theheatherashley & 46m © Threads Might've redacted the email addresses, but forgot to redact the signature. 1/2 1 of 1 To: From: Sent: Subject: HI! Wed 10/23/2002 7:40:52 PM Dear G! How are you? Nice story about JE in NY mag. You look great on the picture. I know you are very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you are back in NY. Have a great time! Love, Melania
Lulz
Pretty sure it is Trump trying to shift the conversation to affordability...
Rest in Peace Alex Jeffrey Pretti🙏🏾 The VA ICU Nurses send him off right 💔
I really only know him as Loudon Wainright's son. Great anthem last night, though.
The party's final and most essential command is to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.
There's also a better than zero chance he is working to give Bagram back to the Soviets.
It’s not a crime to be in this country as an undocumented person. It’s a civil violation.
But you know what is a crime? Taking a bribe from undercover agents in exchange for the promise of government contracts WHEN YOU’RE THE FCKING BORDER CZAR.
Good point.
Actual sentence on MSNBC: "Charlie was actually a pretty good guy. He was nice to me." Kamala Harris, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Joy Reid would beg to differ,
Short-fingered vulgarian
Got it. Ok for me but not for thee. Pretty sure you've been lecturing me for things I didn't say. As you apparently like to say, grow up. Did I get that right?
Based on the same data set you're using, seems to me you also engage with people you don't disagree with. Or "look for fights." Whatever. This has indeed become tiresome. Back to chatting with my fiends and reading intelligent content on contemporary events.
It showed up in my feed. Not looking for this shit. Found it poorly thought out and reacted. Had a short conversation about it with a few folks. Is that not the purpose of this place? Discourse?
Again, generalization not supported by facts. How many fit that description? Show the proof. Seems very few to me based on coverage. All need to fight fascism and tyranny. Whatever it takes see it and resist is ok w me. The mature thing to do is not make ageist jokes about allies.
Eloquent argument. Memes for the win.
And fwiw, looks like the near wall-to-wall coverage of the Kimmel suspension yesterday -- by a lot of non-boomer reporters and analysts shows how foolish the original joke was. Clearly no dichotomy.
Because people in a an age group, gender, or race never say say anything bad about the age group, gender, or race they are part of? I'm just not making any assumptions about the OP's age. Sounds to me like you're saying joking about boomers is a defining characteristic of younger demographics.
What proof do you have that op is not a boomer? Boomers don't make jokes?
OTOH looked to be fewer than a dozen people...
Had same thought.
If you're happy being an ageist troll, go for it.
More of a candle light service vibe. The solemnity was jarring.
It clearly is what you said based on the meaning of the words you used. The mature thing to do would be to just admit it was a bad joke and move on.
I was riding home Tuesday night and swear I saw a similar vigil outside the Boxford town hall. Big poster board leaning against a tree with pictures of Kirk. Disorienting, honestly.
And you're comfortable posting that boomers aren't serious. Words matter.
So where is the dichotomy? Even using some boomers implies they were not upset by ICE. Radicalization is not a binary process triggered by a single event. What you thought was a wry observation that boomers upset by Kimmel were less serious than people upset by ICE - was a poorly thought out joke.
Can you imagine how much the royals are laughing at this buffoon behind his back?
Show your evidence that boomers have not also been radicalized by ICE. It's not a dichotomy. It's additive.
He has it right. Otoh, heard a white, female reporter say on MSNBC two days ago that Charlie Kirk was actually a pretty good guy, because "he was nice" to her.
