue lake fills the foreground, with wavy reflections of the sunset shimmering in pink, orange, and coral streaks across the water's surface. The overall style is naive and decorative, with flat color areas and undulating linework creating a cheerful, dreamlike atmosphere. FACT CHECK: This needs a hard look — the source alone is a major red flag, and the claim is extraordinary. Let me dig in.Let me verify a couple of specific details — Johnson's actual CIA tenure and the chain-of-command issue that keeps coming up.Now let me verify the chain-of-command specifics — a key claim here is that the Chairman of the JCS could "stop" a nuclear order.I have enough to write this up. Here's the fact-check: ## Fact check: "Trump tried to use nuclear codes, Gen. Caine said no" **Bottom line: The underlying claim is unverified, sourced to a single unreliable commentator, and the mechanical premise (that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs could "stand up and say no") is structurally wrong. Treat this as rumor, not news.** ### Where the claim actually comes from Paul Eric's post is a paraphrase of a claim Larry C. Johnson made on the "Judging Freedom" podcast, hosted by former judge Andrew Napolitano, amplified on X by Jimmy Dore, and picked up by IBTimes UK with the caveat that it "has not been confirmed by any official source." The White House, the Pentagon, and Gen. Caine's office have not responded to the claim — and no official record, court document, or on-the-record source has corroborated the account of an emergency meeting or nuclear codes being raised. So the entire chain is: one podcast guest → a Jimmy Dore tweet → aggregators → your Bluesky screenshot. No second source. No documents. No named officials. ### Who Larry Johnson is This matters, because "retired CIA analyst" is doing a lot of work in the framing. Johnson worked at the CIA as an analyst from 1985 through September 1989 — roughly four years — before moving to the State Department's Office of Counterterrorism, and left government entirely in October 1993. He has been out of government for **over 30 years**. He has no plausible mechanism to know what happened in a White House meeting on Saturday night. His track record also undercuts the "insider revelation" framing: - In 2008 he claimed a tape existed of Michelle Obama using the word "whitey"; no such tape ever surfaced and the Obama campaign denied it. - He was the source for Andrew Napolitano's 2017 Fox News claim that GCHQ had wiretapped Trump's 2016 campaign on Obama's orders — a claim Fox News itself later disavowed. - Since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Johnson has made regular appearances on Russian state media, expressed support for the war effort, and been cited hundreds of times in Izvestia, Sputnik, and RIA Novosti. - VOA documented that from August 2023 to September 2024, Russia's RIA Novosti alone published 403 pieces citing Johnson; Lenta.ru published 445; Rossiyskaya Gazeta 299; Sputnik 280; RT 163 — with the Kremlin using his claims to promote pro-Russian narratives. This is exactly the kind of source-laundering pattern you flag — a partisan-coded claim ("Trump is unstable") bolted onto a propaganda-coded source ("Judging Freedom" / Johnson), which then travels through left-of-center social media with the Russia-adjacent ecosystem scrubbed out of the attribution. ### The mechanical problem with the claim Even if you grant Johnson knew something, the story doesn't work as described. In the U.S., the president — and only the president — has the authority to order the use of nuclear weapons. Gen. Mark Milley told the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2021: "I explained to her that the president is the sole nuclear launch authority, and he doesn't launch them alone, and that I am not qualified to determine the mental health of the president of the United States." Milley also noted he is **not** in the chain of command — he is the principal military adviser — but is kept "in the loop." A 2021 CRS summary puts it directly: the CJCS "is part of the 'chain of communication' in his role as the President's primary military advisor, but he is not in the 'chain of command' for authorizing a nuclear launch… The President does not need the concurrence of either his military leaders or the U.S. Congress to order the launch of nuclear weapons. Neither the military nor Congress can overrule these orders." So the image of Gen. Caine "standing up and saying NO" in a meeting and thereby stopping a launch is not how the system works. A CJCS can raise legal objections, slow things down in a decision conference, or (in extremis) individual officers down the chain could refuse an order they judged illegal under UCMJ/LOAC — but none of that looks like the dramatic veto Johnson is describing. Even the **critics** of sole presidential authority, like former SecDef William Perry, argue for reform precisely because no such veto formally exists. ### What else is off - **"Saturday" is doing a lot of work.** Johnson offered no documents, no named attendees, no corroborating leakers. Not even an anonymous "senior administration official." Just vibes. - **The Hawaiian shirt is not a disqualifier on its own** — that's just a guy on a podcast set — but it's a useful reminder of what this actually is: a commentator riffing, not a source reporting. - **Epistemic consistency check:** If a right-wing podcast host claimed a retired CIA guy had revealed Biden tried to do something reckless and was stopped by an anonymous general, with zero corroboration and the source being a longtime Kremlin media fixture, you'd (rightly) demand more. Same standard applies here. ### If you're thinking about sharing a correction A tight version for a reply: "This is sourced to Larry Johnson on Napolitano's podcast — the same Johnson behind the debunked Obama 'whitey' tape and Napolitano's retracted GCHQ-wiretap claim, and a regular on Russian state media. No second source has confirmed it. Also, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs isn't in the nuclear chain of command — he advises, he doesn't veto."

There's a lot wrong with this claim.

I put a fact check in the alt-text for this lovely image.

1 day ago 29 8 5 1
Advertisement

Excellent. Thank you.

20 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Yeah. That's basically a summary of the same YouTube video as the other one. It's a statement made by someone who wasn't there. Again, they admit the story can't be confirmed. I'm not saying something like that didn't happen, I'm saying it hasn't been confirmed as fact.

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

No, I don't. I think something like that likely happened. However, on retired CIA official who wasn't there and no corroboration is a far cry from a proven fact.

1 day ago 0 0 1 0

While I believe he wanted to use nuclear weapons to destroy a civilization, and the military said no, the article clearly states that the claim can not be confirmed.

1 day ago 0 0 2 0

Might as well introduce them to corporate culture early.

1 day ago 5 0 0 0

That clip, which I'm sure is part of a longer but equally disgusting interview, should have both those idiots shunned by everyone, forever.

1 day ago 2 0 0 0

For those attending the White House Correspondents' Dinner this weekend, a small question:

When you're sitting there at your table, do you think it'll cross your mind that the guest of honor is actively covering up his role in a massive child sex trafficking operation?

1 day ago 12138 3300 167 131
Advertisement

The same could be said about every other president.

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

Think about how much of a poor person's time is spent on depressing calculation of who can wait for payment so that they can get groceries. And then that other debt hanging over them and how it will be paid next month. Then repeat. That's unsustainable. Of course it creates mental health problems.

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

I wonder why he felt this needed to be said right now. If those people are too stupid to understand that what he stated is going to happen, without him explicitly stating it, then they deserve what they get anyway.

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

I believe that the threat to destroy a civilization meant emptying a submarine. I also believe that there was nobody in the US Navy willing to do it and that's why the ceasefire happened.

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

It looks like a Canada Post management failure to me. I prefer my packages either locked in a box down the street, or at a pickup point a ten minute walk away. Canada Post isn't even an option I can choose when I order most times. Why not?

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

This was always the scam. People pay more for goods because of the tariffs. Then the money that originally belonged to normal people is refunded to corporations and billionaires.

2 days ago 5 2 0 0
Musk proving he is a Nazi by giving the salute. At Trump's inauguration.

Musk proving he is a Nazi by giving the salute. At Trump's inauguration.

I hate this Nazi even more:

2 days ago 2 0 0 0

You mean the guy who was feared dead on good Friday, spent Saturday in a cave and emerged alive on Easter Sunday? I think everyone has heard about that.

2 days ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Amazon, which saved $4B in taxes under Trump's Big Ugly Bill, has cut 30,000 jobs since last October.

Verizon, which saved $2B, plans to cut 15,000 jobs this year.

Meta, which saved $3B, plans to lay off 20% or more of its workforce.

Trickle-down economics is a cruel joke.

2 days ago 5873 2425 213 101

The UK didn't use the euro

2 days ago 2 0 0 0

And then they call ICE when the relationship falls apart.

3 days ago 12 0 0 0

There is plenty of evidence, which I'm sure his handlers will us, to successfully argue he is mentally unfit to stand trial.

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

"You're just jealous of rich people"

no I'm angry that a man with 12 vacation homes is paying less in taxes than a nurse

3 days ago 975 254 32 11

Exactly. If the owner faced zero consequences, why would anyone expect his employer to face consequences for actions considered less objectionable?

4 days ago 0 0 0 0