We are in midst of another fossil fuel crisis and need to accelerate electrification to strengthen energy and economic security. This decision by HMRC to appeal a court ruling that government should not be charging more than 5% VAT on EV charging only undermines that mission - No 10 needs to step in
Posts by Ed Matthew
As Iran war reminds us all the cost of fossil fuel dependence, news breaks that new electric cars are now cheaper to buy than new petrol cars for first time. They are already £1000 a year cheaper to run each year. EV demand is set to accelerate
14 years of new North Sea oil and gas licenses under Tory administrations under a maximum extraction policy led to one months supply of gas. It proves that new licenses will do nothing to strengthen our energy security. It is a fantasy peddled by the political wing of the fossil fuel barons
Why have progressive voters deserted Labour? I’ve worked as a climate campaigner for 20 years and one clue to this question may be that since Labour came to power I’ve detected no change from Treasury on climate action - they are as backward as the Tories - perhaps scared of Reform. This must change
Great thread from @drsimevans.carbonbrief.org ripping to pieces the shameless disinformation on the cost of net zero from oil and gas funded Tufton Street and covered without due scrutiny by the right wing media. It assumes funding and running a fossil fuel system is free - 100% bollocks
Drivers of EVs can save on average over £1000 a year on fuel costs. Badenoch is not on the side of drivers. She is on the side of the fossil fuel companies. A faster transition to EVs will also help to keep our car manufacturers competitive
ECO was failing but needed reform, not axing. The impact will be a cut of £5 billion to insulate fuel poor homes and loss of 10,000 jobs. Reeves cut winter fuel payments then u-turned; she then cut disability benefits then u-turned. Now she is slashing funding for the fuel poor. A Labour Chancellor
I’m quoted in this article criticising Chancellor for axing ECO, the U.K. insulation scheme. The most recent version failed due to terrible design by former government, but it needed reform, not scrapping. The decision is a £5 billion cut to insulate homes of fuel poor and will cost 10,000 jobs
The real story here is Reeves trying to gut the warm homes plan. If she gets her way at Budget and the ECO green levy is axed, then green homes funding for insulation and electrification will be cut from £21bn to £13bn over 5 years - a 40% cut which will lead to more gas dependency and higher bills
What a great project to make the use of veteran skills - helping to accelerate the clean tech revolution. Extra poignant given clean energy is super essential to energy security and indeed national security
Guardian cover letter we helped coordinate to call on the Chancellor not to cut or axe the Energy Company Obligation at Budget. 67 civil society groups and major businesses say it would threaten fuel poverty and climate targets to remove UKs leading insulation programme. Thanks to all that signed
The Treasury is at serious risk of killing off the transition to electric vehicles by bringing in a new pay per mile tax at Budget. Given the market is only just going mainstream, this move could torpedo progress. It’s bad timing which won’t help the U.K. EV industry or climate action
The Treasury is actively contemplating axing the UKs main insulation programme (ECO) to cut energy bills. Given how critical insulation is to ending fuel poverty and reducing energy bills, it would be completely self defeating and destroy the insulation industry as well. Mobilise. Now.
Because you are not listening. You think that electricity would be cheaper if we were more dependent on gas. That is not true.
What this analysis shows is that electricity bills would have been higher if it wasn’t for offshore wind. If you care about bills then you should be happy to see this. It also cuts carbon and if the world doesn’t go carbon free then economies will tank. Do you want that for future generations?
Do you really think replacing wind with gas would have led to cheaper electricity bills? Did you notice what just happened to gas prices following Russian invasion of Ukraine? it has cost households thousands
This catastrophic, record breaking hurricane was made 5 times more likely by climate change. The politicians and media figures arguing for slowing down the transition to carbon free energy are fuelling this destruction
Yes money saved compared to what bills would have been if we had used gas instead. This is a good news story - using sustainable British energy sources which generate cheaper power than using gas. But I doubt those being used by the fossil fuel industry to further their profits will want to admit it
This is powerful research showing that the UK has saved over £100 Billion on our energy bills due to the roll out of wind power. That is the saving after accounting for green subsidies. This shreds false claims by Reform that renewables drives up energy bills. They are lying. The reverse is true
Data from the real world shows that hybrid cars are little better than regular petrol and diesel cars when it comes to the fuel they consume, the CO2 they produce and the money they cost to run. The lesson here is that the industry (and consumers) should leap straight to full electric cars
Every day is a good day to point out that 92% of Reform's donations were found to come from figures and groups linked to the fossil fuel industry. @desmog.com
China ≠ just coal plants and solar exports. The deeper shift: electrifying everything it can. Strategic, because China relies on imported fossil fuels. Coal is still king in the power mix—for now. But the balance is changing year by year.
This blog is my take on the Tory Party vow this week to axe the Climate Change Act. This is not leadership. It is surrender to the commercial interests of fossil fuel barons at the cost of us all.
My take on the decision by Kemi Badenoch to end the fight against the climate crisis and torpedo the U.K. economy and a great critique by @fionaharvey.bsky.social of the falsehoods set out in the Tory press release. This action by Badenoch is utterly shameful.
Kemi Badenoch has now aligned the Tory party on climate with Trump and the far right parties of Europe. Tragic. It shows that she is more interested in the profits of oil and gas companies than the security of the country. The Tory party can no longer be trusted on the environment or the economy
There’s a persistent myth that new solar farms don’t really help tackle climate change because panels are “made with coal” and “never pay back” their carbon debt.
This is simply false.
- UN: solar ~8x cleaner than gas, ~19x than coal per kWh
- panels repay CO2 in 4 months; save 57x over life
It doesn’t. Most of the potential savings come from helping households with heat pumps to access electricity when it is cheap. Making sure they are installed to a high standard of efficiency also provides big savings. Getting off gas will also save money. Some levies can be paid for my exchequer
And here is the graphic showing the potential for heat pumps to cost half as much to run as a gas boiler WITH policy reforms - full report is here : www.e3g.org/publications...
www.theguardian.com/environment/... - our latest E3G report showing that with policy reform, running a heat pump could be half the price of running a gas boiler. The future is electric !
Ofgem just approved a record £24bn investment in gas & electric grids to 2031, making bills "£30 lower" than they would have been
Predictably, some usual-suspect media have mangled the reporting.
So here's a Really Simple guide to counterfactuals, with Bluey refs: