On and off I'm tempted to make a thread where I give thoughts on programming languages I've learned. There are so many that have really changed the way I think

Haskell, Forth, Scheme, and Smalltalk in particular were enlightening.
Probably Prolog too, but I haven't deep dived it yet

Plus many more

Sometimes I think about how much stuff is "convention" that we just take for granted.

Like on controllers for games, "movement" is on the left side, "actions" (and "camera") is on the right side.

Building a game where you move with the right side to fuck with your right thumb's uncoordinated ass

Cannot stress enough how unappealing an algorithmically shoveled endless feed of shortform-format videos is to me

And I think every website that has added them following tiktok's popularity has gotten worse for it

Crossing the boomer border by refusing to get a tiktok and thus closing myself off to 99% of the modern memesphere

To me size is so closely tied to power that shrunken doms / grown subs doesn't hit me like some others (I do see the appeal tho)

But if I was into it, I feel like I would need to fight the urge to say that someone is "shrunk on power"

Not necessarily a question for me to answer but certainly something for me to imagine

Gosh that's hot 💦

Just writhing, held hostage, only able to feel the heat and rumbling vibrations getting them worked up, making them cum again and again as they dwindle.... mmmf

ngl.link/srgts2

Actually yeah, that is a very good way of putting it. Feels more real and less fantasy

Yeah, I was kinda thinking that might be why. It has an "almost same size but only kind of shorter" vibe, where as I'm like... speck, mote, lint, etc etc

I see "runt" used a lot in size contexts but for some reason it just doesn't hit me, idk why

Not that it's a bad word or anything and more power to the people that like to tease it or get teased by it. It just doesn't activate neurons for me

What's left of the world's population won't survive what became of the first half....

Live broadcast on the production of city-slop,,

The "Mommy's body is going to deconstruct you because she loves you" concept is 🔥

It must be good for them if it feels so good for you, right? They wiggle so much for mommy when they get slurped down

Yeah

I think it has always been a "negative" word, or at least intended to be, and that's kinda what makes it hot in a way. In the same way that being "crushed" should sound bad but... has an allure lol

The modern [techno]-slop stuff does ruin the word a bit 😔

"_-slop" has started becoming one of my favorite phrases in kink (specifically vore-adjacent) contexts

My kink be like

❌️ Why are you like that (small)

✅️ I want you like that (small)

*Someone posts something hot*

Oh gosh, I need to inform them how much I wish to submit to them

But I'm tired, and I don't want to invite conversation rn that I'm too tired to continue. Maybe I'll wait

*After sleep*

Well... now the context is gone and it would feel weird to message them randomly

The spotlight (microscope lens) is on me >w<

Oh hey, there me

Planetary boy 😳

O...oh 💦💦💦

Sometimes you see a size image that rearranges the neurons in your brain and imprints itself into your mind at a fundamental level so you can't stop thinking about it

- But back on the topic of complex numbers, this means that the conjugate of a complex number is an equally valid representation of the same real and imaginary components. One is a mirrored system of the other.

.....And I just think that's neat.

- What really matters is that they are *opposites* of each other. One is only one way in the context of the other being the other way. We could have just as easily labeled them the reverse and have an equally valid representation. -

- to someone using j, i would be the backwards one because i is -j.

Which reminds about other systems that are arbitrary because of convention. Positive / negative electric charge is an example. We say that electrons have "negative" charge and that "protons" have positive charge. -

One is only negative in the context of the other. Say we define a variable "j" to be "-i". This also means that i = -j. Every instance of +i could be replaced with +j and all formulas involving complex numbers would hold. To someone using i, j would seem "backwards" since it's -i. But -

- can be derived for -i instead of i, and produce a system that is isomorphic. This means that every analytic function still holds if every single instance of i is replaced with -i. In fact thinking about one of them as "positive" and the other as "negative" is arbitrary. -

"wow what kind of universal size thoughts is sam thinking"

Sam: i is not defined as THE sqrt of -1, but as a value that when squared is -1. There are actually two roots of -1, i and -i, and therefore each is perfectly in the context of sqrt(-1). The exponential function with imaginary arguments -

You don't let Lexi near shrunk, you lose, Lexi Handling Manual, cover, big bold font (red)

You let Lexi near shrunk cities, you lose cities, Lexi Handling Manual, pg. 4

Wait Lexi have you been *consuming* the labs I've been sending down there??? We need those for shrinking research!